Vibrance vs. Saturation in Plain English
Recently I posted about the difference between exposure, brightness and fill light. Today, I want to talk about the difference between vibrance and saturation. Those fun little color boosting sliders which can make or break a shot.
First, I’ll give you some definitions and the we’ll look closer at the difference made on a shot.
{Saturation}
Saturation is a uniform bumping up the intensity of all colors in your shot, regardless of the starting point of the colors. This can result in clipping (over saturation of certain colors which results in loss of detail in those areas) and over saturation of skin tones leaving them looking too orange and unnatural.
{Vibrance}
Vibrance is a smart-tool which cleverly increases the intensity of the more muted colors and leaves the already well-saturated colors alone. It’s sort of like fill light, but for colors. Vibrance also prevents skin tones from becoming overly saturated and unnatural.
See the below example made in Lightroom:
In the middle shot, the saturation was turned up to +50 and you can see what the red bricks have gotten a tad out of control. Too red in my opinion. But when I turned the vibrance up +50 instead, Lightroom already saw that the red was very red but that the grass could use a bump (a bit of ‘fill color’ if you will). I think that the bottom edit is much more reasonable than the shot edited with added saturation.




36 Responses to “Vibrance vs. Saturation in Plain English” - Add Yours
July 21st, 2011 at 5:42 am
So do you ever use the Saturation slider? Seems like it’s pretty rare where you want to bump up the entire image.
July 21st, 2011 at 5:43 am
Thanks for the tip. Now I understand how it works. Thanks again
July 21st, 2011 at 6:01 am
I think the saturation image has better skin tones. But then saturation can be modified locally with a brush, so vibrance is better for over-all changes.
July 21st, 2011 at 6:01 am
Thanks. I am finding these little snippets quite helpful as one just tends to forget these differences.
July 21st, 2011 at 6:35 am
That’s a little circular I think. Perhaps it could be better put as “Saturation” is a uniform bumping up of the color intensity”?
July 21st, 2011 at 7:19 am
I like the saturation photo. The vibrant red on the building is nice so I think you have to evaluate each photo and choose the one you like the best.
July 21st, 2011 at 9:02 am
thanks for the tip…I never knew the difference!
July 21st, 2011 at 10:45 am
I had never even noticed the ‘vibrance’ slider, so I will definitely check it out now. Thanks for the explanation!
July 21st, 2011 at 10:58 am
Very good series to explain basic functions in photoshop… thanks… and please keep going on with this…
July 21st, 2011 at 1:56 pm
Thanks for this. I find these useful. I have used the vibrance slider and have liked the results. I try to understand how everything works under the monitor to improve my use of the tools. Discussions like this really help.
July 21st, 2011 at 2:03 pm
I think that the brick looks ok in a redder hue, but the grass looks far too unnatural in the Saturdation +50 image. I always tended to like my Vibrance bumps, but felt the Saturation bumps were too artificial looking. Now I actually understand why. Thanks!
July 21st, 2011 at 2:38 pm
Thanks for this post. I have recently downloaded Light Room and use it only for noise reduction only. I see many sliders of colors in LR and get confused about their precise use. This post is really easy to understand for me as I am not well aware with very technical words. Thanks again for making me understand about the difference of saturation and vibrance….
July 21st, 2011 at 9:36 pm
I very much enjoy your posts on the whole. Thanks for helping me understand the difference between vibrance and saturation.
Only one minor thing about the pictures you used – the horizon was off and it was the first thing I noticed. I didn’t notice the saturation or anything else, just that the horizon was tilted. Then I saw the rest of the picture.
Thanks again!
July 22nd, 2011 at 3:12 am
Not sure about Photoshop, but GIMP allows you to increase saturation of all colors, some colors or just a single color. You can also separate the image into color channels and only work on one channel at a time! I would be surprised if Photoshop did not allow the same control.
July 22nd, 2011 at 4:31 pm
Photoshop CS4 does have individual control for saturate/desaturate 6 colours, or all together.
July 22nd, 2011 at 4:34 pm
I was also worried about the perpective distortion in the building. That would have been the first thing I would have corrected.
July 22nd, 2011 at 10:40 pm
Thanks for the tip. I was realy confused earlier between these two options
July 22nd, 2011 at 11:18 pm
Thanks… A good explanation.. “fill light for color.”
July 22nd, 2011 at 11:41 pm
I prefer to use the Vibrance slider as was stated here but I sometimes bump the saturation just a little bit for a bit more pop in the color. I’m talkin +5 or so after I get the Vibrance where I want it. Nothing anywhere near the +50 used in the example. Nice writeup.
July 23rd, 2011 at 1:55 am
Vibrance only affect to mid-tones that’s why its softer than saturation!
July 23rd, 2011 at 5:06 am
Thanks, had been wondering about that for a while now!
July 23rd, 2011 at 8:11 am
I am LOVING these articles!! Thank you!!
July 23rd, 2011 at 9:44 am
Thanks for the simple explanation of the differences between the vibrance and saturation tools.
Personally I like the “before” picture best. The others look like what they are: fake.
July 24th, 2011 at 12:03 pm
Thanks for the explanation and (especially) the image example. Good simple explanation – always wondered what the difference was and this makes it clear.
July 24th, 2011 at 3:58 pm
Thanks for this! One q: what is the most accurate? I know that that has become a slippery slope but it was your eyes that were there. Can you remember if the top photo was more accurate, or if bumping up the colour reflects reality (and compensates for a deficient camera!)?
July 27th, 2011 at 12:55 am
Another great post! Explaining the basic tools with clarity is a great help. Thanks!
July 30th, 2011 at 11:17 pm
There’s a visual difference to the way colors that are affected look and feel. Painters often talk about the “weight” of colors – i.e. blue seems heavier than yellow. Vibrance adds more weight to colors than Saturation. Vibrance can make a blue sky look/feel rich and gutsy, but past a certain point will reduce the airy quality it has. Saturation makes yellow highlights less weighty and glow more. but past a certain point it can start clipping channels and make areas seem hot and flat. Often it’s not as simple as choosing between the two, but finding the right balance between the two. Look closely. Trust your eyes.
August 2nd, 2011 at 1:28 am
thank u i get it
August 2nd, 2011 at 8:17 am
I noticed the wedding dress lost some detail in the Vibrance example. The dress is the focus, no?
August 2nd, 2011 at 11:08 am
I use vibrance all the time, it is especially good in bringing out colours for sunsets and landscapes without blowing already saturated areas
August 5th, 2011 at 8:58 am
Thank you!!! It is so hard to find articles that actually go into the detail of what all these different sliders do. And it’s hard sometimes to figure it out by yourself. These articles are very helpful. Thanks again.
August 11th, 2011 at 12:04 am
Does Vibrance add noise or any grain though? I’ve always felt like it was enhancing colors of course, but somewhat effecting the sharpness as well, which is why I’m always afraid to use it.
August 13th, 2011 at 8:22 pm
I haven’t been using Photoshop Elements 9 for very long and this is probably a newbie question, so I hope you’ll bear with me. I couldn’t find a Vibrance slider in PSE 9. Is there one and I’m just missing it? Nice clear explanation of the difference between Vib and Sat. Thank you.
August 14th, 2011 at 1:20 am
very good looking info, thanks for your great site
November 29th, 2011 at 7:01 pm
I have found that we touch saturation and vibrance very little in our files. Contrast also increases vibrance
February 14th, 2012 at 9:25 pm
It pays to use both depending on your photo
Leave a Reply