The 50mm f/1.8 – Small Wonder!
In this post guest poster Prajneet Singh from BeyondMegapixels takes a look at the humble 50mm lens.
In today’s digital world, technology has made everything easier to reach, with many devices working as more than one device, and universal remotes to control them. The simple purpose – convenience. And that is what happened with the advent of zoom lenses. In today’s date, with high zoom compacts flooding the market, and manufacturers making lenses that zoom in far enough to bring a bird sitting 50 feet away seem as if it is sitting in front of your lens, a lot of us are so used to zoom lenses that we simply cannot imagine having a lens without a zoom, however much it may be.

Discovery Lighthouse by wildpianist
But, it is for a fact that the best optical quality is delivered by prime lenses (fixed focal length, no zoom lenses). Why? In simple words, because they use a smaller number of glass elements inside the lens, which means lesser loss of quality, and hence better pictures.
Anyways, this post is not to highlight the advantages of primes over zooms, but to highlight one particular prime lens that I feel is a must use for everyone with an SLR, at least for some time. I am talking about the 50mm prime lens – or the nifty fifty as it is rightly called. At this focal length, these lenses show the same view that you see through your eyes, and so are also referred to as normal lenses.
The 50mm f/1.8 is the least expensive lens at this focal range. And this, dear readers, is a marvel. I’ll keep it very simple… why the 50mm is a must:
- At under $100 starting, it is very very cheap, and an easy buy for the hobbyist with a budget.
- Don’t let the price fool you. The optical quality of even the cheapest 50mm is amazing to say the least, owing to its rather simple design. Much better than many expensive zooms even, this lens is loved mostly for its sharpness and bokeh.
- The nifty fifty is light, small and so very convenient to carry around, whether in your bag, or on your camera.
- Primes in general, and the 50mm especially, are fast lenses i.e. they have bigger apertures that allow you to shoot at high shutter speeds even in low light – one major aspect where most zooms lack. The fastest telephoto I’ve heard of has a max aperture of f/2.8, and the fastest prime I’ve heard of is a 50mm f/0.95!
- Perhaps the most important attribute of all primes, after their optics, is the learning they offer. With a fixed frame of view, the only zoom you have at your disposal is your feet. With this ‘restriction’ one ends up being very careful, and also very creative, with their compositions, and also more involved in the whole photographic process. With time you’ll find that even with zooms, you’ll end up getting more ‘keepers’ because of this. In essence, primes are great exercise for your composition muscles.
Last but not the least, we bust the myth that the 50 mil is used only for portraits and street photography. Mentioned below are some points that show just how versatile this little wonder is:
- Shooting in low light: As mentioned above, the wide aperture lets in more light, allowing you to shoot without flash in low light. This lens is great for shooting indoors where a flash sort of ruins the feel. Of course the wide aperture also means that you’ll have a very shallow depth of field, and hence you need to compose your shot such that you get the subject completely in focus.
- The Reversed Macro: Not all of us can afford a dedicated macro lens. And the good news is that you can use this 50mm as a macro lens by reversing it. You’ll need a reversal ring for that. You lose autofocus, but that’s not all that bad when you’re getting a macro lens at this price. For more on reversing the 50mm for macro, check out this post on DPS.
- The Wide effect: If you don’t have a dedicated wide angle lens, don’t fret. You might not get as wide an angle as with a dedicated lens, but you can still get a wide angle look by moving farther from your subject, and using a smaller aperture (larger f number). This covers a wider area and gives a larger zone of sharpness, just like a wide angle lens.
- The Telephoto effect: Just like above, you can also simulate a telephoto effect by getting close to your subject and opening up the aperture. This gives a nicely blurred background which is a characteristic of telephotos.
- Candid Camera: The fact that this lens offers a field of view just like that of the human eye* i.e. you get what you see, plus the lens’s small size make it a great lens for getting candid shots without getting noticed. In fact, since it sees what you see, you can even shoot without using the viewfinder. Simply point your camera in the direction you’re looking, and click!
- DOF: The large aperture offers extremely shallow depth of field which is another creativity stimulator. One can get some very nice looking photos with imaginative use of the shallow DOF.
- Portraits and Streets: This lens is by far most used for portraiture and street photography and gives some great results in both fields.
*The 50mm replicates the human eye field of view on 35mm film cameras or full frame dSLRs like the Canon 5D and Nikon D3. To get the same field of view on an APS-C camera like the Rebel XSi (450D) or Nikon D90, you’ll need to get a 35mm lens. But even then, the field of view of 50mm lenses on cropped sensors is very good to work with.
I’ve heard some people say that primes are made of cheap glass and are used only to take fancy pictures where half the objects in the frame are blurred. That is clearly the result of ignorance and lack of (correct) information. Agreed the 50 mm is affordable, but primes going up to 500 or even 600mm can be the most expensive lenses in your kit, if you can afford them!
Back in the old days, 50mm used to be the norm in lenses. Today, the zooms have gained mass popularity, and rightly too for the convenience offered. But even then, the 50mm remains a brilliant piece of optical engineering, and I recommend that you try it, especially if you’re a hobbyist or serious amateurs. It won’t cost you that much, and I guarantee that you’ll love it!
50mm Lenses to Consider
Canon 50mm Lenses
Sigma 50mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM Lens for Canon Digital SLR Cameras
Nikon 50mm Lenses
Nikon 50mm f/1.4G SIC SW Prime Nikkor
Sigma 50mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM Lens for Nikon Digital SLR Cameras
Other 50mm Lenses
Check out more of Prajneet Singh’s work at BeyondMegapixels
Tags: 50mm, Lenses, Nifty Fifty





111 Responses to “The 50mm f/1.8 – Small Wonder!” - Add Yours
July 7th, 2009 at 7:43 am
I concur! Nifty fifty is indeed a fine little lens. Although it is little long for general purpose photography on a crop body on FF it is very handy. I frequently recommend this lens to people who are entering DSLR world as a kit lens or as a first second lens, none of them were disappointed. For canon shooters, I would recommend to get Mark I version of the NiftyFifty as it has better build and wont fall apart within a first year of use, although it might be little more expensive and harder to get.
July 7th, 2009 at 7:56 am
Just wanted to say thank you for putting a lens from Pentax!
I have one and I love it… It does ask you to have more creativity because there is no zoom.
July 7th, 2009 at 8:01 am
When telling new users that they can substitute one focal length for another, it’s irresponsible not to clarify the importance of understanding perspective. Moving back far enough to make a 50mm (especially on a crop body) give the same field of view as a wide angle radically changes the perspective, and thus the “look.”
Similarly, taking a shorter lens and using it for close-up work provides a “look” which is in fact the opposite of the “telephoto look,” which is mainly characterized by distant perspective. To achieve a telephoto “look” with a 50mm, the best approach is to step back a bit and crop in, which will provide the same perspective and field of view one would obtain with a longer lens.
July 7th, 2009 at 8:07 am
I love my nifty-fifty and use it a ton. Even though I shoot a D300, I prefer this over the 35mm because of the sharpness.
July 7th, 2009 at 8:08 am
So glad you wrote this post, I have been throwing around the idea of buying one for months….now I am sold. Great advice.
July 7th, 2009 at 8:27 am
Hi Prajneet,
In flickr you wrote (about spider’s photo): “was taken on some fall leaves with the 50mm reversed to some extension tubes”. Could you tell which maker’s reverse ring and extension tubes you are using ?
July 7th, 2009 at 8:29 am
I’d argue against recommending the Nikkor 50mm f1.4G. It’s the first lens I bought myself when I upgraded to an SLR. While the f1.4 is great, and it has a wonderful optical quality, there are a few things I don’t like about it:
1) Its much heavier than most nifty fifties.
2) the lack of an aperture ring, thus it cant be used as a reverse macro lens.
its probably great as a studio lens though.
July 7th, 2009 at 8:54 am
Nifty fifties can be useful lenses, but I’ve got to ask whether the author really knows what they are talking about?
> “The fastest telephoto I’ve heard of has a max aperture of f/2.8,”
Really?
I suppose it depends on your definition of “telephoto”. But if we settle for a “telephoto” being longer than a “standard” lens then there’s:
the Canon 85mm f/1.2 and 1.8, 100mm f/2, 135mm f/2 and 200mm f/2
plus the Nikon 85mm f/1.4 and f/1.8, 105mm f/2, 135mm f/2 and 200mm f/2
All of which have a maximum aperture greater than f/2.8.
Steve
July 7th, 2009 at 9:04 am
nice helpful post! 50mm 1.8 is always the first lens i recommend to my friends getting a dslr.
July 7th, 2009 at 9:27 am
Thank you Prajneet.
I love my 50mm1.4! I wanted something to help make me more creative. It fits the job perfectly. Half the time I go out shooting, I take off my zoom and dedicate it to the 50. Nifty-fifty’s are great learning lenses. Everybody should have one.
July 7th, 2009 at 9:34 am
I love my nifty fifty!
Another use — Astrophotography. Taken with my nifty fifty stopped down to F/4. Astrophotography is pretty demanding on a lens, and I had very little success at larger apertures. But to get the same clarity with a zoom, I might have to shoot 4x as long at F/8, and it still wouldn’t look as good.
And my favorite, a cane toad
July 7th, 2009 at 9:46 am
Not only was the 50mm the norm, when I bought my Minolta XGM back in 1981 or 82 (hard to remember) the 50mm came with almost all non-pro cameras as a kit. Yep great lens!
July 7th, 2009 at 10:11 am
For quite some time now, I’m using my nifty fifty partnered with a Canon 5D Mark II and I think it made my shots better than before. With 50mm lens, I was forced to always rethink how I would take my shots since I can only use 1 focal length. Change angle, find better subject and composition, etc. It might take several photowalks to get used to using 50mm but i think it will help you become a better photographer!
Have a nice day!
July 7th, 2009 at 10:16 am
Lets not forget about the Nikon 35mm f/1.8G
I’m a newbie in the world of DSLRs and this was the first lens I purchased (after my kit lens), and it’s brilliant. My 18-105 lens almost never leaves my bag now. The only downside I’ve found so far is that it doesn’t have an aperture ring so doing flipped macro’s is trickier.
July 7th, 2009 at 10:18 am
Its true. My 18-200 VR (~800$) very rarely is the one on my d200. The 50mm 1.8 (~100$) spends much more time on the mount.
July 7th, 2009 at 10:31 am
and the fastest prime I’ve heard of is a 50mm f/0.95!
f/0.95 ??
I believe that is impossible. Math and photographic optics FAIL.
July 7th, 2009 at 10:41 am
http://en.leica-camera.com/photography/m_system/lenses/5915.html
“After more than 30 years, Leica breaks its own record and introduces the world’s highest-speed aspherical lens: the LEICA NOCTILUX-M 50 mm f/0.95 ASPH.”
July 7th, 2009 at 10:42 am
It’s quite possible to have F/0.95.
Zeiss 50mm F/0.7 lens
July 7th, 2009 at 10:52 am
The 50mm 1.8 was the first lens recommended to me and has been my favorite for many years. The results are incredible and some photographers who believe the 1.4L is the only way to go have been quite surprised by the results of this sub $100 lens. Still my favorite.
July 7th, 2009 at 11:38 am
I must have one!
thanks DPS…
July 7th, 2009 at 11:53 am
Sorry, but 50mm lens does not offer you same field of view as human eye. Not of full frame, not on crop. Single human eye has angle of view of roughly 120 degrees, whereas 50mm focus – roughly 42 degrees. Two eyes intersected vision zone is about 32-36 degrees or so, so its not “sharp human eye” zone either. People should really really stop repeating that nonsense that someone put out on internet.
July 7th, 2009 at 11:56 am
I couldn’t agree more with this post. For my D90 I skipped the kit lens and bought the 35mm f/2 to give me a 50mm equivalent.
July 7th, 2009 at 12:09 pm
One of the first lenses I purchased after I got my first DSLR. At the time, recommended by numerous accolades and its low starter price of about 100 bucks, its still one of my favorite lenses to this date despite owning several high powered (and price) zooms/primes. If there is a MUST HAVE for your lens collection, this one firmly belongs in that list.
July 7th, 2009 at 12:31 pm
I own a Canon 50mm f/1.8 II lens. I must say it’s a very affordable and good one. I recommended it to someone who was looking into purchasing his first DSLR.
The B&W portrait is beautiful.
July 7th, 2009 at 12:58 pm
Sound advice here, i recently bought a 50mm lens and it was my purchase of the year!
July 7th, 2009 at 1:31 pm
Just a note that for reverse macro you don’t need the lens of the same brand or mount type as the camera. Here’s what I did with a Pentax 50mm on my Canon Rebel XT at f/2.8.
http://thedreamerskingdom.org/photoblog/index.php?showimage=240
And you don’t need the latest and the greatest either. Take a look at the used camera shop for 50mm with aperture control, get reverse adapter and ready to be amazed.
July 7th, 2009 at 2:25 pm
I have a 50mm f/1.4 nikkor and I LOVE it, beautiful, easy shots, especially when shooting in manual mode. Best investment I’ve made so far.
July 7th, 2009 at 3:52 pm
I didn’t even consider getting my XSi with the kit lens, I just straight up went with the 50mm f/1.8. I have never regretted my decision :]
I am definitely a prime addict and when I look around for a new lens I almost never look at zooms. My next lens with either be the 50mm 1.4 for the 85mm 1.8.
Glad to see the primes get some love!
July 7th, 2009 at 5:13 pm
I love my Nikon 50mm f1.8, it was super affordable and the picture quality is great for the price point. Often times my 50mm is the only lens I keep on my camera. Because its fast and light. I love my 50mm, in fact right now I’m trying to strictly shoot with my 50mm and start a series on my flickr page with nothing but 50mm shots.
July 7th, 2009 at 7:34 pm
There is also an exellent 50mm from Carl Zeiss Planar T* 1,4/50 which is available for canon,nikon,pentax and M42 mount. It lacks auto focusing, but I love it, cause I like to focus manually.
July 7th, 2009 at 8:08 pm
I bought the Canon 50mm f1/8 a few years ago and it’s hardly ever seen service. Using my zoom is just too tempting, especially when out with the family.
I’ll happily take the reduced quality of the zoom because of the convenience offered. A bit of unsharp mask afterwards does wonders. Try walking back and forth with a prime when a 2yro is hanging off you!
July 7th, 2009 at 8:12 pm
I’m shooting with a Canon EF 50mm 1:1.8 Mark I since almost 10 years now. I love this lens, even my most expensive L-Lenses are no match in sharpness. If you’re planning to buy an EF 50mm 1:1.8 II, try to get a Mark I on Ebay (or elsewhere) first. You’ll get an even better lens with metal body and bayonet-mount instead of plastics and it comes with a focus scale (for going hyperfocal and stuff)…
July 7th, 2009 at 8:42 pm
Will be my next purchase! I was looking for a lens that allows me to take lighted indoor portraits and I’ve been suggested of using this one (the nikkor 50mm f/1.8).. I really think this is the best choice for quality and price!
July 7th, 2009 at 8:53 pm
Second lens i bought for my pentax k200d was an unbelievably cheap 50mm f/1.7 manual lens.
I was blown away at the sharpness compared to my kit 16-50mm and sigma 18-200mm.
After only using the lens for about 6 months i think it has made me a much better photographer too as the full manual forced me to learn about proper exposures and the lack of zoom made me slow down and think about the composure of the photo.
Oh and did i mention it was cheap =D (only $40 aus)
July 7th, 2009 at 9:14 pm
Every DSLR owner should own a 50mm lens. In fact that’s what I have mounted on my 5D which is sitting right beside me as I type this. The first question I ask when someone says they are planning to buy a new lens is “do you own a nifty 50?” If not buy that before you buy anything else. Too bad there’s not a nifty 35 (sub $100 35mm for crop bodies).
July 7th, 2009 at 9:36 pm
I have Nikkor AF 50mm F1.4 ( non-D version). I love my 50mm. It’s handy in many ways and make me very creative. I think 50mm F1.4D is still in production and I prefer that over G version.
July 7th, 2009 at 10:15 pm
Hello Ben,
I am considering buying a 1.4 instead of my Nikkor AF 50mm F/1.8. Could you show us some pictures you have made with your lens?
Here is some of my pics I took with my 1.8
http://laci.blog.hu/2009/05/15/bodor_adam
http://m.blog.hu/la/laci/image/fotok/orult1.jpg
http://laci.blog.hu/2009/07/01/bodil_niska
http://laci.blog.hu/2009/07/06/unom_14
July 7th, 2009 at 10:21 pm
Nice Article, but i wont concider the Sigma 50 mm f 1,4 small ;) [but i have it and i love it!]
July 7th, 2009 at 10:26 pm
I cannot help but come into support for this article giving big love to the nifty fifty and most of all to prime lenses! It is so so true, that primes offer so much value for money, less complicated construction = easier to achieve great quality = great pictures at significantly lower prices!!!
I used to be a believer in the big and bestter f2.8 zoomers but I have since sold them for two excellent prime lens which challenge my composition skills and indeed deliver top quality photographs…. and you know, I just love creamy bokeh and nothing delivers creamy bokeh like a great prime lens :)
July 7th, 2009 at 11:39 pm
I fully agree with you! I’ve just bought one during my visit to NYC (Canon 50mm f/1.8) for a mere 90$ and get out to take some shoots… which lense can give you such a quality/sharpness for such an amount of bucks!?
Question, adding image stabilization would make this lense even better?
July 8th, 2009 at 12:07 am
I agreed this is quite a good lens for the price. I’ve done many high end fashion work with the use of this lens. The only draw back I feel is with the Auto Focus and focus time. Sometimes it is a bit tricky. But optical quality is superb.
July 8th, 2009 at 12:08 am
Although I agree with some of the points in the article, mainly that it is a great lens for the price, I have several issues with the writer and writing style.
The author says it is a “normal” lens. What he fails to indicate is that this is in FF (FX) cameras and sensors. A 35mm (such as Nikon’s 35mm/F2) is a “normal”lens in cropped (DX) sensors. In fact the 50mm FL is a little awkward in DX as it is not a normal lens, yet it is not a proper tele or portrait lens (where the 85mm/1.8 would be more appropriate).
It is true, the lens’ optical quality is excellent for the price (the mount is a cheaper plastic build, but you can’t quibble for the low price). I have had this lens for years and it works as advertised, yet I find I use the 35/2 (or the newer 35/1.8) way more due to the focal length.
The author states…
By far the most used? Care to back that assertion up? I am mainly a street photographer and I can tell you this is not the case with me (due to the DX FL issue mentioned above). I find in my case (and many other street photographers I’ve seen), that lenses such as the 24-70mm, 35/2 and 70-200VR are much more prevalent in street photography.
There are also some copy editing issues with the article It should have been checked for grammar to keep the publication’s high standards.
In general, it is a good article, that conveys the points across but not up to your usual high quality standards.
July 8th, 2009 at 12:46 am
First, another re-emphasis that on APS-C, the equivalent is roughly 33 mm.
Can anyone comment on the construction quality of the cheaper “nifty fifty” lenses? I’ve seen some remarks that the mounts may damage the camera body over time and others that the lenses have practically fallen apart.
Thanks!
July 8th, 2009 at 1:17 am
I love playing with my 50mm f1.8. Well typically I have my 70-200mm f2.8L IS lens on my camera, but occasionally I’ll switch to my 50mm and force myself to rethink some of my photos. Granted on a crop sensor body its more of a 80mm lens, but still its still fixed focal which forces me to move my body in and out to composite a shot.
I broke my first 50mm (camera fell over…) but got myself my 2nd 50mm for only $70cdn, brand new never opened. I LOVE the lens, and it makes for carrying my camera (+grip) around a lot easier too. easier to bring it to more social events than bringing the bigger 70-200 ;)
July 8th, 2009 at 3:27 am
I have an Olympus E410… It’s my first DSLR and I’m still just using the kit lenses. I really want to get a 50mm – especially after reading this article. Could you suggest a good lens for my camera?
July 8th, 2009 at 4:05 am
You’ve convinced me. I was thinking on getting a 10-20 because my kit lenses are a 18-55, so I already have the 50 mm on it, but the “don’t use the viewfinder, just shot” point sounds really attractive to me.
However, I don’t understand what you say about the sensors. Yeah, some of friends have already tried to explain it to me but I’m silly. In this case I don’t know whether I should follow one of the Amazon links you’ve posted or look for a 35 mm for my EOS 400D.
Cheers!
July 8th, 2009 at 7:23 am
Wow, those photos are amazing. I really been thinking to buy one of these small fast lens from Nikon for my D60 and do some experimenting.
I totally will be buying one of the lenses you recommended from Nikon. Probably the f/1.8D
July 8th, 2009 at 7:38 am
Very interesting but I have one question: do you mean 50mm on digital or any 50mm.
If I use my old Nikor 50mm lens , it is going to be around 80mm… am I wrong ?
Thanks for the answer
July 8th, 2009 at 8:33 am
i’m using a 50mm f1.4 as well, i love the speed and dof that it offers me. i love it so much, i kinda totally abandoned the 18-55mm kit lens of my D40.
July 8th, 2009 at 8:49 am
Stuart: I’ve got the Canon 50mm F/1.8 and it’s obviously cheaply made — lightweight, thin plastic housing, auto focus isn’t as smooth and reliable compared to more expensive lenses… The bayonet mount on it is plastic but it’s a sturdy, heavy duty plastic — I haven’t had any problems at all. It has held up fine on the camera and in the camera bag, but any sort of accident will surely rip the thing apart.
Of course, if you DO break it, you can replace it for under 100 bucks. You can drop more than that on a filter! The image quality is very good, it’s quite fast, and the price is right. If you’ve already got a selection of fast lenses, maybe it’s not terribly useful, but if you’re on a budget like me… Well, it expands what I can do with my camera and for almost no money. :-)
July 8th, 2009 at 11:56 am
@Jacky
It depends. 50mm is 50,mm no matter what. In a camera with a full frame sensor (FF or in Nikon parlance FX), it is the same as in a film camera (35mm negative). In a cropped sensor camera (APS-C or in Nikon parlance DX), the sensor is smaller so the distance and coverage is different on a same focal length lens. The ratio is roughly 1.5 so a 50mm lens used in a DX sensor (e.g. D90) will give you a similar coverage as a 75mm in a full frame (e.g D700). It is a little complicated but Wikpedia explains it better: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crop_factor
July 8th, 2009 at 2:38 pm
Hay..guest .,,i need your advise..i had a lens nikon 50mm f/1.8D.I.am still looking for a proper body. My planning is to buy a D300 but am thinking long term invest..for pro lenses such 24-70mm and 70 -200mm
following my understanding those lenses only work well or fit on D 700 or D3..so my question is which one i have to choise.., cos am getting serious on that hobbies ..please help ,,
July 8th, 2009 at 2:57 pm
I enjoyed the piece a great deal. For those just moving up to DSLR, the 50 is a terrific recommendation. One thing that I’ve found though in making this recommendation is that persuading people that the “foot zoom” is a substitute for the real thing is a hard sell. The problem is that there are a host of situations where I foot zoom is literally impossible. Examples: Zoos, sporting events, macro type shots (I know you can reverse, but for someone new to DSLR, the all-manual reversing trick is not really a selling point.)
I’ve found that the best selling point is the quality of the shots. I keep sample images of the same shot from the 18-55 kit lens shot at ~50mm and the 50mm 1.8 (Canon). There’s a world of difference. I think the quality of the image is the main selling point. Everyone understands that.
July 8th, 2009 at 10:13 pm
@vije
The question is off-topic, but either lens you mentioned is a great pro lens and both work well with a D300 (DX) and a D700/D3 (FX). I have a D300 and as a rule, I do not purchase DX-lenses anymore (only have two from some time ago), and all my newer (old old-Ai) lenses are full-frame so I can still use them in the future, should I buy a D700.
July 8th, 2009 at 10:37 pm
Hay.. Alex ..thank’s for your suggestion..i know the question was wrong place.
July 9th, 2009 at 7:16 am
@Prajneet
Great post. It’s good to see a detailed piece on something that’s a good balance between price and quality. Looking forward to seeing more of you on DPS. Good luck!
@Alex Feldstein
I think that the use of the nifty fifty in street photography, according to the writer, is very high compared to other lenses; it might not strictly mean that it is “the most used lens, ever”. It’s more a matter of language than fact, imho.
Also, with respect to every point, including its being a “normal lens”, we must not forget that we’re looking at a combination of inexpensive and effective here, which changes the standards of judgment a little.
Most of all, let’s welcome the new writer and thank him for his insights. I’m sure his posts will get better with time, as far as the grammar issues are concerned.
July 9th, 2009 at 1:50 pm
The 50mm is a great lens. Anybody who owns a DSLR should own one! lol
Heres some sets of shots I did using the Canon 50mm f1.8
Nifty Fifty
Cherry Blossom
July 9th, 2009 at 3:59 pm
@Nick – Thank you for making the clarification there. I guess its just a difference of opinion, different perspective you see ;)
@Steve – I was referring to telehoto zooms of course! Primes will obviously be faster. And even in telephoto zooms, the fastest is f/2.0 (Zuiko 35-100mm), which I learn after writing the article. This is of course going by the definition of telephotos being simply longer than 50mm. If we talk about focal lengths longer han 100mm, the fastest is still an f/2.8.
July 9th, 2009 at 4:58 pm
@Nikonboy
Try this search
http://ben-sketchbook.blogspot.com/search?q=+50mm+F1.4
Not all of them are great, but I like some of them.
July 10th, 2009 at 2:19 am
I own a Canon Xsi and don’t even use the kit lens anymore really… the kit lens is so versatile because of the zoom, but after seeing how bright and sharp the pics from my 50mm f/1.8 are, I just stick with that. I REALLY want the f/1.4 even more now, but it’s such a big price difference [$89 for my f/1.8, and about $400 for the f/1.4]…. I don’t know if the end results are worth all that extra money. Anyone have experience with both?
Here’s my fave pic/pics I’ve taken with my 50mm f/1.8. I don’t like flash photography, I love natural light [another reason I love this lens so much], so am amazed with how bright and sharp these pics turned out – no flash was used.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/maryannmattox/3580011735/
July 10th, 2009 at 2:40 am
Love my “nifty fifty”. I don’t use it as much as I should, but it’s the absolute best when it comes to night landscapes since it’s almost impossible to focus my 18-55 zoom lens in the dark. This lens has an infinity setting, so I simply move the ring all the way over and I have sharp focus.
It also works excellent as a reverse ring macro lens.
I’m motivated by this post to pop that lens on tonight at Chicago’s famous Green Mill Jazz club and give it a real workout!
July 10th, 2009 at 2:52 am
The 50mm 1.8 is great. An amazing value. Was my first lens after the kit lens. Mine is a Canon and set me back $79USD. But it is very light and plasticky. After getting a few L series lenses I decided to upgrade my 50 to the Canon f/1.2 L. WOW. Ok very spendy at $1600USD, but did I mention WOW? Sharp as a tack and at 1.2 the DOF is razor thin. Plus low light shooting is incredible.
July 10th, 2009 at 3:27 am
Totally agree. My photography instructor convinced me to buy my Nikon 1.4 50mm and it is by far the best thing I have ever invested in (outside of my dslr digital camera body.) The sheer quality of the photos is unbelieveable. Keep on preaching!
July 10th, 2009 at 3:31 am
Mary: It depends on what lenses you already have and what you do with your camera :-)
The f/1.4 is nicer than the f/1.8, particularly in that sub f/2 range. It’s a more solid lens. But there’s so many OTHER great lenses! For me at least, I’d rather spend it on something that gives me something more different, like the 35mm f/2.0 (or 35mm f/1.4 if you’ve got a hefty budget). Or the 70-200mm f/2.8 is a beauty. Or the 10-22mm superwide. :-)
July 10th, 2009 at 4:23 am
For those using Olympus 4/3 DSLRs the 25mm F2.8 pancake provides the same effect. It is a wonderful little compact lens! It has given me all new perspective to DSLR shooting.
July 10th, 2009 at 4:24 am
I have a Pentax MX and a manual focus 50mm lens. It was bought by my father before my birth and he has really taken some wonderful shots with it. I also use it from time to time for portrait and street, and also as a macro lens by reversing it.
July 10th, 2009 at 4:38 am
@Sergei:
it might be that the human has a different view angle, but when I determine the zoom setting which corresponds to the naked eye view via opening the normally closed eye with the camera readied and searching for the zoom position with the least strain, I get 50mm. Since this is with a Nikor DX, it might actually disprove my point but I’m too untaught to wrap my brain around these numbers ;-)
July 10th, 2009 at 4:41 am
After reading this, I think I must own a 50 mm f/2.8 for my Nikon D60.
Thanks.
July 10th, 2009 at 7:33 am
I shot with a Canon 40D and use a 70 – 200 f/2.8 IS L and a 24 – 105 f/4 L lens.
BUT, value for money, the Canon 50mm f/1.8 CANNOT BE BEATEN. The sharpness out of the camera will beat any kit lens hands down. Simply put, I love this lens and use it at any opportunity, it is ALWAYS in my camera bag (unlike my 70 – 200 which is only taken when I know for certain it will be used).
The 50mm prime is also a great tool in teaching beginners the basics of photography.
And lets not forget that on crop sensor bodies, the 50mm prime is a FANTASTIC portrait lens and well worthy of the reputation they have gained.
If you do not have one – go and buy one NOW.
July 10th, 2009 at 8:51 am
While still in the “point and shoot” cocoon, it is hoped someday I can fly as a competent photographer.
There is reluctance to buy equipment beyond what came with a Sony DSLR A350 with
two lenses, mainly due to ignorance as how to make the best use of something.
Most articles suggest a “nifty fifty” as passed its time, but what swayed me to buy one was that it is supposedly better in the “what you see is what you get department. Now comes the question what is the best use of the lens. The assumption is almost that it can handle my two main interests equally well, landscapes and city’s, although using a Telephoto is probably best when long distances are involved.
July 10th, 2009 at 9:03 am
This is my favourite lens, I try to use it for all my live band work as it is excellent for low light situations !
July 10th, 2009 at 12:43 pm
You don’t mention Sony/Minolta… their primes, their FF Sony A900 (only Can’s and Nik’s), APS-C cams either…
Not fair and not good for you.
Regards,
July 10th, 2009 at 3:36 pm
Well, interesting topic I see! Bought my first DSLR a few months back and only got a 50mm 1.4 for it. Have used it exclusively since and ABSOLUTELY LOVE IT! It is sharp and allows for so much creativity. Great value for money. Will probably pick up a 50mm 1.8 for my wife’s new D90 eventually just because they are so affordable. She has a 35mm 1.8 left over from her crappy-sensored D60 (manual focus only for the nifty-fifties on this body) that she is just starting to use on the D90. So far it has been very impressive too, quality wise.
In my honest opinion (we shoot a lot of portraits) the 35mm intrudes on the subject. For example if you like tight crops and are shooting young children, they will stop what they are doing and pay attention to the camera, becuase you are too close to shoot candidly. You could always crop in post, but that depends on your shooting preferences I guess. The 50mm on the DX sensor provides more room between you and your subject, which goes a LONG way if you prefer to shoot more candidly. The reverse is true though – the 35mm perspective on a DX sensor is so much better for a lot of street and all-round shots. While the image quality is pretty even, the creative and low-light abilities of the 50mm 1.4, to me, make very worthwhile. It doesn’t do everything, but what it does – it does very well, and it is fun and simple to use.
What I really miss actually is more the wide angle capabilities, rather than telephoto. I pretty sure that my next lens will be the 20mm 1.8. It’s hard to go back to slower and lower image quality zooms once you’ve gotten used to the primes. 50mm totally sucks for group shots and even some full-body shots where you can’t move back (ie: concert). It also will cause you to put down your camera and just enjoy the birds, rather than trying to capture them. I find that I always have my little compact Canon with me though and prefer this for extreme macros, zoom and convenience (for only $270!!)
Overall, the 50mm 1.4 seems to me to be simpy the best all-round lens for quality and creatively oriented serious photographers. One question: does anyone else find that their camera’s metering system over-exposes with the fast primes and that a correct exposure requires you to compensate on the light meter to what should be a under-exposure?
July 10th, 2009 at 5:38 pm
“Primes in general, and the 50mm especially, are fast lenses i.e. they have bigger apertures that allow you to shoot at high shutter speeds even in low light – one major aspect where most zooms lack. The fastest telephoto I’ve heard of has a max aperture of f/2.8, and the fastest prime I’ve heard of is a 50mm f/0.95!”
There ARE zooms with max aperture of F2.0.
Zuiko Digital ED 14-35mm F2.0
Zuiko Digital ED 35-100mm F2.0
July 10th, 2009 at 9:00 pm
Hmmm is it just me as I can’t find a 50mm for my Pentak K100D for under $650 and that is getting it from the States? I was edging towards a Macro but the 50mm was my second choice, I think it is ahead after this great article I want to go get one tomorrow!
“The 50mm f/1.8 is the least expensive lens at this focal range. And this, dear readers, is a marvel. I’ll keep it very simple… why the 50mm is a must:
At under $100 starting, it is very very cheap, and an easy buy for the hobbyist with a budget.”
July 11th, 2009 at 2:12 am
I don’t use mine as often as I should; I’m inspired to give it some more love thanks to this article.
I got terrific results at an indoor dance concert with my Canon 40D and the 50mm 1.4 USM lens combo.
Check ‘em out here
http://www.servianphotography.com/gallery/8118404_BF7fd#529376631_HhxNq
July 12th, 2009 at 10:20 pm
Very interesting article – been considering a prime lens for some time
I’m using a Nikon D90 – if money isn’t an issue would you recommend the 50mm or the 35mm?
Unfortunately in the UK our lenses are much more expensive not that I’ve researched that much yet but the 50 is £119 & the 35 £219
As money is an issue do I wait a while & get the 35 when I can or bite the bullet take the 50 and just end up with a relatively cheap quality lens?
Thanks
July 12th, 2009 at 10:21 pm
@sheldonc: no, they are not. Amazon US charges $90 for P&P, do you still they they’re expensive in the UK? I’m gonna buy in Amazon UK, no doubt.
July 13th, 2009 at 12:05 pm
I own a Pentax K100d. I ordered a 50mm f1.4 lens from B&h Photo. Cost was $199. haven’t used it much, but I did last night, though, and was delighted with the ability to shoot in low light. I intend to use it lots more. Thanks for listing a Pentax lens. I feel like I am the only Pentax lover out there!
July 13th, 2009 at 12:13 pm
@Kathy Burkman: Not at all! I am a Pentax lover too! My father bought a Pentax MX 35mm SLR just before my birth and the 50mm F/1.4 prime was his only lens for the next seven years. He surely took some amazing shots with that lens. I use that camera now and I really love that lens for its fast speed and shallow DOF. I plan to buy a Pentax K7 later this year and I plan to use this lens on that camera too occasionally.
July 13th, 2009 at 1:58 pm
Despite all the rave reviews for the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8, I’m afraid to buy it. Amazon has a lot of user comments that state how easy it is for the lens to break because of its cheap plastic construction. I realize that for the price, the lens is easy to replace, but that’s not my issue. The issue is that in some cases, the lens breaks apart while attached to the camera body and then the lens is impossible to remove without sending the whole thing to a Canon service center. I cannot afford to risk my precious 40D with this lens.
I’m considering the EF 50mm f/1.4, but it has a known tendency for AF malfunction.
July 13th, 2009 at 11:17 pm
I’ve recently got a 50mm 1.8 lens for my birthday and I absolutely love it! The image quality is fantastic and it’s incredibly sharp, and I love the bokeh I can create with it.
I also shot all of my SoFoBoMo photo book project with it: http://www.sofobomo.org/2009/books/Mandy73/food-glorious-food/
July 13th, 2009 at 11:51 pm
I have the EF 50mm 1.8, and bokeh isn’t one of its strong points. Sure, you can get a small depth of field by using it wide open, but that’s not the same as GOOD bokeh – what you get is harsh, edgy hexagons, not nicely rounded bokeh.
July 14th, 2009 at 5:39 am
I just got this lens and it is like MAGIC. A must have for all levels of photographers.
July 14th, 2009 at 7:16 am
i considered buying a 50mm but Nikon just released their new 35mm f1.8 … patiently waited for the availability but it’s all worth it… prime lens are great addition
July 14th, 2009 at 10:43 am
The “nifty fifty” was the first lens I bought. I love it and recommend it to others. I like to use it to take photos of my kitty cat, and have taken some decent architectural shots and night shots with it too.
July 14th, 2009 at 10:43 am
Richard: The lens is certainly less sturdy than lenses 5x as expensive, but it’s not so flimsy it’d break with normal use. If I had to drop my camera with any of my lenses on it, it’d be the nifty fifty. Sure, it’d wreck the lens, but it’s the cheapest lens I own. I can’t imagine having to have Canon remove it — the release for the bayonet mount is on the camera, not the lens.
Alejandro: The 50mm f/1.8 has a 5 bladed aperture, so it’d be impressive indeed to get hexagons ;-) Shooting wide open, you get circles. Shooting with a smaller aperture will get you pentagons. But shooting with nearly any lens with a reduced aperture is going to get you sharp pentagons/hexagons/septagons on out of focus specular highlights, yes? The bokeh may not be spectacularly good but I don’t think it’s particularly terrible either.
I picked the harshest example of specular highlights I could set up — it shows them at f/1.8 and f/4.5.
Here
July 14th, 2009 at 12:20 pm
@ John
“I’ve found that the best selling point is the quality of the shots. I keep sample images of the same shot from the 18-55 kit lens shot at ~50mm and the 50mm 1.8 (Canon). There’s a world of difference. I think the quality of the image is the main selling point. Everyone understands that.”
I’d be interested in seeing those comparisons…trying to convince the hubby of the difference between the nifty and the kit lens.
July 14th, 2009 at 4:24 pm
Oh Kathy really? Where is B&H photo? I am in SA but I am sure they will ship. I can get it locally for $580 but $199 sounds much better!!!! Nice to hear from you Kathy and Sugata – yes I too feel like I am on the outer with a Pentax. I love my K100D. It gets thrown in my hand bag and dragged everywhere and as it was not expensive I am not precious with it. I call it my practice DSLR as it’s my first and I knew I would be trading up soon anyway…. I am excited about the K7!
July 14th, 2009 at 10:36 pm
This shot was done with my 50 1.8
http://www.ninelivephotography.ca/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/20090627_sarah-kevin_1069-web.jpg
at 1.8 the DOF was too much, I had to bring it down to about 3.5 to still see the couple in the background.
While I’d love a 50 1.4 or 1.2, this one still does me fine.
July 14th, 2009 at 10:49 pm
@jacq: B&H Photo is in New York City. I don’t know where else they have their stores. I am excited about the K7 too!
@Alan Nielsen: Yes, sometimes the DoF is too shallow at 1.4. See this shot:
http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/ljANmj4a5dtj65GFMtUbVA?authkey=Gv1sRgCPPap_L65YLvoAE&feat=directlink
If I didn’t tell you, you would hardly be able to make out the Empire State Building in the background. On the other hand, it was almost dark when this shot was taken, and I was using 400ASA film, so anything other than 1.4 would not have worked, especially for a handheld shot.
July 14th, 2009 at 11:24 pm
Jacq – B&H is in NYC. You can see all of their offerings on their website, as well as order a catalog. I researched the lens on the Pentax website, then ordered what I wanted. I hope it hasn’t gone up in price! I wouldn’t want to give you the wrong info. Good luck!
July 15th, 2009 at 1:53 am
I surely agree with almost every poster here about the 50MM. I have a Nikkor 50MM F1.8 AIS and am entirely enamored with it. The colors and contrast produce pictures that make it seem like it has ED glass in it. I shoot landscape with the 28MM F2, the 50MM and the 85MM F1.8. Love that fast glass!! I’ve recently gone back to primes from zooms. I recently took a picture of a dock at F11 with some lobster traps in the foreground at sunset using the 50. The sharpness, the contrast and the colors were amazing. When I got the slide on the light table, everything just popped out. When you shoot vertically with the 50 it could almost pass as a slight wide angle. Anyway, if you’re thinking about getting one, DO IT!!!
July 16th, 2009 at 1:19 am
Thanks to your article, I’ve decided to get a 50 mm equivalent for my Nikon D60. I’ll go for the Nikkor AF-S 35mm since my camera has a cropping factor of 1.5.
July 16th, 2009 at 12:25 pm
I got mine under amazon for 132 dollars and that 50mm 1.8 is an adorable lens. I start to leave my lens along with my D200 camera. I’m very eager to be on my vacation for 2 weeks starting the 1st of Aug due to my young daughter expecting to have her first baby. That will be my 3rd grandchild. I’m gonna take alot of photo with my new len.
July 17th, 2009 at 1:26 am
I have the Sigma 30mm on a Canon 400D and it’s more or less the only lens I ever would want to use. It’s superb quality and versatility in low light conditions make it impossible for me to take it off.
July 18th, 2009 at 12:19 am
what’s about Sony 50mm f/1.4?
July 21st, 2009 at 8:17 pm
Thanks for this GREAT article – just the information I was looking for! I’m about to upgrade from my trusty compact digital and didn’t know where to start, especially in the lenses department – but this has clarified everything and I’m sure of making an informed choice now rather than an expensive mistake. THANK YOU!!!
July 23rd, 2009 at 9:23 pm
I have a great affection for my classic Pentax Takumar 50mm lenses. Sharp, contrasty results with beautiful bokeh. Still very useful lenses!
July 24th, 2009 at 12:53 am
I can only comment on Sony/Minolta 50’s as I own a Sony. Boy would I like to live in the U.S. Sub $100 for a 50mm lens? I WISH!!!! Over this of the pond you cannot get a Sony/Minolta 50mm for sub £250 unless you mug some poor soul of theirs.
July 24th, 2009 at 11:28 am
Here is my picture that I took with 50mm/1.8.It is a FABLOUS len and sharp too.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2650/3749816619_8f99565f79.jpg
July 26th, 2009 at 12:38 pm
I’m rather disappointed to see that Nikon’s 50mm f/1.2 failed to make the list. I use mine nearly every day. At f/2, it is supposed to be one of the sharpest lenses Nikon has ever made. I absolutely love the feel that it gives images.
Here’s an un-scientific but fun comparison of the DOF of a 50mm f/1.8 on a crop sensor camera (Nikon D100) and a 50mm f/1.2 on a full frame camera (Nikon D700):
http://annemariecarson.blogspot.com/2009/05/50-vs-50.html
A collection of images taken with the Nikkor 50mm f/1.2:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/annemariecarsonphotography/tags/50mmf12/
So why leave this one out? As far as I know, you can still obtain one by special order through Nikon and they are still in limited production………
July 27th, 2009 at 3:37 pm
I have this lens and I will never take it off my Canon body. This lens helped me understand depth of field and aperture much more effectively than my kit lens.
July 30th, 2009 at 5:39 am
Expecting a baby in October, so just stepped up to a DSLR from a point and shoot. A professional photog. friend of mine helped me decided on the T1i for an entry level DSLR and also strongly suggested that I get the the 50mm f1.8 II to help me learn about manual settings. I’ve had the camera for just a few days but I have played almost exclusively with the 50mm over the kit lens. My very first shot with the lens (and my first ever shot in full manual mode) is linked. Already loving this lens and can’t wait to learn more with it.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/24656256@N06/3769236453/
August 7th, 2009 at 3:00 pm
this is the lens i purchased together with my first D-SLR Canon 350D long time ago.. truly a wonder piece for its price.. it taught me a lot about dof and framing.. i just love it like other owners.. here me Canon.. if i were you, i would rather sell this lens as a kit with entry level D-SLR instead of 18-55 to make the buyer happy and loyal.
August 8th, 2009 at 6:09 pm
hi there, I own Nikon 50mm 1.4 and uses with my D90 and many at time the I find the the pictures taken at 1.4 is not very sharp and tend to out of focus, I read somewhere that, these prime lenses have something like sweet focal points and f numbers. Is this true ? and also to a large extend when i tried with 3.2 and 5.6 the lens is more sharp and gives good quality pics. So please support me with some knowledge of Sweet focal points of these prime lenses and ideal f numbers.
August 13th, 2009 at 12:27 am
Hi there I have just got a while ago the Nikon 50mm f/1.8D AF Nikkor with a filter and lens hood just for £60 and it is brilliant. As a beginner photographer I find it very good to be restricted to one focal length. It forces you to think about your shots a lot more and as such brings down the amount of shots you take but bumps up their quality.
The sharpeness is brilliant, but i must say you can get amaizingly sharp shots with the standard VR kit lens you get with the Nikon D60. The control of dof gives very nice control over the final result and a the possibility for artistic flare.
Im a bit supriced about how everyone hypes how fantastic this is in low light. Yes it is very good in low light situations, but to be honest i find the standart 18-55 VR lens to be better. This might have to due with the fact with the Nikon D60 body you cannot auto-focus with the Nikon 50mm f/1.8D and thus making very hard to get the shot focused.
I gotta say this lens is a defenet buy for any one starting photography, with this lens ive learn so much more in short space than with the kit lens. All the limits bring out your own strengths! And it hasnt left my camera since I’ve got it.
heres one of the pictures ive took with it: http://www.flickr.com/photos/larrycabin/3814025441/
August 21st, 2009 at 7:21 pm
I only say: I’ve got the Canon 1.8 nifty fifty; the first series, MK I, from the ‘87.
Such a great lens.
The only little problem is that on my 20D became an 80 mm.
October 13th, 2009 at 1:14 am
i just a few days ago got the 50 mm F/1.8 II and I am having a blast with it! It is amazingly clear and really forces me to move around to compose outdoor shots. I’ll be doing more of that today with snow on the ground and Fall colors hanging on. So far I have mostly taken shots of my cats, indoor, but look forward to taking pics of my grandkids next weekend. The cats are great practice and I am amazed at the beauty in their eyes that is captured!
October 16th, 2009 at 9:38 pm
hello everyone..
i jz bought Nikon d90..
can i buy this prime lense Nikon 50mm f/1.8D AF Nikkor Lens for Nikon Digital SLR Cameras.
it is compatible with d90 body??
which is more great?
Nikon 50mm f/1.8D AF Nikkor Lens or AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G
October 21st, 2009 at 4:11 am
at acap. Go with the 35mm. I have a D90 and the pictures are great with it. the 50mm is to telle on the DX format cameras. Cant beat the $200 price. good luck finding it in stock…
Leave a Reply