The Secret Language of Photographs
by Declan O’Neill.
In my student days I was required to read a book called The Mirror and the Lamp by M. H. Abrams. At the time, it seemed rather a dull read about the Romantic tradition and literary criticism. The book argues that, before the Romantic movement, artists simply held a mirror up to nature. It was their job to reflect accurately what they saw. With the arrival of the Romantics, the artist was transformed into someone holding a lamp to illuminate the scene with their own passion and vision. For some reason I never managed to quite forget this book and its true significance emerged only years later as I began to question what I was doing as a photographer.
After many years of using my camera, I realised that most of the photographs I took were just reflections of the world presented to me. It was almost as if the photographs were taken at random – a pretty sunset here, a shimmering snow scape there. If I wanted to be more than a mirror, how could I use a lamp to illuminate my subject matter? Yet the idea that I should become some visionary with a camera did not appeal because I believe that images should stand alone without the presence of the photographer casting a shadow over them.
When I studied the work of the photographers I admired, one thing stood out. I thought at first it was a certain ambiguity: I would see one thing and my friend would see something else. Then I realised that what we were seeing was simply the power of metaphor. The image was composed so that there was room to shape it to our own meaning. It was neither a mirror nor a lamp. The picture was a cypher which allowed each viewer to decode it in their own way.
I doubt that any photographer deliberately sets out to create metaphors unless they are shooting material for image banks. You know the kind of stuff – a man in a business suit standing on the top of a mountain range clutching a laptop and looking into the sunset. Metaphors in our photographs are generally unintentional. When we talk about metaphors we are really saying that those images have a meaning for us beyond their subject matter. To help explain the role of metaphor in photography I need to talk about painting.
I first discovered painting in my twenties through the works of the Impressionist painters. I fell in love with the delicate softness of Renoir’s women and the complex colours in Monet’s landscapes.

I still like them but they don’t satisfy any more. When I was in my forties I went to an exhibition of Rembrandt’s self-portraits in the National Gallery in London. It was an experience that transformed my view of art forever.

The paintings charted Rembrandt’s changing view of himself. Beginning as a young well-dressed dandy in his twenties, the paintings moved through middle age to painfully honest studies of himself as an old man. His painting technique altered from slick and fashionable to rough, almost crude. His process altered deliberately as his subject matter coarsened with age. In a strange way his technique was a metaphor for the ageing process he was observing in himself.
It might seem a long way from this idea to the art of photography but, in reality, it is not. Many photographs I see on the web are beautiful in the way that Impressionist art is beautiful. Yet they leave me wanting more.
Every so often I will see work which is raw and visceral and which breaks all those sensible rules we are supposed to follow. It speaks of a total involvement with the subject but, more than that, it makes me ask questions. With Rembrandt I realised that I wasn’t just looking at a self-portrait. I was looking at a man coming to terms with his own mortality. More than that, it made me look at myself and examine my own journey from youth to age.
With some photographs we discern that the image has a concealed message. These images often trigger some internal reference and they will speak solely to us in a language we understand. Perhaps it is inaccurate to talk about the secret language of photography. It is not so much secret as intensely personal. As photographers, we control composition and technique but this is the just the beginning of what we do. Our best work often offers layers of meaning that we may never have imagined.
Declan O’Neill is a professional photographer living in the South Island of New Zealand.
site: www.newzealandlandscape.com





17 Responses to “The Secret Language of Photographs” - Add Yours
August 30th, 2012 at 9:06 am
A very interesting and well written point of view. Photography is personal, both in the taking and the viewing.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lendog64/5376443318/
August 30th, 2012 at 1:21 pm
Good post – so many times people phrase artwork as something the photographer, painter, poet, etc. wants to say. For those who (still) see all of the material in the world and all of the others who have already explored it, quite thoroughly (the sunset hitting the buildings in Tbilisi would seem specific enough, but you can bet there have been thousands of blog posts, photographs, and thrown-away poems better than anything I could write about that subject already), it’s good to see that the personal does matter.
I’ll probably never be convinced that what I hear the world saying is unique or matters enough to subject others to it but hopefully someone else isn’t quite that lost yet.
August 30th, 2012 at 1:33 pm
wow, loved this article
You gave a meaning to photography
I think this article will be the best in this year DPS
http://raghavendra-mobilephotography.blogspot.com/2012/06/old-and-beautiful-temple-in-vellore.html
August 30th, 2012 at 5:08 pm
A very nicely written article….it gave a very in dept knowledge of photography…loved it !!
August 30th, 2012 at 5:24 pm
I think what you say holds very true for photography – and it is almost as though the sharpness and detail of a photo betrays the ambiguity.
I am not sure I go along with your views on the Impressionists, though. Manet and Cezanne, for example, are full of questions.
August 30th, 2012 at 6:06 pm
It amazes me how manic professionals get about the rule of thirds and other so called rules. They are not rules but guides and should not restrict the emotion being conveyed by the image.
With this image I never thought at all about any rules. I woke up one morning in Italy saw this image and said to myself wow and then grabbed the camera and just said how can I convey that feeling and that image to a photo so that I can share it:
http://wildlifeencounters.photoshelter.com/gallery-image/Scenes-from-Italy-and-the-Alps/G0000ID.UepOSY4U/I0000T2OZwE2BgBg
August 30th, 2012 at 6:49 pm
Some pretty deep thinking. Much food for thought.
http://blogs.gonomad.com/traveltalesfromindia/
August 30th, 2012 at 11:15 pm
This is very poetic and mind opening. Thank you for starting my Thursday off so nicely.
August 30th, 2012 at 11:42 pm
Great article, definitely has be me thinking!
August 31st, 2012 at 3:00 am
Good article. Your wording differs from what I have used, but the general intent is virtually the same.
ART in all its forms “works” when it provides a handle/aspect/rhythm/pattern/form (cypher as a message in code is very good shorthand) that engages an individual. Once someone’s psyche is involved, the artist gets at least a “C” for accomplishing that step. The higher grades (for lack of a better description) then depend on the merit of the photo/song/story/etc.
August 31st, 2012 at 4:56 am
I really enjoyed your article and will keep it in my Favorites.
August 31st, 2012 at 7:11 am
An articulate and thoughtful article, Declan! You have caused me to revisit an idea I have been toying with: Shooting With Words. It is an idea that is in its infancy. Basically, I believe that we can dramatically improve our images by carefully defining the message we want to convey. Of course, this approach would require both rapid decisions and years of practice so that it can come closer to being intuitive.
Thank you for awakening the infant. It is squawking to be fed.
August 31st, 2012 at 8:03 am
I had just been speaking with my husband about this very idea only a couple of weeks ago. Great piece. You explained with great accuracy, an almost subtle, underlying current of art/artist/photographer. The examples you used to illustrate your thoughts and ideas were well-chosen and very poignant. This was wonderful!
August 31st, 2012 at 6:26 pm
I think this is often what separates the wannabes from those that actually are artists.
Having a vision, and being able to shine it all over your images is what makes photographers stand out from Gwacs/mwacs.
It’s akin to having a style that is distinctly yours. Something that makes your images stand out from the crowd.
Not saying I’m there, but I’ve seen for a while now that that’s what I need to work on.
Nice piece Darren
September 1st, 2012 at 7:28 am
My understanding of photography’s power of metaphor is not that there is space for one’s own interpretation but that there is a common understanding through the visual language that often isn’t there in spoken word because people speak different languages. Images do have meaning beyond their subject matter but that meaning is something that brings people together in their shared understanding and that is what gives particular photographs their power.
September 1st, 2012 at 10:41 am
Woa! wonderful post. It makes me realize that in fact, I was going with the flow without knowing it. I remember that the reason I started to like photography, where because of stories we can tell without talk…photography was the only way to capture the real meaning of my story.
http://toughsinphotography.blogspot.com
September 2nd, 2012 at 8:22 am
Sabrina, your comments are very interesting. I think there is a lot of useful discussion be had around the idea of Semiotics in photography. The Syntagmatic and Paradigmatic axes of interpretation in photogrhy would make a fascinating subject for an article but not, perhaps in a general interest forum. I am very interested in the intersection of photography and Semiotics. The only issue I have with your comment is that cultural context makes symbol different around the world. There are universals, I agree, but it would be fascinating to study the cultural differences in the interpretation of meaning in photography. Asian, Arabic, European and American contexts. Cultural norms have tremendous influence on interpretation. Much food for thought!
Leave a Reply