The Impact of Less
Less really can be more when it comes to photography. Find out how in this tutorial.
A Guest post by Nick Fleming.
Photography is about choices and decisions. Make the right ones up to the moment the shutter button is pressed and a successful composition will result. This sounds simple enough but we all know how frustratingly elusive this can be. The key to good photography is consistently choosing the right options and we achieve this not through following a magic formula, nor by having the best kit, but by practice.
However, the single piece of information that seems to resonate more than any other with my workshop attendees is that the way to impactful pictures is as much about what you decide to include as what you choose to omit. In my experience it is this last bit, the concept of excluding things to achieve a better picture, that has proved particularly helpful.
I have found, especially with those who are just beginning to feel their way in photography, that there is a tendancy to include too much in their scene. They can not decide what to leave out so they end up including everything. This has as much to do with a lack of confidence than as a desire not to miss anything but nonetheless it leads to a generally cluttered and uninteresting photo.
One way to avoid this is to learn to focus on what really matters in your scene, go for simplicity and be rigorous in deciding what needs to be there. Get to the heart of what you are trying to say: tell it simply and clearly. Concentrate on form, shape, gesture and expression. Less really can be more. The art of leaving out obvious detail is to invite the viewers to use their imagination and to fill in the gaps which have deliberately been left out. It will add a touch of mystery to your composition.

A potential Gurkha recruit to the British Army waits in line to take one of several physical tests. There is a lot at stake and he is understandably anxious.
His expression and posture says it all. We don’t need to see the figures behind him. The picture hints at their presence though.

Successful candidates are taken to the UK from Nepal for basic training. Here an instructor puts Gurkha recruits through a field fitness session.
We know what these young soldiers are doing without seeing the whole scene. Wet grass, creased boots and the stance of the instructor we can feel their pain!

A rural scene from India. The viewer instinctively knows what’s on the end of the plough; by leaving it out I was able to get closer to the scene. For me, the woman dressed in a colourful sari sowing the seeds is central to the picture.
Monks return across flooded fields to their monastery with grass for their cows. Again all the information is in the picture. The viewer knows the figure in the foreground is in a wooden boat very similar to the one in the mid-ground. It is his shape and the light from the setting sun which completes the scene.

This simple picture is about shapes and figures. We don’t need to know what the man pulling in the net looks like. We fill in the gaps with our imagination.
See more of Nick Fleming’s work at his site – nickfleming.com




22 Responses to “The Impact of Less” - Add Yours
February 23rd, 2012 at 6:18 am
Excellent shots in this post. I love rocking the minimal.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/22176685@N07/6899357113/in/photostream
February 23rd, 2012 at 6:40 am
Lovely! The foggy boat shot is very well-composed.
February 23rd, 2012 at 6:41 am
Less means the eye can focus on what is important in a scene:
http://wildlifeencounters.photoshelter.com/gallery-image/European-Insects-Spiders-and-molluscs/G0000KgqECgOq3Tw/I0000ugJhUSfANzY
February 23rd, 2012 at 7:26 am
“impactful” isn’t a word
February 23rd, 2012 at 7:50 am
The first examples are great at showcasing hints of emotion which doesn’t need the surrounding context to feel it.
February 23rd, 2012 at 8:40 am
@allison: time to update your dictionary: https://www.google.com/search?q=impactful
February 23rd, 2012 at 8:53 am
This is great advice. It is easy to try to cram too much into a frame, but as shown, the impact can be greater without the “extra”. Of course, it can work both ways, can’t it?
Here’s a couple of shots of some lace makers. Including the women in the image would not have added to the images:
http://jeffejensen.blogspot.com/2011/09/lace-makers.html
February 23rd, 2012 at 10:38 am
Think like a photographer in the mid 1800′s and minimal is all you had.
February 23rd, 2012 at 10:56 am
Definitely agree, a great article.
This photo has something in common with title photo of this article.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lendog64/5710070511/
February 23rd, 2012 at 11:44 am
Simplicity is not simple…Simple is not simplicity..
February 23rd, 2012 at 1:44 pm
I have made a story. It is simple yet powerful
http://raghavendra-mobilephotography.blogspot.com/p/cat-story.html
February 23rd, 2012 at 3:20 pm
Simple lines and simple colors make the most effective portraits, good point on the need for restricting the shot to the barest details to get the most poignant results.
February 23rd, 2012 at 3:49 pm
I wish I would try this out more. Here is one which fits the bill in terms of being uncluttered.
http://blogs.gonomad.com/traveltalesfromindia/2011/12/skywatch-friday-soap-bubble-and-the-sun.html
February 23rd, 2012 at 10:41 pm
“less is more” said Mies van der Rohe, architect. true on so many levels…
February 24th, 2012 at 1:45 am
Impactful is a word: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/impactful
February 25th, 2012 at 12:54 am
Absolutely agree. non-typical headshots can really add to a photoshoot.
Flickr:
http://bit.ly/oufr4c
February 25th, 2012 at 3:14 am
Wonderful article with perfect examples to drive the point home. Well done.
February 25th, 2012 at 4:14 am
Great article! Thanks so much! I’m so new with my DSLR and articles like these are so very helpful!
@Allison Tsk tsk. Didn’t your mother teach you that if you don’t have anything nice to say, don’t say anything at all? Especially when you’re WRONG. Sheesh. A great article was written and given to you FOR FREE of charge and all you could focus on was a possible incorrect word?
February 25th, 2012 at 10:49 am
Thank you great article made me think a bit more about how i take my shots.
March 2nd, 2012 at 4:33 am
Although I appreciate the “less is more” concept regarding travel and editorial photo categories, such as the examples, I wish there would have been nature and landscape examples. I’m just experimenting with “less is more” regarding nature and I’m having a hard time finding examples that find a happy medium between expansive landscapes and nature studies. If someone could write an article or send reference links, I’d greatly appreciate it.
March 2nd, 2012 at 4:34 am
For a new photographer like me, this article really stands out and it’s theme is the reason I find so many great “professional” photos appeal to me…the subject is clear, nothing distracts my attention away from it. Recently, I (Rambler) responded to the following series of photos trying to point out these very things to the photographer.
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/forum/index.php?topic=63131.0
March 2nd, 2012 at 7:07 am
I am struggling with DSLR photography, at 68, in my own sincere sort of way. If only I could be reminded daily about the articles messgage! But I know that simplicity is achieved after some pain – painfully simple!
Leave a Reply