How to Shoot Super Macro Photos

In this post, professional photographer Yanik Chauvin from Yanik’s Photo School shows us how to take stunning super macro photos.
I’m a big fan of macro photography. So much so that when I chose my first ever digital camera, the Nikon Coolpix 4500, it was mostly base on its macro capabilities. And when I purchased my Nikon D70 with kit lens, the next lens in my bag was the Sigma 105mm macro.
After shooting lots of macros, I wanted to push the envelope and see if there was a way to get even closer to my subject (without the need for a microscope). Looking on the net, I found a photographer who did just that! Boy was I a happy camper. I have since been using this technique called “Super Macro” to take some pretty amazing photography.
Ok, before I get into the “how to”, let me first give you a brief explanation of what macro is. It’s basically close-up photography where the image projected on the camera sensor is relatively the same size as your subject. We give this term a ratio of 1:1. Most standard macro lenses give you up to 1:1 ratio. As for super macro, depending on your lens combination, you can usually get a ratio of 2:1 or greater. What this means is that your sensor sees closer than the human eye which leads to some unusual photography.
Equipment
Alright! Let’s look at what we need to achieve super macro photos.
- A macro lens (ideally a prime lens)
- A fast lens (ideally a prime lens with f1.8 or f1.4)
- A step-down ring
- A portable flash
- A tripod

The reasons why I suggest prime lenses is that they’re the sharpest lenses and when you’re staking that much glass in front of your sensor, things then to go soft very fast. The step-down ring should match your lenses’ respective diameters.
There are other ways to setup for super macros, some using extension tubes or teleconverters, but I wanted to keep it simple.
Setup
Now, let’s make it work.
Step 1: Put the macro lens on the camera (in my case it’s the Sigma 105mm)
Step2 : Make sure your lens is on manual focus
Step 3 : Screw the step-down ring onto the macro lens
Step 4 : Turn the aperture dial on your fast lens (in my case it’s the Nikkor 50mm) to it’s widest setting (smallest f-stop #). We need as much light as possible getting in.
Step 5 : Screw the front of the fast lens onto the front of the macro lens.
Step 6 : Put your camera on manual focus
This is what the setup should look like.

The reason I added the tripod and the flash in the equipment list is that, since there isn’t a lot of light making it to the sensor, you’ll either need a long shutter speed or more light.
You’ll notice that your depth of field (DOF) is extremely small (roughly 1 or 2mm) so things get blurry very fast. Make sure your subject isn’t moving or else you’ll be out of focus. If you insist on doing this hand held, exhale before you press the trigger… you might get lucky. ;-)
Being so close and having such a small DOF is a great combination for fun abstract photography. Use you imagination and have fun!
As for the flash, you’ll have to trigger it off camera because of the length of the combined lenses and the proximity of the subject to the lenses.
Here are some samples images as examples.

Morning frost on my canoe.

Orange Hawkweed

Daisy

Wolf Spider (if you look close enough, you’ll see my lens in its eyes!)
Try Yanik’s technique and then share your Super Macro Images in the Share Your Shots section of our forum.
55 Responses to “How to Shoot Super Macro Photos” - Add Yours
November 7th, 2008 at 12:11 am
Just so there is no confusion, isn’t the correct name for the ring a “reversing ring”? A step down ring is for filters.
A set of Auto Tubes works great as well and you can use a variety of lenses with them. From Primes to zooms.
Pete
http://www.petelanglois.net/macro
November 7th, 2008 at 12:23 am
In german it is “Kupplungsring”, so probably “coupling ring” is better. Step down doesn’t work, you can’t screw in another lens.
I did a little tutorial on this a couple of month ago: Extreme Makroaufnahmen mit dem Kupplungsring, if somebody wants a german version.
November 7th, 2008 at 1:04 am
great article… my brother uses a Canon MP-E 65 and has taken some awesome macro shots with it:
http://www.mattbl.com/2007/08/mosquito-emerging-2/
http://www.mattbl.com/2006/08/common-blue-butterfly/
http://www.mattbl.com/2007/12/leaf-cutter-ant/
November 7th, 2008 at 1:46 am
I thought it was an adapter ring like used for filters.
I don’t have a macro lens, but use macro filters on my prime lenses. Has anyone tried this technique using those? I may give it a try and see. Those are amazing shots!
November 7th, 2008 at 2:02 am
Hi Pete
You might be right here. I’ve always called them step-up/down rings since I have a variety for my filters.
I also saw the term “reverse ring”. On Ebay they sometimes call them step-up/down rings.
November 7th, 2008 at 2:22 am
I have a canon compact-macro lens EF 50mm, and a Tamron 17-50mm wide angle lens. Could I combine these two to do super macro photography? And if so, which one would I attach to the camera first? I would also need to find a Reverse ring, or step-up/down ring. So depending on which one I would attach to the camera first, it would be a different ring.
Thanks
November 7th, 2008 at 2:31 am
I really love the shots you done here and all the info…
I was wondering if you can help me as I am basically a rookie when it comes to photography… I have a Canon Rebel XSi and I have a 75-300mm lens but want a Macro lens… I have NO idea as to what I need to buy as an extra… do I need to buy any extras? What is a good lens? Can I put anything other then a Canon lens on there? I know this isn’t the right place to put this but would really love to learn how to take photos like this…
November 7th, 2008 at 2:40 am
I don’t want to make your article look bad but i think there is a cheaper and better way.
Now I started with two lenses on top of each other at first too.
Then i discovered the retro macro method.
All you need is a kit lens and a retro adapter which is like 20 dollars or euros or whatever currency ;D
The lens has to be something like 18 to 55 or 70 mm.
Important thing is the wide angle end of the lens, the smaller the wideangle focal length, the higher the image ratio gets.
Don’t worry about much about quality of kit lenses.
I know they don’t live up to better lenses IN NORMAL USAGE.
But retro macro only uses the very center of the lens, which is usually the best spot. If you really want high image quality, go to dpreview.com and check out the lens tests, where they have an interactive tool where you can check out different focal lengths and f/stops.
Now, flash is really a must for this type of photography as
Yanik said. Basically all you need is well described in his article.
The only reason I think the retro method wins out over the reversing mehtod ist that you dont have so much expensive glass and weight in front of your body.
Also the image ratio is way more macro.
I can get down to like 4:1 which is really astonishing to see.
If you want to see examples, check out my flickr account http://www.flickr.com/photos/w4yne/ and go to retro files album
Greetz Jim
PS: I’ll also share some in the forum
November 7th, 2008 at 3:05 am
One word: Diopters.
People surprisingly don’t use them as much anymore even when they are comparatively cheap and allow you to physically move your camera closer and focus. I’d like to see a shot with this “super macro” and a diopter placed between the lenses.
November 7th, 2008 at 3:25 am
Thanks for explaining this technique. I have been using my macro but had not thought of adding another lens to make it super.
Comment by seattle wedding photographer Daniel Sheehan who’s Seattle wedding photography uses a story-telling approach ranking himone of the best Seattle wedding photographers.
November 7th, 2008 at 3:29 am
Great photographs to present the topic. I have a question. For good macro lens, do I need to have DSLR?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ignoto_someoneski/2873477524/
November 7th, 2008 at 3:33 am
WOW. That’s some pretty impressive shooting. I’ve never seen such a close up of a spiders face. Interesting technique. The closest I’ve come to macro is an extension tube, but I’ll have to delve in deeper one of these days.
Gavin
November 7th, 2008 at 3:37 am
Well I guess if you don’t buy em from good quality producers, they make the image quality suck and if you DO buy em from those producers, its not cheap any more ;)
Another thing:
Filter accessories are 3 different types.
- Stepup and Stepdown rings which are used to use like a a 55 mm filter on a lens with 49 mm filter thread diameter (that’s a stepdown ring then)
- reversing ring is a piece of metal that has threads on both sides to screw together two lenses like in the article above
- retro adapters have the bayonett mount on one side and on the other a filter thread to screw a lens onto the body facing the camera with the front element ( which in my opinion is the better method for super macro shots)
Greetz Jim
November 7th, 2008 at 3:58 am
Good article!
AFAIK, step-up and step-down rings are male-female adapters used between a lens and a filter of different sizes; what you have used is a male-male adapter, also called a reverse ring.
November 7th, 2008 at 4:38 am
It is a step down ring in fact that you need to go from a 58mm to 52mm thread in this case.A reversing ring would allow you to put the 5omm lens say backwards onto the body on its own but in this case you are effectively linking the lenses through a step down ring surely as Image- Y suggests. Got the same lenses as me here so as soon as I get my step down ring I`ll have a go as I have problems with the cheap extension tubes I got off ebay.
November 7th, 2008 at 5:13 am
Andrew: I have a set of diopters, not the cheapest, but not the most expensive either. The problem I’ve run into is they give a pretty soft focus, particularly if you stack them for really close up work. Maybe it’s my technique that I haven’t perfected, but I’ve seen much sharper images from this reversed lens technique. I suspect it’s because the quality of glass in a prime lens is probably better than the diopter’s.
November 7th, 2008 at 5:30 am
Great article. Thanks for sending it. I used to stack lenses and use diopters with my Olympus 35mm OM-1n and now have a D-70 DSLR with the 18-70 mm Zoom lens. Would it work to put a 105mm Macro lens on the front of my zoom lens and do some macro work? I really miss doing macro shots, but haven’t invested in a second lens yet. Is the 105 mm Sigma lens you purchased a good one (even without stacking the lenses)? Keep up the really interesting articles. They are appreciated.
Chris
November 7th, 2008 at 5:33 am
Just a quick update… my D70 DSLR is a Nikon. Best investment I’ve made in a long time. The quality shots are with the Manual setting though. Haven’t been able to get the same quality with the automatic settings. Can’t wait to try Macro again. :-)
Chris
November 7th, 2008 at 8:08 am
great tips, cant wait to try it. although i do have one question. i dont quite understand on where to position the flash.
do i have to attach it to the hot shoe on my dslr or is it better to have it as a slave?
thanks in advance
November 7th, 2008 at 8:09 am
thanks for that how to, great stuff. I use the nikon 105mm macro and also attach a closeup filter when needed, but I do have the nikon pk-12 and pk-13 extension tubes which I haven’t used to much, but should try out. Cool stuff, I love macro, wish I did more of that type of photography.
p.s. – if anyone is really really serious about doing great macro, nikon makes the 200mm f/4 which is (for macro) as good as it gets (IMO).
November 7th, 2008 at 9:28 am
Great article, but did anybody else read it as “How to Shoot Super Mario Bros.”?
November 7th, 2008 at 10:31 am
I love this technique, but moreso that you were able to document the setup so well and each step. It allows the person who has never done this before to know little things. You explained it so well and made the procedure so simple.
Great job.
November 7th, 2008 at 10:57 am
It seems that many people reading this article may not be ready to spend 500 dollars or more on a macro lens. Although the following method won’t get you into *super* macro photography, it will get you to 1:1 or close to it for a fraction of the cost of a true macro lens…
Materials…
Nikon 50mm f1.8 ~ $100
Nikon BR-2A Lens Reversing Ring ~ $30
52mm +4 close up diopter – $25
Method…
Attach diopter to lens threads, then reversal ring to diopter threads, attach other side of reversal ring to camera body, congrats: now your camera looks weirder
Pros…
Start taking sweet macro photos for $55 dollars (if you already have the 50mm prime.)
Cons…
Everything has to be done manually: focusing, manual exposure. You can’t meter through this setup.
Even with your lens stopped down to f16 or f22 the depth of field will be insanely shallow. You will find that its easier to move your subject than your camera. You will want a tripod, and a flash. This isn’t a replacement for a $700 macro lens, but its a great alternative for someone on a budget that would like to try their hand at macro photography and see if its something they enjoy.
Notes…
You can stack more than one close up diopter but image quality will get much softer. Unless you’re outside on a sunny day, your viewfinder will be frustratingly dark at f22 and you will probably want to break things.
November 7th, 2008 at 2:22 pm
Awesome photos! Thanks to all for sharing them along with your techniques. Here is yet another approach that yields great depth of field — Bob Frank’s http://www.bugmacros.com/
Max
November 7th, 2008 at 6:44 pm
Well done. Thats a very detailed description on the technique and some wonderful results you got (I really love the first photo of the morning frost!).
I’ve successfully used this technique in the past and documented it on this photo of the final setup:
http://flickr.com/photos/markop/500013141/
Photos I’ve shot this way:
http://flickr.com/search/?q=58mmto52mmreverselenscoupler&w=91116392@N00&m=tags&s=int
November 7th, 2008 at 11:48 pm
Beautiful shots! Makes me wish I had a nice camera.
Also, as an invertebrate enthusiast, I can tell you that the spider is most likely a jumping spider – they tend to have the to “big” eyes in front like that. Great shot! I am jealous – we have a tarantula and I really struggle trying to get good shots of her.
November 8th, 2008 at 12:08 am
As mentioned by Eduardo Perez & W4yne, however you want to call the ring, what’s important is that you have a MALE-MALE tread. :)
November 8th, 2008 at 12:36 am
I love your pictures and thank you for the tutorial. I can’t believe you got that close to a wolf spider, that’s just frickin’ nutz. Yikes, great shot though and it looks like it was worth it. Thanks for sharing.
November 8th, 2008 at 12:43 am
Correct me if I’m wrong, but shouldn’t you use LESS apperture due to the very narrow DOF that inversing lenses give?
November 8th, 2008 at 1:14 am
Hi Pete,
I’m new to macrophotography, I liked it with my first photshoot of a bee. Your article is a great reference mand guide to newcomers of macrophotgraphy!
November 8th, 2008 at 1:23 am
Hello thank you for the tips
That you design you give me to improve the photos macro taken with my Coolpix P80…
Fernando
November 8th, 2008 at 1:36 am
Darren,
Very good primer on Macro photography. I myself need to get a step down ring
to try this myself.
November 8th, 2008 at 4:13 am
wow, very interesting! and thank you for the inspiration :) Just bought a ring off ebay so I can try this!! sooo excited!
November 8th, 2008 at 6:57 am
I think that shot of the spider is amazing but my favourite has to be the daisy…
November 8th, 2008 at 4:11 pm
Incredible…..is all I can say! These pics are just incredible…can’t wait to upgrade to all these goodies to try this out!! :)
November 8th, 2008 at 6:36 pm
A few days ago I bought 3 rings converters to put between my camera and the lens. It’s the most efficient (results/price) investment I’ve done lately. The results are amazing (for me)
November 9th, 2008 at 9:40 am
Macro needs a lot of light to get an image to the sensor/film. A technique for setting a correct ( or a very close) exposure first up is a small piece of maths used by large format photographers for years. It is a way of calculating the exposure based on the bellows extension of the camera or in this case where most of you are using SLR/DSLR or Medium Format cameras barrel extension.
1. Take you exposure reading and establish what F stop you are getting.
2. What is the total focal lengths of you combined lenses at infinity.
3. What is the total focal length once you have focused on you subject. This will be significantly longer than focal length in No.2.
The maths goes something like this;
Multiply the F No. by the Focal length of the lens(s) being used then divide them by the total length of the bellows (barrel) extension.
F No. x Focal Length
divided by
Total Bellows (Barrel) Extension.
This calculation will give you the exposure correction you need to make an accurate exposure.
or for the digital world keep burning more light in until it looks good on the sensor.
Yeah I know this is how most of us work these days.
The extension calculation is still useful because you can pre-calculate the exposure factor correction(s) you will need at various extensions before you set up. This will allow you to work out what lighting gear will be needed to get that pic.
Happy hunting.
Jeff
November 9th, 2008 at 9:52 am
How did you get the spider to sit still for the photo?
November 11th, 2008 at 2:47 am
i also love macro..your tips are very useful to me…i am using nikon d 70s with 18-70mm kit lens and nikon 55mm macro lens.perhaps you can see my photos in my flickr. here is my website http://flickr.com/photos/luqman_3g/
November 11th, 2008 at 12:25 pm
I found this article very helpful! I started playing with the Super Macro setup, my 18-135 and 50mm lens and works well! I don’t have the reduction ring or any other ring, so I just held the 50mm lend up to the 18-135mm lens set at about 58mm and this is what I got:
http://www.photographypad.com/Site/My_Albums/Pages/Super_Macro.html#0
November 11th, 2008 at 5:33 pm
aha… nice tips… i also have super macro, but i called it “Extreme Macro”, i use pocket camera and reversed lens…
Here is my extreme macro http://teddywidhi.multiply.com/photos/album/1/Macro_Photography_using_Digicam_Pocket_Reversed_Lens
and
http://teddywidhi.multiply.com/photos/album/2/Makro_Flora
November 12th, 2008 at 9:33 am
your tips are very useful to me…i am using nikon d 70s with 18-70mm kit lens and nikon 55mm macro lens.perhaps you can see my photos in my flickr. I also haue site on digital photgraphy. here is my website where to learn alot about your digital photography, http://www.digitalphotographyportals.blogspot.com
November 25th, 2008 at 5:12 pm
Okay, so I bought the reversing ring, did the exact setup as above, I have a Canon Xti, 100mm F2.8 Macro lens and a 50mm F1.8 lens. I put everything to manual focus, but for the life of me, I cannot get any focus, I only get a whole bunch of blur! Any suggestions?
November 26th, 2008 at 1:30 pm
@AutumnBerry : You should use manual focus with forward and backward, and Far the subject and with your outer lens its about 2-4cm or about 1 inch.
:( sorry my bad english….
February 9th, 2009 at 11:56 am
Hi
What would be the best wide aperture lens for my Canon EOS40D, what is the price.. approximately , I’m using Sigma 17-70MM Macro.
Thanks
March 25th, 2009 at 5:13 pm
I guess the pros do not really need any tricks or tips, as their levels are up on top. I guess those amateurs like me who are most in need of tips or tricks. Unfortunately, most of the articles in this websites are for the Pros with their sophisticated digital cameras. For us who are just ordinary and amateur photographers with point and shoot digital camera, to achieve such as yours perhaps only a dream. I just have canon S5IS, and I can shoot a macro good enough for my level of photography, anyway. I wish there are more articles for the ordinary and amateur photographers. God bless!
March 27th, 2009 at 9:08 am
i’m not sure about this one. is it still called step down ring? i think it needs male rings in both ends. isn’t it? please answer me back on this.
April 22nd, 2009 at 9:12 am
i did a graphics card with this tecnique check it out!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/22561181@N07/3463317157/
May 1st, 2009 at 12:30 pm
Thats an interesting experiment. But I have one doubt here.
I am having an Olympus Zuiko Digital 14-42mm kit lens for a wide angle. There is not aperture dial in lens itself, as you have mentioned in your Nikkor 50mm. How to set it for Aperture in that case?
May 16th, 2009 at 7:15 am
@ramasubramaniyan
May 25th, 2009 at 10:51 am
I am a beginner. But very interested about macro and especially super macro.
So
I have a question: the distal lens is reversed. So iti is exposed to elements (dust, etc.). Do you have any sduggestions, ex. something to cover this area. (I saw this comment elsewhere but with NO answer)?
Thanks
Louis from NB, Canada
June 9th, 2009 at 10:39 am
I am a Macro enthusiast and have recently been using 105mm lens.. some of my shots are ok but I still want to learn how to make it better. Any suggestion what would make a clear and better macro using that lens? What kind of accessories do I need to use? Check out my macro shots on my Flickr page.
June 9th, 2009 at 10:43 am
I am a Macro enthusiast and have recently been using 105mm lens.. some of my shots are ok but I still want to learn how to make it better. Any suggestion what would make a clear and better macro using that lens? What kind of accessories do I need to use? Check out my macro shots on my Flickr page.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellie_pryadh/
July 23rd, 2009 at 10:18 am
Hi! What a fantastic photos you’ve got there! I’ve got a sony alpha200. Do you think it’s possible to shoot a macro with this kind of camera? What sort of lens do you think i need with these kind of camera? Thanks alot!
kind regards,
marloncm
July 24th, 2009 at 4:38 pm
i love doing macro and since i cant afford a nice macro lens for my canon so i have found a poor stupid mans macro lens… i take my 1.8 50mm and turn it around and hold the lens to the body and shoot. its not good for the sensor but i dont shoot a lot of macro this way i use my canon S5 with its built in super-macro setting witch is wicked good
Leave a Reply