Small Lighting for Big Results
A Guest post by Luke Townsend.
We’ve all heard it, the question that has haunted mans inner paranoia for centuries, the question that photographers ponder everyday, shoot to shoot…does size matter? I’m talking about lighting size and needs. Many factors go into play when trying to choose a light source for your shoot and knowing which one to use and when to use it will prove to be advantageous when clients start searching for skilled photographers. For many photographers the thought of using anything other than their tride and true studio lights is out of the question but knowing how to properly utilize small light, how to shape and augment them in anyway possible to fit your scene can present major lighting advantages for future work.
As you start to explore and experiment with all the options presented to you, finding the right light becomes less of a chore and thanks to the many technological leaps in industry integrating both systems into your jobs becomes a smooth and seamless transition.
Location or studio? Are you traveling? Does the airline have weight restrictions? Portraits or products? Do you need a modeling light? Do you need battery longevity? What modifiers will you need? What’s your budget? What’s the final output? What’s the mood you want to convey? Taking that first step is always tough however, making a point to get in the habit of asking these simple questions days before the shoot will not only save you time but lots of headache when you’re faced with the pressures of the job at hand.

Take a look at these two images for example. The job was to photograph two headshots of Bashira to use for her own promotional purposes. I had about ten minutes with Bashira to make the portraits so the first step is to keep it simple. Simple is always your best friend, especially when you don’t have the luxury of a couple hundred assistants. Time is limited so I don’t need long lasting batteries however recycle time is key. If you’re thinking studio light you’re correct. I hauled out the Profoto 7B for this shoot. The 7B is a small 1200 watt second battery operated field unit that recycles fast and can last you all day in the field if necessary. To capture Bashira’s face appropriately I chose the beauty dish as my main light.
The beauty of the beauty dish, no pun intended, is that the light is soft but inherently sharp and contrasty, another prime reason for selecting the larger Profoto studio lights. Put at least 10 feet between the white background and Bashira and the white slips into a beautiful dark grey. Question is how to separate her hair from blending into the dark background? This is where the slave and zoom functions of the Sb-900 units comes into play. You can see below in the diagram that I set up two Sb-900 units on either side of Bashira to light the hair. Keep in mind your main light has sharp and contrasty values so it’s important to mimic that feel with your separation lights. One great feature of the Sb units is the ability to zoom the light down to 200mm, essentially collecting the light into a tight beam and throwing it a far distance, giving me the same “hard” look from the light.
The fun starts when you ask yourself how do I fire all of the lights? One could easily set up a pocket wizard on each light but keeping costs down and the amount of gear you have to travel with will keep you happy and the client happy when they get the bill. I threw the two back lights into TTL because I knew the Nikon system is extremely accurate in calculating exposure for any given scene. Slip another Sb-900 on the camera’s hot shoe which essentially becomes your pocket wizard, using the commander unit to trigger the backlights which in turn triggered the Profoto 7B set on slave. Super easy, super fast integration of big and small flash.

Okay, so the system works in the comfort of a controlled studio but can it produce the same results outside on location where anything can happen? Next scenario was to photograph Nik as if he was a crane operator in the Brooklyn Naval Yards. Days before the shoot I scouted the location and the shadow of a giant crane hook on the side of a building caught my eye. Always be on the lookout for simple, creative ways to enhance a portrait. Shadows are your friend.
I remember a quote I heard from George Hurrell years back that said it’s not where you place the light, it’s where you place the shadows that count. This frame of mind has stuck with me and one thing that’s good to try is just to put a light up behind some objects and just let the shadows fall where they fall. Put anything in front of the light, pallets, plants, bars, and just play. It’s a quick and easy way to create dramatic backgrounds with nothing more than one light. Using the effects of the shadow play It’s easy to augment the natural effects of the sunlight shadow into a controlled working studio but adding strobe.
The challenge here was to get the light in the right position. The sun is up high, shining down at an angle at which my light stands do reach. Here’s where the portability of the Sb-900 comes into play. I had my assistant climb onto the roof with the strobe in order to mimic the sunlight. Using the zoom function again is important because you want a hard, sharp shadow. If you think about why the sun always produces sharp shadows think about where the sun is in relation to your subject. It’s really far away. Even the largest softbox 20 feet away is going to produce sharp, harsh shadows.
One more step is involved to achieve the look and feel of the late afternoon sunlight…warmth. I added a full cut of CTO, color temperature orange, correction gel to significantly warm up the scene. I started out photographing Nik close to the wall where he would be light entirely with the strobe up on the roof. Pretty nice look, open, and shot loose to help give a since of scale between Nik and the size of the hook.

As I did in the studio with Bashira I pulled Nik far away from the background for a tighter portrait. To create a different look I zoomed my lens down to 200mm to compress the background for a more clean and simple image. I have now brought Nik out of the light and silhouetted him. This is where the portability of the Profoto 7b comes in handy. Since the unit is battery powered I can forget about having to haul around hundreds of feet of extension cords and generators and worrying about finding an AC plug in. Now I can focus on my subject and the task at hand.
Again I used the beauty dish because while I wanted the feel of sunlight I needed a light that is still soft and flattering for a portrait and I implemented the same triggering technique as in the studio to fire all of the units, using the strobe on the roof to trigger the Profoto unit on the ground via the slave function.



The key here is to figure out what works for you. Ask yourself the questions necessary to appropriately light your subjects and experiment, experiment, experiment! Whether big or small each unit has its place and when you can seamlessly integrate both into your daily lighting workflow you will see yourself becoming more efficient and more prepared. Each new scenario will allow you to catalog those solutions into your mental rolodex which will allow you to become a better photographer with better solutions which will take your work to a whole new level!
See more of Luke’s work at his website or Facebook page.




35 Responses to “Small Lighting for Big Results” - Add Yours
April 21st, 2011 at 6:15 am
Hi
This is a really great article about the sometimes difficult choices one has to make when choosing how to light a subject. I have had great success using Nikon SB600 flashes, with various light modifiers, for outdoor situations, or when I need some portability. One Master can control a group of Slaves, and all TTL info is used making for excellent exposure control.
I also like to use AC Strobes when I can. Specifically I like Alien Bee units. they are small, powerful, robust and come a a reasonable price. These shows were with a single strobe and large Softbox with a grate, controlled with a wireless trigger.
Red or Black II: http://t.co/8KrlvK5
April 21st, 2011 at 7:04 am
The first set-up (1 7B, 3 SB-900s) would cost some $5,500 alone. Too rich for my “starving artist” wallet.
Perhaps DPS should start putting little dollar sign ratings on their daily articles, much like restaurants are rated in terms of price (i.e., $=inexpensive; $$=moderately priced; $$$=expensive).
This is definitely a $$$ set-up.
April 21st, 2011 at 7:40 am
That $$ rating system idea is GREAT!!! I would pass right on some of the articles if I knew how much it costs to follow the suggestions. That way I could budget my reading time based on what is practical for me! Thanks Nikki
April 21st, 2011 at 8:18 am
You know what I found was easier to show my lighting setup when I was trying to explain it to someone? I would take a wide angle picture of it from a distance so people could actually see my lights and exactly how they were setup. It sure beats stick figure drawings on legal pads.
April 21st, 2011 at 8:33 am
i think the rating idea is good too, however, the focus of the article really boils down to the first paragraph. if you know you only have a limited budget for lighting, you have to be asking yourself questions that result in the usage of that lighting equipment (until you make some money to purchase other equipment). you don’t want to put yourself in the position of having a great idea and then get lack-luster results.
great write up, Luke.
April 21st, 2011 at 10:21 am
Great info.!!!!
April 21st, 2011 at 10:22 am
It doesn’t have to be that expensive…You could use three $100 manual flashes, and cheaper or DIY modifiers. You’ll lose some power and flexibility, but it wouldn’t prevent you from getting similar results. The strobist website has a lot of great info on using just a few small flashes for great lighting.
April 21st, 2011 at 2:47 pm
yeah you could easily use cheaper setups, yongnuo make great speedlites and are really cheap, 4 of them would be under $500
and would give you similar results
April 21st, 2011 at 4:12 pm
Thank you guys for the Love!
Nikki….don’t look too much into the cost of the equipment in regards to what I used for the post.
You can easily, and affordably use the lights that you have or any brand (alien bees, profoto, elinchrom, broncolor, white lightning, photogenic, nikon, canon, etc) and create the same look. I used what I had in the studio…but that doesn’t mean that’s the only choice!
The Key is to understand how big studio light and small hot shoe strobes can interact seamlessly together!
April 21st, 2011 at 4:33 pm
Nicely done Luke!
Really happy to see you heading one step at a time – in the right direction
Best
Rahul
April 22nd, 2011 at 2:20 am
Although it’s a nice attempt to make lighting seem easy, I think in your images itself it shows – the art of balancing light is yet another thing that amateurs need to keep in mind. Take for eg the portrait of the person against the silhouetted hook – the background is of sunlight wavelength, while his face is illuminated by Flash wavelength – loss of WB match! Remember to use Gels in such scenarios, or better still, try to stick to one source of light only – and play around by reflecting it…
April 22nd, 2011 at 3:09 am
Great article Luke. Thank you. I also agree a grading system would be helpful. However there are more than one way to skin a cat. There are modifiers made for use with off camera flash units that can be substituted for studio flash heads, which could bring down costs for those starting out. See this website for more. http://jchphotography.wordpress.com/2009/01/14/new-beauty-dish-adapter-for-sb-800-speedlight/
April 22nd, 2011 at 3:32 am
Yeah, not many of us have an extra $5,000 to shell out for lighting. I looked up the Profoto 7B to find the cost, but if, as Nikki suggested, there were a $ rating system for this article, I could have spared myself the time of reading it.
April 22nd, 2011 at 3:54 am
The dollar sign rating would be brilliant.
I, too, wish I hadn’t invested time reading this today–but i might want to read it later down the line when im in the market for studio ligts.hEhen I saw “small light” in the title I was thinking it’d help me with my two speedlights.
April 22nd, 2011 at 4:23 am
I think in this article you are talking about too much sweet things than the real subject . why cant you explain tot he subject and then come to sweet. thank you.
April 22nd, 2011 at 4:53 am
I too agree with the other comments. This was an interesting article even though it was a little misnamed. I started to read it thinking it was about “small lighting” only to find out the first lighting situation used $5,000.00 worth of equipment. At that point I pretty much stopped reading. The $$$ rating system sounds like a great idea for future articles.
April 22nd, 2011 at 5:42 am
I have to agree, great artical for people with big money, title is really misleading, I thought it was an artical for small lighting as well
April 22nd, 2011 at 6:03 am
I feel the same as many of the comments above: good article, I especially liked the hand drawn lighting setup diagrams, but with a title of “Small Lighting” I was expecting to see a one-strobe setup, maybe two with small if any light modifiers, not setups as complicated and expensive as that.
If anyone is interested in what you can do for minimal $ I describe my two strobe (SB-800, SB-600, Yongnuo triggers) setup technique here:
http://jasoncollinphotography.com/blog/2011/1/12/photography-tip-two-strobe-off-camera-flash-setup.html
This two strobe setup I can handle myself fairly easily allowing to shoot at multiple spots on location, for example in the above post on a beach. I do not use softboxes because of the wind. I would need two assistants to hold down the strobes, so I make due with just diffuser caps on the strobes.
April 22nd, 2011 at 6:27 am
Hey Guys….don’t look too much into the cost of the equipment in regards to what I used for the post.
You can easily, and affordably use the lights that you have or any brand (alien bees, profoto, elinchrom, broncolor, white lightning, photogenic, nikon, canon, etc) and create the same look. Most of these systems all have batter operated units and the same modifiers all at varying cost. I used what I had in the studio…but that doesn’t mean that’s the only choice!
The Key is to understand how big studio light and small hot shoe strobes can interact seamlessly together!
April 22nd, 2011 at 6:32 am
Don’t forget people, you could rent all this for pretty cheap too! Especially if it’s something a client needs. Better to know than not.
April 22nd, 2011 at 6:47 am
Great quote, “The job was to photograph two headshots of Bashira to use for her own promotional purposes. I hauled out the Profoto 7B for this shoot.” Keep it simple: Pull out the big lights! ARE YOU KIDDING? You just made it sound like you must use expensive studio lights to do a basic headshot. It is very easy to get that same with a couple of small speedlights.
Can you overpower the sun with speedlights? No.
Do you need to be fairly close? Sure.
Can you do a simple headshot, even with a very stylized or edgy effect, with speedlights, of course.
Is there a time and place for expensive studio lights? Absolutely!
But this website is “Digital Photography School.com” Not studio lighting school. I would speculate that a majority of people here are struggling with apertures and on camera flash and are using <$1000 camera systems. Showing off with how Profoto studio lights can solve every lights problem, well, I think a bit of overkill for this site. How about, how to do some cool shots with one or two speedlights–off camera. Or how about an article on how to balance manual, off camera flash with ambient (be sure to define ambient).
April 22nd, 2011 at 9:23 am
The title of the article “Small Lighing for big results”. I don’t think you know what small light is. Get a clue.
April 22nd, 2011 at 11:49 am
Would anyone recomend any of the lighting kits that are sold on amazon.com for low prices?
Thanks.
April 22nd, 2011 at 11:53 am
Or maybe is it better to use flashes? Thanks again!!
April 22nd, 2011 at 2:40 pm
Don’t be so mean to Luke – he is putting effort and energy into helping all of us think of lighting in a different way. We all walk away from these articles with something different cause we are all at different levels of ability. Stop shooting down the messenger and think outside the box.
I would love to see some of you critiques come up with articles of your own to contribute to this site.
April 22nd, 2011 at 10:00 pm
Totally agree with Diane here.
@Jeremy “How about, how to do some cool shots with one or two speedlights–off camera. Or how about an article on how to balance manual, off camera flash with ambient (be sure to define ambient).”
How about you write them? Love to read them.
April 22nd, 2011 at 10:12 pm
Nice article on speedlighting…. I guess the colour warmth could also be achieved by adjusting the WB to cloudy?
April 23rd, 2011 at 1:07 am
All you people complaining are missing the point. This set up is just an example. You can use almost any lights and get the same results. I will say that main light does not fall into the small light category. 1200 w/s small? Really? But still informative.
April 23rd, 2011 at 3:01 am
I give him credit: the photos look great! Very creative. Great light. He’s obviously very talented and accomplished. My problem with the article is that it gives the impression that you have to have studio strobes in order get those kinds of shots and that is definitely not the case. Small flashes are very capable as main lights as long as you understand and work around their limitations. Since this site includes a great many newbie and developing photographers (myself included), it would be a shame to send the message that one must have big lights in order to get really well lit shots.
April 23rd, 2011 at 7:18 am
I really appreciate your input guys.
This gives me a great idea on what the audience is for lighting and how to approach future articles.
April 26th, 2011 at 9:45 pm
Thanks for the post, Luke. Some very interesting insights into how to approach controlled lighting, even for those like me who don’t have access to the type of equipment used. I may not be able to use what you’ve shown us immediately, but it does give one an idea of what is possible without an abundance of resources. For the rest of you who are getting hung up on costs, etc… take a step back and appreciate the chance to swap ideas and learn from someone else’s experience and creativity. I’ll certainly be thinking slightly differently next time I haul out my EX430 (which is all the extra lighting I own) and exploring fresh possibilities. Thanks again, Luke, for taking the time and effort to share some of your knowledge with us.
April 27th, 2011 at 1:39 pm
Your matchstick men aro sooooooooo cute!!
April 27th, 2011 at 2:17 pm
Wow, I wasn’t expecting the lighting used to be that extensive but I realize that is beside the point. I just wanted to say thank you to Luke and all the contributing photographers. I hope that some of the harsher critics will remember that it is very hard to find someone to spend time and effort to help others. Everything I have learned about photography has been through the school of hard knocks. There were very few who were ever willing to share their knowledge with me…thanks and keep up the good work, I appreciate it.
April 28th, 2011 at 4:42 am
Just wondering where the Small Lighting part is in this post….
I thought small lighting would mean getto type lighting….
May 24th, 2011 at 12:42 pm
Lights does change many images. Now, I see the importance of having too much or too little light.
Leave a Reply