Photo Mechanic by Camera Bits : Review
In this post Sime asks Ste’ to review Photo Mechanic by Camera Bits .
I’m not a professional photo journalist, however, I do tend to hang around with a number of them and I know for a fact that most of them rabbit on about their work flow and how it can be a real nightmare sometimes. The idea of a photo journalist is that they take the photos that the news outlets want to see and print, stick them on their laptops as quickly as possible during or after the event and run them up in some piece of software that allows them to compare, choose, tag, edit, keyword and upload all as fast as is humanly possible. I have asked a friend and UK Press Photographer, Stephen Simpson.

what you DON'T want to happen!
Photo Mechanic
As a busy UK press photographer finding the right software to complete my work flow and get my images to the picture desk as soon as possible is a priority. I was using Apple Aperture for a number of years on my Macbook 2.5ghz Intel Core 2Duo, but as my workload increased, Aperture seemed to be holding me back. It would take a few minutes to boot up and occasionally I would get locked out whilst it rendered previews. It really did start to make the difference between getting the images to the desk quickly and not.
After asking around fellow snappers, it soon became apparent that most of them use Photo Mechanic (PM) by Camera Bits. I found myself wondering if this was a professionals secret. How had I never heard of it? I set out to investigate it as an option for processing my images.
I downloaded an evaluation copy from Camerabits.com. Their very basic website didn’t inspire confidence initially but did promise ‘The Essence of Editing’ and ‘The Ultimate Professional Work flow Tool’. It offered a ‘fast and easy to use image browser’ It also had a comprehensive manual within the support documents which proved invaluable as I stumbled my way through the initial hours of use.
The first thing I noticed was the speed at which the program opens, upon clicking on the icon in the Dock it opens within seconds. In the first instance I opened a folder from within my pictures folder and was very impressed at the speed at which it displayed the images I had chosen. Photo Mechanic has a very simple, yet increasingly familiar, interface. Folders are listed on the left of the screen, with a large main central window in which to view your thumbnails and images. The uncluttered top toolbar has no more than five tools, no silly symbols or clutter but words that make it very clear what instruction you wish to be carried out.

Photo Mechanic
Further investigation found a very comprehensive set of preferences, and setting up folders and directories for your image catalogue is relatively easy. The interestingly named ‘ingest’ function is completely customisable, allowing for the same preferences to be set for all incoming images. You can even add general captions at the point of ‘ingestion’

Photo Mechanic - Captioning
Once the images are ingested there is a very quick and slick set of shortcuts, sorting and most importantly captioning options available to you. The beauty of the interface is that you can start working on the first images before the card has even finished ingesting. I tend to favour the tagging function as I zoom through the images to be edited, I then use the copy function to keep the chosen images in a new directory. These are the images I then edit and caption all from within PM. I think it is important to point out that Photo Mechanic is not an editing platform but does allow direct editing in your favourite editing platform, in my case Photoshop.

Photo mechanic - Tagging
Once cropped and tweaked in your editor, PM comes into its own with the easy to use captioning interface. You can save captions before the shoot, which can then be pulled back and added to your edited images, allowing for very speedy results. You can copy and paste captions simply from groups of images and, most importantly, you can add frequently used metadata at the click of a button.
Once you are happy with your images you can then start sizing and sending them to the desk with the built in FTP client or email.
I use Photo Mechanic for a very specific purpose, essentially editing and captioning images which need to be moved quickly onto picture desks. With this in mind, it is a professional piece of kit and does exactly what it should, without any fuss. It’s quick and simple to use, has very quickly become an essential part of my workflow, and sits very comfortably inside my bag.
THIS NEWS JUST IN – Camera Bits Announces Educational Discounts on New Licenses and Upgrades for Photo Mechanic Browser and Workflow Software (Thanks, Vanessa!)
Tags: camera bits, Photo Mechanice, review



12 Responses to “Photo Mechanic by Camera Bits : Review” - Add Yours
August 8th, 2009 at 3:24 am
Honestly, looks a lot like Adobe Bridge that comes with most photoshop packages.
Using this kind of software can speed up ANY image workflow – I use bridge ALL THE TIME!
August 8th, 2009 at 3:28 am
Lightroom would do the job as well with better ingestion.
August 8th, 2009 at 6:54 am
Picasa is an awesome program too. It’s not very good with RAW images though.
August 8th, 2009 at 7:13 am
Can Photo Mechanic batch resize photos? I’ve never been able to figure that out.
August 8th, 2009 at 8:11 am
I’m so used to Lightroom by now that I can hardly change my software and workflow.
August 8th, 2009 at 8:27 am
a – Yes.
reznor – if you’re not a press / editorial photog, I’d stay with Lightroom… the point was, PM is much quicker than LR on ingestion – but not as much a full package for developing images.
Allan – I agree, probably even better if you constantly shoot RAW…
Sime
August 10th, 2009 at 9:59 am
There are many features in PM that you have not mentioned that the other packages like lightroom and aperture do not do.
1. Code replacement – the ability to have a pre-loaded list of competitors with their numbers which in any field you use a shortcut with their number and up pops their names, club name or anything you have set in the preloaded file. Using this feature I have 3000 images keyworded with competitors names in one night.
2. I know youmentioned the speed, but I will mention it again, there is nothing on the market that matches the speed of this product.
3. To a, yes PM has a resizing feature, it is in the save as dialogue.
What you have to remember is that this package is aimed at PJ’s, it does not have pixel editing, only a basis crop. It does allow you however to edit with Photoshop. PM is not my workflow, it’s part of my workflow on certain jobs, especially news work. For everything else I use Aperture and Photoshop.
Basic cropping and outputting to the news services with extra fast speed is what this is designed for and it is the industry standard for doing so.
Oh and a couple of other cool features, if you lock a photo in your camera (if it has that feature), then it is automatically tagged in PM, and PM recognises the audio file and allows you to play it if you are using voice annotations in your camera (if your camera has that feature)
Mike B
August 15th, 2009 at 7:00 am
As was stated in the review, Photo Mechanic is intended for workflow and not for editing your pictures. I have tried Aperture, Adobe Bridge, and Picasa, and as others have commented, none of them are as fast as Photo Mechanic for ingesting pictures, sorting through them, editing the metadata, and renaming the files. If your picture handling needs are modest, than as someone else pointed out, Photo Mechanic my be overkill and using Aperture, Lightroom, or Adobe Bridge may be sufficient.
August 24th, 2009 at 2:46 pm
I still like FastStone Image Viewer, does almost everything its small, fast, and its free.
August 27th, 2009 at 2:56 am
To j.mac I like FastStone Image Viewer as well and I use it for most things…it is very fast and easy to use especially for transferring images to my computer. However, FastStone lacks one major thing: the ability to add IPTC tags and captions and geolocation information. If you don’t care about tags and geotags then Image Viewer is really the best considering it’s free. But if tags and geotags are important Picasa is the only free alternative. XnView also allows inserting IPTC tags but not geotags since they should be in the EXIF portion of the metadata.
PhotoMecanic seems to be the master of image metadata. I don’t use it but have read about it a lot and I might purchase it one of these days when I can justify the expense.
September 15th, 2009 at 6:09 am
Don’t forget the ability to ingest multiple memory cards at once, being able to do a live upload of selects to FTP / Web (ZenFolio for me – its critical for backing up off-site) and the awesome file naming / meta. Lightroom is *almost there* but simply isn’t as fast or powerful on the meta end. Also, this software allows you to save to a second location upon ingestion in either JPG or the original format. Again, critical for redundancy for me.
I ingest anywhere from 2000-6000 photos – At a time.
In a period of a week I can easily go through 15,000 photos (no, don’t buy used cameras from me!) so work flow is EXTREMELY important on the ingestion end.
Photo Mechanic > Lightroom > Photoshop is my current work flow.
October 17th, 2009 at 11:50 pm
Man, this is one killer samsung digital camera, check out this review.
Leave a Reply