Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 – Review
Note: Updated Review – The editor of this amazing Web site has kindly allowed me to revise my review of the Panasonic FZ35 camera. In hindsight, it needed a bit of a brush up!
Some people, using a digital SLR, find it a hassle to continually change lenses when shooting a wide variety of subjects. Frankly, it goes with ‘SLR-territory’ (digital and film) and is the price you pay to enjoy the improved image of an interchangeable lens, reflex camera.
In reality, unless you’re very demanding and continually shoot magazine quality pictures, most times you’re better off with a fixed lens digicam with an extended zoom range … like this one.
This Panasonic model has a modest 18x optical zoom that runs from 4.8-86.4mm or, in 35 SLR equivalence, 27-486mm. For many people this is long enough … many people have found handheld ultra long zooms pulled full out to maximum tele give serious problems in steadiness. Tripod territory.
Its amazingly tiny CCD measures 10.9mm in the diagonal, but is still capable of capturing a 12.1 million pixel image, leading to a maximum image size of 4000×3000 pixels.
This camera is capable of RAW capture as well as JPEG … and of course RAW+JPEG simultaneously.
Coupled with this attractive factor, the FZ35 also shoots High Def movies with 1280 x 720 pixel resolution and stereo sound using the AVCHD Lite (MPEG-4/H.264) codec, which seems not to have been taken up by other makers.
AVCHD Lite offers a considerable saving in file size: it’s half that of full AVCHD. You can also select lower movie quality settings: 848 x 480, 640 x 480 and 320 x 240 … the latter useful for Web transmission.
The FZ35, unlike many other digicams, has the ability to use the optical zoom while you’re shooting movies. The FZ35’s movie zoom operates in a gentle fashion — not jerky — and adds to the viewer enjoyment of movie clips. Another nice touch is that stills and movie shooting each have dedicated buttons.
When it comes to download time the FZ35 provides a USB 2.0 port, through which you can also export composite video and sound as well as a mini HDMI port, to which you can attach an optional lead to a High Def TV set. If you have one of the company’s VIERA TVs, you can control the camera’s playback functions with a VIERA remote control.
In their wisdom, Panasonic has simplified the optical stabiliser to two modes: off and on. I’ve always found the company’s stabiliser to be an excellent one but you may find it’s best to cancel it when the camera is on a tripod — one fights the other.
Memory
40 MB of internal memory is useful for a short shooting spree but when you need a card you can load up an SD or SDHC, with the latter as preferred card for movie shooting; I had some early advice that it is OK use a Class 4 card with the camera; this info has since been revised to Class 6 or better.
Viewing: the camera has two LCD screens, one mounted in the turret above the lens and the other at the rear, a 6.9 cm screen. Frankly, whilst the former is preferable for bright daylight shot lineups, the resolution is so poor, in most cases you’re better off to persevere with the large, higher res rear screen. Besides, the camera auto adjusts the rear screen brightness according to ambience levels … I found it quite easy to line up, zoom in, then shoot, even with sunlight falling directly onto the screen. Well done!
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 Features
The FZ35 has a useful range of exposure modes — auto, Program AE, aperture and shutter priority and manual — plus a battery of scene modes for the adventurous photographer’s without the skills to drive the camera in ‘manual’.
Metering options for both stills and movies include multi zone, centre-weighted and spot readings.
Of course it has face recognition and can also recognise faces registered from previous shots, so focus and exposure are optimised.
A plus is the FZ35’s ability to shoot movies with manually adjusted aperture or shutter speed as well as colour effects — B&W, sepia, a coolish or a warm rendering — as well as scene modes. My advice is to use these with care and try to shoot a run of shots using an effect to comprise a whole sequence — and not shoot the occasional random shot.

Test shot: ISO 80 f8 1/10 sec.

Test shot: ISO 400 f8 1/50 sec.

Test shot: ISO 1600 f8 1/200 sec.
In my assessment, the camera’s ISO 400 setting is very useable for ordinary photography. It’s only when you reach ISO 800 and above that the noise begins to be a problem. A very good performance.
Startup Time
I could start shooting just two seconds after power-up, with follow on shots coming in at about one second intervals.
Distortion
I was surprised to find the lens exhibited no distortion at either end of the zoom range. Top lens!
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 Verdict
I thoroughly enjoyed my time with the FZ35. It’s compact, easy to use and, with its 18x zoom, a powerful image capture tool.
The camera handled flare particularly well, snaring bright, well-coloured and sharp shots. The exposure systems were noticeably accurate.
A perfect camera for the traveller.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 Specifications
- Image Sensor: 12.1 million effective pixels.
- Metering: Averaging; centre-weighted; spot.
- Effective Sensor Size: 10.9mm diameter.
- Memory: SD and SDHC cards.
- Image Sizes (pixels): 4000×3000, 4000×2672, 4000×2248, 3264×2488, 3264×1840, 3264×2176, 2560×1920, 2560×1440, 2048×1536, 2048×1360, 1920×1080, 1600×1200, 640×480.
- File Formats: JPEG, RAW.
- ISO Sensitivity: Auto, 100 to 1600.
- Flash: Auto, red-eye reduction, red-eye reduction slow sync, first and second curtain sync, forced on and off.
- Power: Rechargeable lithium ion battery, AC.
- Dimensions: 117.6×75.8×88.9 WHDmm.
- Weight: Approx. 367 g (minus battery).







46 Responses to “Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 – Review” - Add Yours
November 21st, 2009 at 6:24 am
You say in your intro “Panasonic has not indulged in a longish zoom camera before, unlike Canon, Nikon and Olympus, and its first such camera, the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35, possesses a modest 18x optical zoom…” However, Panasonic has been pumping out new super-zoom “bridge” compacts just like this one every 6 months since the FZ1 in 2003.
November 21st, 2009 at 6:26 am
Panasonic has a long history of super- and megazoom compact cameras, stretching back at least as far as the Lumix DMC-FZ1 from 2002.
Panasonic’s LX series of compacts has always featured RAW capture, and they date back to 2005.
November 21st, 2009 at 6:31 am
Good review overall, but there are a couple things that should be pointed out:
- In the third paragraph, you write “Panasonic has not indulged in a longish zoom camera before, unlike Canon, Nikon and Olympus, and its first such camera, the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35…” Panasonic has sold many long zoom cameras, including the FZ35’s predecessors the DMC-FZ28 and DMC-FZ18. This should probably be corrected.
- Distortion: Although it is increasingly common these days, Panasonic applies distortion correction to the JPEG’s in camera and when converting RAW files using their software. Converting the RAW files using third party software reveals much more distortion. Not a dealbreaker, but worth mentioning.
I own the DMC-FZ28 and it’s a great camera. Thanks for writing this review of their latest entry.
November 21st, 2009 at 6:32 am
“Panasonic has not indulged in a longish zoom camera before” — you mean, like the FZ28 (which, by the way, also does RAW).
In my experience with the FZ28, the reach of the lens is great, but I’m really not knocked out by the quality of the images, which seem to be pretty noisy, especially at ISO 400 and above. Is this any different in the FZ35?
How’s the sound quality on video recording? It looks like they’ve changed the mic’s on this, vs. the FZ28, which is good, because sound quality on the FZ28 was truly dismal.
All in all, I’d rather have seen them bump up the size of the sensor, rather than squeezing a higher pixel count out of this camera.
November 21st, 2009 at 6:37 am
“was surprised to find the lens exhibited no distortion at either end of the zoom range.”
Really? None? Do you mean that it produces no pincushion or barrel distortion?
I have the FZ28 (which has a longish zoom). An amazing camera; especially when you get it on a tripod.
I always enjoy reading about these new cameras, but when posting a review, a comparison to the last model–or at least, citing their differences–is tremendously helpful.
Thanks!
November 21st, 2009 at 6:44 am
Yeah, D. Lambert, on your first point this review is simply wrong; Panasonic has produced several versions of superzoom bridge cameras over many years. I remember seriously considering a Panasonic Lumix FZ-20 and FZ-30 back in 2006.
I actually found this review to be pretty poor and inaccurate on a number of points. Very disappointing, IMO.
November 21st, 2009 at 6:44 am
“This camera also has a feature that Panasonic has never installed in its compact range before as far as I know: it’s capable of RAW capture as well as JPEG … and of course RAW+JPEG simultaneously.”
Look at the DMC-LX2 and DMC-LX3. I think the LX2 does RAW+JPEG if you choose RAW – that is, I don’t think there’s a way to do only RAW with the LX2. But I believe the LX3 can do RAW only. I have the LX2 not the LX3. A really really sweet compact camera line, btw. The DMC-LX3 is considered the photographer’s compact, starting with its f/2-2.8 zoom (though limited reach).
November 21st, 2009 at 7:36 am
Even though the review seems to lack some of the finer points of the camera, I can say that my ownership of it so far has been wonderful. I’ll be spending a lot of time learning its in and outs. In fact, the one bad point I can make about the camera is that it’s possibly too complicated for some purposes.
November 21st, 2009 at 7:40 am
Also, the FZ-18s and FZ28s both shot RAW.
Factcheck. Seriously.
November 21st, 2009 at 7:52 am
FYI, here are some notes I jotted on the FZ28 when I bought it. I’d still like to know whether the FZ35 improves on any of the areas I’ve found lacking in the FZ28.
http://digital-photography-school.com/forum/other-brands-digital-cameras/57949-just-bought-panasonic-fz28-first-impressions.html
November 21st, 2009 at 9:29 am
I just bought this camera primarily for video, but also have have a travel camera (my Canon 40D is a tad too big). I love this camera. I can’t believe they left off a flash shoe, that really baffles me. But for $320 from Amazon, I’m not complaining. I’ve loved the video quality and stills as well. The big issue so far with RAW is that Aperture won’t read them so I’ve been using the Beta 3 of Lightroom. I will say that the stills seem to have a lot more digitial noise than I would have expected.
November 21st, 2009 at 10:11 am
Great review, thanks for the time and attention to this new model. My wife and I both owned the 35’s predecessor, and loved it a lot. We’re looking forward to new 35’s, hopefully very soon. I shot with Canon and Minolta SLR’s for many years, film and digital, with many lenses, but after our DMC’s, I really don’t see myself going back. As you say, unless you’re shooting for magazines (who always spread your best shot across a center fold anyway … ARGH! :) ), I really find myself much more consistently creating shots I love with this line of cameras. I’m also looking forward to the enhanced video capability, as the older model didn’t allow zooming while recording. We liked the video quality over all, but this sounds much better. The light weight, ease of use, wide shooting range (sensitivity and zoom range) make this a wonderful camera for most travel and home use, as well as our artistic shooting. We can’t wait to try the 35!
November 21st, 2009 at 2:55 pm
Only after reading the first couple of paragraph, I found this reviewer probably not familiar with Panasonic product.
Panasonic is one of the first company that bring out superzoon bridge camera to the market from the FZ1 12X until the recent FZ35 18X
Panasonic is also the manufacturer that provide RAW format in its compact, from the LX1 onward.
How can I expect someone who does not know the product to provide a decent review?
November 21st, 2009 at 9:37 pm
The LX3 can record RAW+JPEG. That should clear that ‘panasonic has never enabled RAW + JPEG’ statement.
It’s about time some exposure is given to this camera.
When is DPS going to review the LX3? After the LX4 is released? C’mon…
November 22nd, 2009 at 1:30 pm
Wow, the reviewer doesn’t really know Panasonic very well.
“This camera also has a feature that Panasonic has never installed in its compact range before as far as I know: it’s capable of RAW capture as well as JPEG … and of course RAW+JPEG simultaneously.”
I own an FZ-8 (late 2006/early 2007). It shoots RAW and has a 12x, 36-432mm (35mm equiv), lens. It was replaced by the FZ-18 which was in turn replaced by the FZ-28 and then the FZ35. All shoot RAW and have “longish” lenses.
November 23rd, 2009 at 11:42 am
Which planet are you on, Barrie? On planet Earth, Panasonic has been selling superzoom cameras, and followed up with new models yearly, since this type of cameras first appeared. They were able to do so because they have the best anti-shake system, something that longish zooms need.
November 23rd, 2009 at 12:28 pm
Still not entirely accurate: AVCHD is the new standard that will (albeit slowly) be used by many HD manufacturers including Canon.
Also, the lens does exhibit some barrel distortion at the wide end and pincushion at the long. Brick-Wall-O-Shame test!
November 24th, 2009 at 1:45 am
I have been shooting with my FZ18 for 1 1/2 years now and dearly love it. It has travelled the world with me and never let me down. I can think of at least 4 people who have bought the FZ18 and FZ28 after looking at some of my pics and holding my camera. My only gripe is low light shots without a tripod….
I am getting an DSLR, but my FZ18 will always be close at hand!
November 27th, 2009 at 1:33 am
For Jason who said Aperture wouldn’t read the RAW files from the FZ35, you should be able to download an updated version of the RAW converter which will allow you to read the files from your FZ 35.
November 28th, 2009 at 11:33 am
As far as my research goes this camera is perfect for me. I think the HD video makes it special. None of the competitors have that. I’ve looked at Canon PowerShot SX20 IS, Casio Exilim EX-FH20, Kodak EasyShare Z980, Nikon Coolpix P90, Olympus SP-590 Ultra Zoom, Pentax X70, and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1 and I am very confused because the internet is full of reviews about them but not so much about the FZ35. I really like what I read about this camera. Or should I buy a Rebel XS SLR. Is it so much difference?
Can someone give me some advice on what to choose at around 400$, please. I already missed Black Friday searching around :D
Thank you in advance.
November 28th, 2009 at 1:32 pm
As I mentioned earlier, I’ve got the FZ28, and if I were to do it all over again, I’d be really tempted to go with an SLR. I believe the Panasonic line is right up there with the best of the “bridge” cameras, but when you get into marginal shooting conditions, you’re just asking too much from a small sensor and a small piece of glass. Unfortunately, it seems like “marginal conditions” show up an awful lot of the time, and when you don’t have great lighting, the quality of any bridge camera is going to be less than a DSLR.
If $400 is all you plan on spending *ever*, then the FZ35 is probably a very good choice, but if you could get into a cheap DSLR now – maybe even by picking up a used camera, then you can add onto it by buying lenses – the good lenses seem to hold their value very well, and you can keep them if / when you upgrade your camera.
The two advantages that the Panny’s got that you just can’t touch are cost and portability. In order to get the same technical versatility (still + video, etc) and lens reach, you have to spend more in a DSLR, but this gap is shrinking all the time. This camera is also still lighter and smaller than an equivalent body + lens. For me, this is worth something, because I use mine camping / hiking / canoeing, etc., and I think I’d really struggle to bring a full DSLR setup on some of these trips.
Do you know what kind of shooting you plan to do? Do you have a camera that you’re replacing? If so, what are you trying to improve?
November 28th, 2009 at 2:09 pm
Thank you for your response. Let me answer all your questions by telling you that I am far from being a professional in this art of photography. And I don’t have the time nor the money to improve that anytime soon. I just like to travel, like you said, and capture things that worth it, and I get frustrated when, with cheap cameras, the battery drains after a few hours, or I miss a few X-es of zoom. You’ve put the dot on the i when you said that FZ35 has got as advantages cost, portability and versatility. Now, like everyone, I’d like to take the full advantages of the money I spend. But is this camera worth it? Is it something better out there? The SLRs are out of discussion for the moment, and from the technical specifications, this camera meets almost all of my demands. What I want to find out is what the experts are saying about this camera, and what the actual test are saying. So I am frustrated that this particular model is less popular than Canon for example. Someone recommended me the Pentax Optio X70 but I don’t see nothing special compared to the FZ35.
November 29th, 2009 at 5:13 am
Unfortunately, most reviews of compact digicams omit testing in subdued light. Since many of us like these cameras for travel, and interiors and dusk shots can be appealing, I’ve found my FZ7 to produce quite grainy shots under these conditions, and ISO 400 is just as bad. Has Panasonic improved this in the FZ35, or is it just a function of the tiny imager?
December 6th, 2009 at 12:49 am
I own the panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ8, I also shoot with a Nikon D40. It’s true that the panasonic has a very clear lens. I can go through my pictures viewed in picasa and pick out the photo’s that where taken with the Panasonic, altra clear. But it is also true that it does start to drop off in low light.
The Nikon D40 also takes very good photos and has the edge in low light. If the Nikon Camera was used with a very good lens like the 35mm f/1.8 or the 55mm F/1.8 it is just as sharp or sharper than the Panasonic in my opinion.
You can do more with a DSLR but the convenience of just carrying the Panasonic with just the one zoom lens, is a big plus compared to hauling around several lenses. With all this said, I still think the DSLR cameras have the most advantages. I will make use of both depending where and what I’ll be shooting.
December 15th, 2009 at 12:11 pm
I have been a Canon (20D) user for a few years. I had the hot-shoe ($500) flash, an “L” lens ($1,600), 5 other lenses ($2,000?), plus accessories including home studio equipment. The 20D frustrated me sometimes because of the softness of images, at times blurry. When I confronted other Canon users about this, I was told this “L” lens didn’t work well with the 20D, or there was something else like I may have purchased a “bad” 20D or I shook the camera (while on a tripod using a remote?). For the money I put into it, Canon should have included a photographer to shoot for me.
Recently, after reading several reviews, I bought this Panasonic FZ35…my first Panasonic and first “point-and-shoot” in several years. It is a fraction of the cost of a DSLR (Canon), much much lighter and produces very good, sharp, images. I am spending less time “fixing” the photos. I also don’t have to clean dust off of a sensor or mirror.
Someone asked about video. The videos are crisp as well and the camera continuously focuses and allows zooming in/out while recording in stereo. On a clean 16GB SDHC card, I can record 2 hours of HD video although I’m not real sure about battery life.
The more I use this camera, the more I like it and enjoy using it. My online gallery is currently exclusive Canon 20D shots, but I plan to phase those out and put my FZ35 photos on there. I just need to take the FZ35 out and shoot – lack of time right now.
I’m not sure what Paulie was referring to with “You can do more with a DSLR”. Maybe it was a reference to low-light situations as some others have pointed out? I have noticed some noise on the FZ35 but I would rather correct a few noisy photos in software than have to sharpen the focus in all of them (Canon). Also consider the cost of those f/1.8, or faster, lenses. I carried 70-pounds of camera, lenses and accessories in my backpack…now I don’t have to. I do think Panasonic messed up by not including a hot-shoe on this one. When I flashed my 580EX on the Canon, everyone knew it. Haha
I’m still experimenting with the shooting modes on the FZ35. I have shot crisp outdoor daylight scenes, used indoor lighting, candle lit scenes, the full moon and my Christmas tree lights. Face recognition is really cool also. I see a lot of potential with this camera and I have been motivated to get shooting again. Thanks.
December 15th, 2009 at 5:06 pm
Mike, another comment like yours and Panasonic will have one more customer :D
December 16th, 2009 at 1:31 am
Hi Mike,
It was a reference to low light situations. You sure have invested a lot of money in your lenses. My Nikon D40 could only be bought with the kit lens 18-55mm cost $600.00. Since then I have invested about $900.00 more in additional lenses I guess it all depends how deep you want to go into photography.
I shoot only for my enjoyment and shoot mostly landscapes. I also enjoy shooting at the local zoo. The problem I had was shooting indoors at the zoo with the panasonic FZ8. The lighting was very dim and in some areas flash was not allowed. That’s why I moved from the point and shoot to the Nikon DSLR
.
But I honestly think I enjoy the Panasonic FZ8 because I don’t have to carry a bag of lenses and don’t worry about the dust problems when changing lenses like I would with the D40.
So when going somewhere I would be more apt to take the FZ8 than the D40.
Right now I am debating about buying the Nikon D90 because of the lenses I already have. But I’m talking a little over $800.00 for just the D90 body. But I am seriously considering the Panasonic FZ35 and just using the D40 when I know I’ll be shooting mostly in low light.
Mike , do you know if the Panasonic FZ35 has improved the low light situation over the older FZ?
I think I would be more likely to do more shooting with the Panasonic because of the covenience of carrying the light-weight camera and mostly do it all lens.
December 16th, 2009 at 1:54 am
I’m really enjoying the comments on this thread much more than the original review. ;-)
FWIW, I’ve experienced soft focus on the FZ28, but I attribute this partially to shooting in marginal light situations, and partially to the speed of the camera itself. For example, I most recently ran into this trying to take action shots at an indoor swim meet. The lens has plenty of reach to frame a swimmer from the stands, but at that range, you’re looking at an aperture of F5+, which forces you to either lengthen your exposure (action blur) or bump the ISO (noise). I ended up shooting RAW, and using shutter-priority to hold shutter speed down to 1/160 or so, which resulted in some pretty dark images that I lightened in post-processing. Quite a few of these shots were softly-focused, but I expect that the camera really struggled to focus quickly in the conditions I was shooting.
That was a lot of monkeying around to get a marginally-passable shot, when what I really needed was bigger glass and a bigger sensor that could handle higher ISO shooting without excessive noise. Both of these are available, of course, but not for the kind of money you’d drop on an FZ35. I’m somewhat consoled by telling myself that I’m learning a ton about using the camera settings to get good results in less-than-perfect conditions, and that when I’m finally able to afford a decent DSLR setup, I think I’ll be able to take advantage of the bigger performance envelope.
Regarding video on the FZ35, how’s the sound? I’ve been very happy with the video quality of the FZ28 (low-light performance notwithstanding), but the sound is t-e-r-r-i-b-l-e. I’m curious whether the upgraded mics on the FZ35 are really any better.
December 16th, 2009 at 6:53 am
@Vlad – Haha! I do quite a bit of researching before making a purchase like this which is how I picked the FZ35 over the other point-and-shoot cameras. I could have been satisfied with Olympus or Sony as they had very good reviews, but it was probably some minor comparison I made that swayed me to the Panasonic. It could have been a simple “start-up time” or “time between shots” number.
@Paulie – I can understand the need for quality low-light shooting. Other than the moon and Christmas tree, I haven’t really played much with low-light on the FZ35. As for zoos and landscapes, I love shooting them here but just haven’t had time since purchasing this. Maybe at the end of this week I will go and see how it does. I did shoot a few pelicans during the day, however, and the images were crisp and bright without editing. I’ll see if I can upload one here. I almost went with Nikon but, as in your case with Nikon glass, all my lenses were Canon. Nikon has an excellent reputation but changing brands after a couple thousand invested in Canon just wasn’t feasible. .When I viewed sample images from higher-end Canon DSLRs (affordable higher-end), they had the same softness as my “old” 20D. Another cool feature on the FZ35 is the in-camera stitch-assist for panorama shots (wide landscapes?). There are so many modes available it will take awhile to try them all.
A couple of “cons” about this camera…(it isn’t “perfect”!)… the lens cap has to be removed manually when starting up. The LCD will even tell you when powering up that the cap is on. Minor issue? Also, on the Canon 20D I was used to the flash popping up when the camera believed flash was necessary. On the FZ35, you have to click the button to pop-up the flash. The flash cannot be up when shooting movies. One major issue everyone complains about is the memory card location – under the camera, the hinge is up against the tripod screw mount – bothersome if you use a tripod and have to change cards. I have one 16-GB card, so that isn’t a real problem. The flash is nothing (not even close) to my Canon 580EX external. But then again the 580EX itself cost more than the Panasonic camera. We’re talking 27-feet on the FZ35 vs. 109-feet with the 580EX – give or take.
(breath)
@D.Lambert – I have chatted with a lot of professional photographers and all agree that some form of editing/post-processing is required in digital photography. Even the high-end digitals are not perfect for every shot. I really need to get out and shoot with this one to give you a usable idea of how it does in low/marginal light conditions. I did a few close-up shots of a stuffed moose using a 25-watt lamp and experimented with portrait and close-up modes. The images were very good, bright and noise-free. As for sound, I had my daughter play her (new) acoustic guitar for me and the sound was very good. I was impressed especially since the microphones are on top of the camera (on the flash hood). Maybe I’ll upload the .MOV file to my server as an example.
You know, when the Nikon advertised movie mode on its DSLR, I didn’t understand the concept – it’s a high-quality camera built for photography, why add movies? Now after using this mode on the Panasonic – and knowing I can film 2-hours of high-quality HD video if the card is empty – I see some great potential.
I also love the AF Tracking – focus on the subject and it will keep focusing even if the subject moves.
Ok, here’s a pelican – ISO 80, f/5.6, 1/400 shutter, 347mm (35mm equiv), auto exposure, (Basically, it was full auto)
December 16th, 2009 at 7:37 am
@Vlad – Haha! I do quite a bit of researching before making a purchase like this which is how I picked the FZ35 over the other point-and-shoot cameras. I could have been satisfied with Olympus or Sony as they had very good reviews, but it was probably some minor comparison I made that swayed me to the Panasonic. It could have been a simple “start-up time” or “time between shots” number.
@Paulie – I can understand the need for quality low-light shooting. Other than the moon and Christmas tree, I haven’t really played much with low-light on the FZ35. As for zoos and landscapes, I love shooting them here but just haven’t had time since purchasing this. Maybe at the end of this week I will go and see how it does. I did shoot a few pelicans during the day, however, and the images were crisp and bright without editing. I’ll see if I can upload one here. I almost went with Nikon but, as in your case with Nikon glass, all my lenses were Canon. Nikon has an excellent reputation but changing brands after a couple thousand invested in Canon just wasn’t feasible. .When I viewed sample images from higher-end Canon DSLRs (affordable higher-end), they had the same softness as my “old” 20D. Another cool feature on the FZ35 is the in-camera stitch-assist for panorama shots (wide landscapes?). There are so many modes available it will take awhile to try them all.
A couple of “cons” about this camera…(it isn’t “perfect”!)… the lens cap has to be removed manually when starting up. The LCD will even tell you when powering up that the cap is on. Minor issue? Also, on the Canon 20D I was used to the flash popping up when the camera believed flash was necessary. On the FZ35, you have to click the button to pop-up the flash. The flash cannot be up when shooting movies. One major issue everyone complains about is the memory card location – under the camera, the hinge is up against the tripod screw mount – bothersome if you use a tripod and have to change cards. I have one 16-GB card, so that isn’t a real problem. The flash is nothing (not even close) to my Canon 580EX external. But then again the 580EX itself cost more than the Panasonic camera. We’re talking 27-feet on the FZ35 vs. 109-feet with the 580EX – give or take. (breath)
@D.Lambert – I have chatted with a lot of professional photographers and all agree that some form of editing/post-processing is required in digital photography. Even the high-end digitals are not perfect in every shot. I really need to get out and shoot with this one to give you a usable idea of how it does in low/marginal light conditions. I did a few close-up shots of a stuffed moose using a 25-watt lamp and experimented with portrait and close-up modes. The images were very good, bright and noise-free. As for sound, I had my daughter play her (new) acoustic guitar for me and the sound was very good. I was impressed especially since the microphones are on top of the camera (on the flash hood). Maybe I’ll upload the .MOV file to my server as an example.
You know, when the Nikon advertised movie mode on its DSLR, I didn’t understand the concept – it’s a high-quality camera built for photography, why add movies? Now after using this mode on the Panasonic – and knowing I can film 2-hours of high-quality HD video if the card is empty – I see some great potential.
I also love the AF Tracking – focus on the subject and it will keep focusing even if the subject moves.
Ok, here’s a pelican – ISO 80, f/5.6, 1/400 shutter, 347mm (35mm equiv), auto exposure, (Basically, it was full auto)
December 16th, 2009 at 8:01 am
(My image link in the previous comment doesn’t look right…hmm)
Here is a link to my first video with the FZ35, converted to Quicktime MOV format. When I play this locally, it is in sync with the audio and not pixelated. However, playing it online gives a different result. Other than conversion, no editing or modifications were done. Hand-held the camera. Approx 8.5 MB. My daughter plays her new acoustic guitar for the first time also. :-)
The audio sounds good on my laptop, but I can’t hear stereo separation…? (the mics on the FZ35 are close together)
FZ35 movie in Quicktime format
December 16th, 2009 at 8:25 am
I’m waiting for the new top here for the P&S.
December 16th, 2009 at 12:15 pm
I hope I’m not too much of an amateur for this discussion, but here goes. I just purchased the FZ35, after using the FZ50 for 2 years. I was happy with my pictures with the FZ50, but since most of my shots are taken on birding trips, I was looking for something smaller and lighter to tote around….and the 18x zoom was very attractive. The new camera fills the bill in that respect and takes nice shots of people, landscapes, etc. But I’m having trouble getting crisp pictures on early morning shots of birds…colors seem washed out or muddy,often slightly out of focus, and cropping just gives me a closer but more pixilated image. I have been using the Automatic mode and outside sports mode.
I view and share most of my pictures on the computer. Would I be better off not using the full zoom, and cropping the picture? Is the low morning light one of the “low light” problems I hear people talking about ? Any comments would be most welcome!
December 17th, 2009 at 12:17 am
Hello Kris. I consider myself an amateur photographer and it feels like I’m starting over with a new camera – new menu choices, new features, new shutter speeds (I never used a 1/4 shutter speed that I know of).
When you said “Automatic mode”, are you referring to the iA (Intelligent Auto) or “P” mode? Are the birds stationary or in flight? Are you using only the optical zoom or are you adding the digital zoom? Digital zoom will add pixelation, which is a major reason why I opted for a high optical-zoom camera. I only needed digital zoom to photograph the moon. At higher zoom (tele), you’ll lose f/stops and the ISO may bump itself up to compensate. I bump up the exposure (left joystick then up a couple times). I just changed the “Maximum ISO” setting in the menu to 400 instead of 800 in “P” mode. Will see what that does. Are you shooting RAW or JPG? We need to see how you define low-light and compare that to what the camera is deciding. Try a couple of shots in Program mode or go Manual, Aperture or Shutter priority. Adjust the ISO, metering mode and focus method. If lowering the ISO darkens the image, increase the exposure. I use the histogram all the time.
Ok, I’m off for 3 days now so I need to go shoot something.
December 17th, 2009 at 12:51 am
Hi Mike, Thanks for the reply. I was unable to pull up the photo of the Pelican ’http://www.thephotositook.com/P1000076sm.JPG’ title=’P1000076sm.JPG’ />
I would have liked to have seen It.
Since reading the articals on the DMC- FZ35, I have been famiarlizing myself with my FZ8 again. I will take some photographs with the FZ8 and The Nikon D40 and compare them.
I really do like the Nikon D40 and wonder why I want to step up to the D90. Maybe I’ll think more about buying a wide lens. I already have the 18-55mm, 35.mm f/1.8, 50mm f/1.8 and a Tamron 18-270mm lens.
Mike, I have just turned 74 years old and am fairly new to all this. As soon as I figure out how to post some of my photos i’ll post them to get some opinions that will help me improve.
But keep me informed about the Panasonic FZ35. I still like convenience of carrying the light weight camera with that 27mm-486mm lens with only an extra battery and card.
I am really enjoying all the opinoins in these reviews. I am really concerned about the low light situation with the Fz35.
So please keep me informed,
December 17th, 2009 at 12:54 am
Hi Mike, Thanks for the reply. I was unable to pull up the photo of the Pelican ’http://www.thephotositook.com/P1000076sm.JPG’ title=’P1000076sm.JPG’ />
I would have liked to have seen It.
Since reading the articals on the DMC- FZ35, I have been famiarlizing myself with my FZ8 again. I will take some photographs with the FZ8 and The Nikon D40 and compare them.
I really do like the Nikon D40 and wonder why I want to step up to the D90. Maybe I’ll think more about buying a wide lens. I already have the 18-55mm, 35mm f/1.8, 50mm f/1.8 and a Tamron 18-270mm lens.
Mike, I have just turned 74 years old and am fairly new to all this. As soon as I figure out how to post some of my photos I’ll post them to get some opinions that will help me improve.
But keep me informed about the Panasonic FZ35. I still like convenience of carrying the light weight camera with that 27mm-486mm lens with only an extra battery and card.
I am really enjoying all the opinoins in these reviews. I am really concerned about the low light situation with the Fz35.
So please keep me informed,
December 17th, 2009 at 1:03 am
Hello Paulie! The original link did not look right when I saw it in my comment. I resized the image to fit here, as suggested by the “Note:” (below the comment box). The original is very large.
I’ll try posting a regular link below…
My first pelican photo…?
And I tried adding the image to the comment using the “clicking here” link but it wasn’t working…
December 17th, 2009 at 4:07 am
Hello Paulie! The original link did not look right when I saw it in my comment. I resized the image to fit here, as suggested by the “Note:” (below the comment box). The original is very large.
I’ll try posting a regular link below…
My first pelican photo/resized
You have a nice assortment of lenses. Depending on your zoo or when shooting other wildlife, it helps to have a good zoom. Your 270mm should bring the subject pretty close.
Here’s a photo taken with my Canon 20D (at 200mm on a monopod) of a male lion: Lion at Busch Gardens (click the image and it will enlarge) – I had to sharpen it quite a bit. I will be going back there tomorrow or Friday with the FZ35 and will take new pics.
December 17th, 2009 at 8:18 am
Hi Mike,
The pictures you took were very nice, I really enjoyed them. The next trip to Florida I will make it a point to visit Busch Gardens, It looks like a photographers paradise.
I usually go to Brookfield zoo, in Brookfield ILLinois. They are doing a lot of work inlarging different areas to make life easier for the animals. The area they refurbished for the elephants is very nice, but not so much for taking pictures. there are large metal posts with four rows of heavy cable all around. I try to zoom in- between the cables. That works as long as the elephants are further away.
I will have my two grandsons here on Sunday, maybe they can show me how to post some photos.
If and when I post some photographs don’t be too hard on me
December 17th, 2009 at 8:36 am
Hello Mike,
Thanks for all your helpful hints. If you consider yourself an amateur, then I am 3 steps below that! I have been using iA and the outside sports mode. The birds I’m photographing are usually in trees, and the darn things hardly ever hold still. Or they are shorebirds at a pretty good distance. I only use optical zoom as I haven’t heard many positive comments about digital. And I shoot in JPG. I will venture away from iA, and play with P mode, changing the ISO and exposure as you suggested. I read an article from someone who takes wildlife pictures and he suggested using the highest shutter speed possible….by using Aperture priority (ok, now I’m scratching my head….why not Shutter priority?). Anyway, your ideas all make sense and I will get out there and try them. Thanks again!
December 21st, 2009 at 1:20 am
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 Digital Camera Battery, Type: Li-ion, Volt: 7.2V, Capacity: 710mAh, Color: Dark blue, Weight: 43.5g, Length: 44.50×35.85×18.85mm, 1 year warranty!
http://www.panasonic-battery-charger.com/battery-charger=1865.htm
December 22nd, 2009 at 7:02 am
Hi,
I’m fairly new to all this. I am trying to attach a photograph to this comment. Well here goes.
This is a photograph I took while in Door County this last fall. all comments welcome good or bad.
Thanks,
Paulie
December 22nd, 2009 at 9:35 am
Hi,
I am trying to attach a photograph to this comment. This was taken at Ellison Bay in Door County.
All comments are welcome good or bad.
Thanks,
Paulie
December 22nd, 2009 at 9:51 am
Hi again,
I don’t know why I’m having such a hard time attaching a photograph to this comment, but here goes again.
Photo was taken at Ellison Bay in Door County, Wisconsin.
All comments good or bad are welcome.
Paulie
Picasa DSC_0123.jpg
December 23rd, 2009 at 2:18 am
Hello, I look forward to visiting Door County every year, The fall is just beautiful there.
Here is a photograph I took in October 2009.
I really took an interest in photography about a year ago. All Comments are welcome good or bad
Thank you. http://lh5.ggpht.com/_rmlA8v0bBNw/SzDr_yLBYSI/AAAAAAAAA5M/D7yhdMIAhDQ/s400/DSC_0123.JPG
Hope I’m doing this right…………….
February 3rd, 2010 at 2:18 am
I tried a FZ28 with excellent results. However, I exchanged this unit for a FZ35. Unfortunately, the results were soft focus and less saturation and contrast. Returned this unit and purchased another FZ28. This particular FZ28 sample exhibited soft focus. Can sample to sample variation be this significant? All cameras were adjusted and used the same as well as the same printing. What’s happening? Thanks.
Don
Leave a Reply