Lightroom 3 Print Improvements
With Lightroom 3 Beta having just been released, the first thing that most people will do – as I did – is to look and see if the features that you’ve always wanted in the program have been added.
One of the areas that Lightroom 2 fell a little short on in my book was the Print module. I wanted to be able to print with a colored background without having to import a background to use as a Identity Plate to achieve the effect and I wanted to be able to assemble a single printed sheet incorporating multiple images but I didn’t want them to have to always be the same size.
Ok, so the good news is I am a very happy gal! Both these problems are fixed in the new Lightroom 3 Beta. In fact, the new print module in Lightroom 3 Beta totally rocks.
Over the next few weeks I plan to post on some of the new features in the Lightroom 3 Beta but today I just want to show off the new Custom Picture Package tool.
Get the beta!
If you haven’t used Lightroom before or if you are interested in looking at the new Lightroom 3 Beta, visit http://labs.adobe.com to download the free Lightroom 3 Beta. As always you should never trust vital stuff and day to day work to a beta version of any software – it’s there to work with and experiment with but you can’t expect it to be 100% reliable.
Ok, technical stuff out of the way, let’s get into the Print module in Lightroom 3 Beta.
Step 1
Start with a selection of images – this can be a folder of images or a collection. Click the Print module and select Custom Package. Click the Page Size button and select your printer and page size – even if you will print to a JPEG file you still need to do this – Ok, so it’s not perfect!.
Step 2
Get ready for the most exciting change to Lightroom in my book at least. Grab an image from the filmstrip and drag and drop it onto the grid. Keep the grid visible for now as it makes it easier to line everything up.
When you drag and drop the image in position, you can resize it as desired.
Step 3
If you want the container to match the image aspect ratio click the Lock to Photo Aspect Ratio checkbox. If not, deselect it and you can size the image to any dimension you like – so you can create a portrait shape image from a Landscape one, for example.
Step 4
You can now drag and drop a second image into the display and size it to any dimension.
If your image is larger than the container, hold the Control key (Command on the Mac) and drag the image inside the container to find the best position for it.

Step 5
Continue and add the images that you want into your display.
If you prefer to use fixed size containers, you can click to add specific size containers using the options in the left hand panel. You can then drag images from the filmstrip to fill them.
Step 6
To change the background color, select the Page Background Color option and choose a color to use. If you choose anything other than solid black, you’ll still see the grid lines on the screen but these won’t print and you can turn them off if they’re in the way.
Step 7
Click the Identity Plate and you can add your own identity plate as you could with other versions.
When you’re done, from the Print To options, select to print to a printer or to a JPEG File and you can then print by clicking the Print/Print to File button.
Step 8
Before you leave the module, click the + symbol to the right of the Template Browser entry on the left panel and type a name for your template so it is saved and you can reuse it again in future.
While it’s still not perfect, the Print module in Lightroom now has support for features that were not achievable with Lightroom 2 without complex workarounds and which will be appreciated by avid Lightroom users everywhere.











20 Responses to “Lightroom 3 Print Improvements” - Add Yours
November 13th, 2009 at 12:49 am
While I don’t disagree that the gui is great and far more useful and usable – I found the Jpeg export to be extremely soft even when boosted in both develop and export sharpening. Now I haven’t used the print module to actually PRINT something, I tend to send things out to a lab; but the images I see in the Beta when I do that don’t look good enough to send out.
November 13th, 2009 at 1:17 am
From what I have seen there are vast print improvements in Lightroom 3 as you pointed out with this great article.
My only problem is I do all my printing through a lab and can’t seem to find a way to export these great print layouts as JPEG files unless I maybe print as PDF then convert to jpeg in Photoshop but then I might as well just do the whole thing in Photoshop. Does anyone know an easier way to export print templates to jpeg (with a colour profile) in Lightroom on a mac?
November 13th, 2009 at 4:06 am
hy i’m from romania,please help me raise money for the “nikon AF-S 18-105 f/3.5-5.6G vr” i can not afford to buy it. I have a Nikon D40 and love to have the 18-105 on it. please help me by clicking on the ADVERTISING at http://cipriangheorghe.8k.ro/index2.html (also here is my portfolio) One click means a lot to me. THANKS
November 13th, 2009 at 5:21 am
I’m working on a wedding album now on LR3 Beta. Its going great!
November 13th, 2009 at 9:00 am
hiya – if you click on ‘print to’ under ‘print job’ you can pick jpeg file – sort out your resolution and sharpening then click on print to file – this will open a window location to save the jpeg to
November 13th, 2009 at 10:54 am
cip,
While your intentions may be genuine, asking others to click on your Google advertising links is really unethical. Each time someone clicks on a link, it costs the advertiser of that link. I’d strongly recommend you check out Google’s rules for using pay-per-click as it addresses the issue of abusing the privilege. Not saying you are, just saying–as gently as I can–that it’s not appropriate.
I do wish you the best though in your efforts to procure the lens you got your heart set on. With that said though, given the limited resources you have, don’t look past the offerings from Sigma and Tokina. They got pretty good glass for a LOT less money.
Best of luck to you!
November 13th, 2009 at 11:26 am
No offense to you Ms. Bradley, and I commend you for taking the time to write this article, but why did you pick such boring, lifeless photographs as pieces of your demo? What’s the point of being able to use the feature of a program if you can’t put it to GOOD use?
November 14th, 2009 at 9:58 am
Probably because as she said, don’t trust your best to a beta.
November 15th, 2009 at 1:53 am
Wow Lightroom really is coming on strong.
But I can’t help wondering if it’s blurring the boundaries with Photoshop?
I still can’t really see any advantage in upgrading from 1.41 except for new ACR algorithms for new camera models.
Are you guys still using Photoshop or do you think Lightroom now has enough functionality not to need it anymore?
Pat
a href=”http://www.patbweddingphotography.com/weddings/” title=”Suffolk Wedding Photography”>Suffolk Wedding Photography
November 15th, 2009 at 6:54 am
To SWP: Really?! Those local edits in LR 2.x are a life-saver! The graduated filters have fixed so many shots where I did not have enough control of the light for me, it’s worth every penny. Not going through Photoshop for that saves a lot of time and harddisk space.
November 15th, 2009 at 10:55 am
I’ll be interested in reading responses to Pat’s question. I have a friend who now uses LR for all development work on his images but not for printing. He goes to Photoshop for that. I use it to print and organize. I suspect the truth lies in that “personal preference” fog but will be interested to hear what others are thinking and doing.
December 1st, 2009 at 3:22 am
I am a new LR user and have a couple of questions from experts:
1-I saw a couple of posting on different websites about including the original image in the library so that a back will create a backup of the original images as well as the metadata and your work in LR. A few people said that LR allows you to keep the original photos inside the library internal database. In reviewing the import options of LR, I don’t see an option that let users include the original image inside the LR internal library database. This means that LR is always limited to the location of files on the file system and backup will never include everything. This creates a problem for me if I ever change the location of my files or rename the files.
2-How can I efficiently manage and organize Panorama pictures with LR?
Thanks,
December 1st, 2009 at 5:31 am
@ Behzad:
I’ve not tried LR 3beta, but:
In v2, when you imported, you specified the location of the original files. Usually, you’d import them to your computer’s hard disk (this is what I do.) There is an option you can check to backup the original files on import. It makes the most sense to back them up to an external hard drive, in case the computer crashes (this is what I do.) Backing up the catalog is a completely different thing, yet just as important. As Lightroom does not actually modify your original photos, your edits and keywords and such are saved in the catalog. LR defaults the catalog backup to somewhere on your hard disk. But this doesn’t make sense, as you’d have two copies of what could be a large file, and if your computer crashes, then you’ve still lost your catalog. I recommend backing up the catalog as well to an external (which I do daily). That way, if your computer crashes, you open up LR, and if you need to, copy the most recent backed up catalog over, have LR open that, and if any photos are missing, you can copy them over from the external, and you should be up and running.
Does this help?
December 1st, 2009 at 5:45 am
Thanks Eric.
December 9th, 2009 at 1:22 am
Helen,
Thanks for the article. Being just a hobbyist photographer with limited time I have enough on my plate keeping up with LR2, but this added printing feature will definitely be an important item that I will appreciate when the final version comes out and will likely cause me to buy the upgrade sooner then later.
December 9th, 2009 at 1:36 am
@Dawn, I am with you there.
I think sometimes upgrades have what I call “deal makers” which are improvements that are, of themselves, enough to justify upgrading and for me this is one of them.
There really hasn’t been a leading photoediting program since Jasc/Corel PaintShop pro which has offered this much control over printing. PaintShop Pro still has strengths in printing, even when weighted up against Lightroom 3, but this new feature in Lightroom is, to my mind, a feature which will make it a must have upgrade for me.
December 9th, 2009 at 4:23 am
Neet addition Helen. I wouldn’t have seen this if you hadn’t written the article.
I tried placing 5 images on a 8 x 10 sheet with a gray background which worked as advertised. However, it took a long time (3-4 minutes) to render the image. I hope Adobe can speed this up.
December 14th, 2009 at 5:28 am
Can I install Lightroom 3 Beta without it interfering with Lightroom 2? I’d like to check it out but just want to make sure they are both stand-alone and I won’t have any problems using Lightroom 2.
December 14th, 2009 at 5:30 am
Oh nevermind! I finally found the answer to that in the release notes. (Of course I find it after I posted my question here, lol) They can both be used without interference.
December 26th, 2009 at 5:53 am
Thanks for this tip!!! hold the Control key (Command on the Mac) and drag the image inside the container to find the best position for it.
Also, to compose and print a “Seamless Image” (print to image) – I find that I am unable to do this with my Page Setup configured for my HP printer – because it’s unable to print seamlessly to the edges. The solution?
Install Cute PDF! I select “Cute PDFWriter” as my printer output and now I can compose seamless 8×10 shots!
http://www.cutepdf.com/
Leave a Reply