Is Portrait Formatting always best for Portraits?
There are two main ways of holding a camera when taking an image – vertically or horizontally. These two modes are also often referred to as ‘portrait’ and ‘landscape’ formats.
These names give some indication of how people traditionally have formated portraits and landscapes – but is a vertical (or portrait) framing always best for portraits?
Today I’m going to suggest that you explore mixing it up – as part of our breaking the rules of photography series.
Faces and bodies are generally pretty elongated objects and so a vertical (portrait) framing can be quite well suited to them – however using a horizontal framing can also lead to some visually interesting shots also.
I particularly like a couple of horizontal framings when it comes to portraits:
Tightly Cropped Faces - Try zooming right in on the face of your subject in horizontal mode. In doing so you’ll probably find that you lose a little of their chin and perhaps some forehead – but it will give you a shot with a strong presence with the eyes prominently placed. You’ll also find that it leaves little room in your images for distracting backgrounds.
Head and Shoulders – One of the most effective ways of using horizontal framings in informal portraits is when you want to place your subject off center with a nice out of focus background behind them. While you can do this in a vertical formatted shot there is less room to play with.
There’s something about a horizontally formatted portrait that says ‘informality’ to me. Conversely – the vertically formatted shot can come across as a little more formal or ‘posed’. Of course there’s nothing wrong with either formal or informal portraits – but it’s worth doing some experimentation next time you’re photographing people.
Which format do you use most in your portrait photography? Experiment with some different framings next time and see what impact it might have.
This post has been updated – it was previously posted in January 2007






24 Responses to “Is Portrait Formatting always best for Portraits?” - Add Yours
January 25th, 2007 at 2:18 am
You can think of landscape formatting for portraits as the only way to frame in movies. So, if you want some ideas, go see any movie made in the last 80 years!
January 25th, 2007 at 5:19 am
Great tips, Ill be sure to keep them in mind.
On a side note, how did bikeracer get those images to be so vibrant? Is that the blurring filter you mentioned a few articles back?
January 25th, 2007 at 5:51 am
@Mike bikeracer has explained his Technique in the Technique group:
http://www.flickr.com/groups/technique/discuss/72157594364118508/
January 25th, 2007 at 7:33 am
Thank you…good article!
I like to use landscape formatting for portaits…zooming in on the face…focusing on the best feature…usually the eyes or an interesting smile. This is a very good way to capture their essence in black and white.
January 25th, 2007 at 10:34 am
great article and some amazing examples too!
January 25th, 2007 at 7:05 pm
Hey, thanks for the mention / use of my photos. I noticed a little bump in activity on them and had to go looking for the reason. Nice article too. =]
January 25th, 2007 at 9:28 pm
Julián’s remarks about movies reminds me to allways keep in mind what the photo is being used for – which can help your decision concerning landscape or portrait.
January 26th, 2007 at 1:03 am
Interesting ideas, I’m doing an assignment on portrait photography for college, so very timely for me. Thanks!
January 26th, 2007 at 2:19 am
How do you soften the photos like bikeracer did?
January 26th, 2007 at 2:20 am
never mind
May 4th, 2007 at 6:03 pm
To Dan: to blur your background you use smaller aperture like 2.8 or even 1.8, focusing only the face!
I like to experiment with portrait`s frames and I like the horizontal way too :) Nice tip! but only for the framing!
Do you think of more photographs as examples?
Biliana
May 25th, 2007 at 2:12 pm
portrait can be made with both way ( landscape and vertical) but it will look good only when you apply rule of thirds or golden rule.
Thiru-SriLanka
June 9th, 2007 at 4:07 pm
Ver nice article and very nice pics as well.
July 5th, 2007 at 6:43 am
I love your website. I will try your tip on dark tops for photographs. I typically like florals, polka dots, etc. for black and white photos. My favorite thing to do is photography my toddler in oversized hats. I can email you a photo if you’d like.
September 18th, 2007 at 10:29 am
I prefer the horizontal format for most images especially portraits. I do very much like the cinematic feel of movies and taking portraits in the “landscape” format are closer to that respect. A lot of my composition choices for portraits are made by imagining if it was a movie.
September 18th, 2007 at 5:59 pm
I really like these images. Thx for the tips! Can you share what effects you use to get this look? Love it.
September 18th, 2007 at 11:33 pm
Hi.. How to make the background out of focus, while focusing on any foregrounf objects?
September 18th, 2007 at 11:54 pm
vasanth – check out this tutorial on depth of field
October 5th, 2007 at 11:55 am
You forget to mention the square format! These are neither portrait or landscape. If anyone has any good square pics that resemple emoticons, they should submit them to this contest Norton is doing. I work with them, so I’m ineligible for the $10,000 prize. Here’s the link http://www.norton.com/photocontest
Good luck!
July 11th, 2008 at 10:35 am
Nice advice, but I believe in a portrait the eyes plays a major role. The shine and color of the eyes can out shadow the rest of the face. Another thig to condsider is the texture of the skin. The skin is not always presumed to be smooth sometime some oil and blemishes add mood to the picture.
July 12th, 2008 at 5:24 am
I recently found an article dealing with this and other portrait photography issues at
http://www.illustratedphotography.com/photography-tips/top-tips/environmental-portrait
Hope that helps too.
June 27th, 2009 at 8:56 am
I’m still pretty new to the portrait photography world, because most of the work I did before was still-life, sunsets, etc. The one thing that I am having trouble with is this:
You see both of those pictures of the girl in this tutorial?
How in the WORLD do you get them to look so real?
“Real” meaning: so smooth, so clear, so… perfect I guess you could say.
Especially in something like wedding photography. I look at so many professional photographer’s work, and there is just that “something” that makes the picture just “POP.” To be a little more… I don’t know, specific.. I mean it just feels like you are RIGHT THERE with the people in the picture.
Can anyone tell me how this is done? I’m guessing it is done in post processing, but no matter how much I fool with my photoshop, I just can’t get it to look like those…
October 30th, 2009 at 4:14 am
Loved this article. It is really useful and informative.
October 31st, 2009 at 8:20 am
Why we, as photographers, even allowed a computer software company (Microsoft) to change the names of the orientation of photograph aspect ratios, I will never know. Why did Adobe adopt the ‘portrait/landscape’ terminology rather than just us what we have been using for hundreds of years, vertical/horizontal. The entire photographic industry should protest the use of the terms as they have been applied to digital media anyway and demand that this nonsensical use of the terms be reversed.
Why should it have been harder to learn to use the normal terminology for vertical and horizontal than these new, non-accurate, improperly applied terms anyway?
The terms portrait and landscape do not even mean vertical and horizontal.
No, ‘portrait’ is not the ONLY way you can shoot a portrait with a camera AND shooting a portrait as a horizontal is not ‘breaking any rules’ because the misuse of this term should not imply that it is the orientation that a portrait of person MUST be photographed.
So make photographs of people in either VERTICAL or HORIZONTAL orientation, apply the rule of thirds if desired and find new ways to express your personal artistic style as a photographer.
Leave a Reply