How to Make a Remote Shutter Release from a Doorbell [DIY SPECIAL]
In this DIY tutorial Philip Schütz (see his Flickr account here) takes us through the process of making a wireless remote shutter release from a doorbell. NOTE: no responsibility for damage to you, your camera or doorbell will be taken by DPS: proceed with care.
Did you ever want to try wildlife shots, but the animals were scared by your presence? Did you ever want to do self portraits, but your IR remote couldn’t do the job? Real wireless remotes can help you, but they are an expensive piece of equipment. In this tutorial you will learn how to modify a wireless doorbell, that you can get in any home depot store or garage sale, to make your Canon EOS DSLR focus and release the shutter from a great distance.

Please note: I do not take any responsibility if your camera and/or you take any damage. Building the wireless control requires a bit of soldering, the soldering iron is hot and if you short?circuit parts you could destroy the doorbell. However, don’t worry if you never used a soldering iron before, if you follow the instructions carefully and handle the soldering iron with care any damage is very unlikely. You don’t have to worry about high voltages or currents, the bell and the camera use only batteries, you should avoid touching any parts anyway unless you have to.
1. What you need
- A small soldering iron (15 – 25W)
- Big tweezers or needle?nosed pliers
- Two pieces of wire, you can cut almost any piece of old wire you have
- A stereo cable with 2.5mm plug (Or a 2.5mm to 3.5mm adapter and old headphones)
- A MOC 3020 or MOC 3040 chip, ask the local electronics store, they’ll help you out
- A wireless doorbell, make sure it has an LED that is lit when the bell rings and a long melody
2. The Bell
At first you should test the bell, the LED has to light up when you press the button, and it is best if the LED stays lit for as long as you push the button on the remote. Open the bell and disconnect the speaker, you don’t want the animals be frightened by the sound, do you? Test the bell again, even if you disconnect the speaker, the LED should still light up.
Now disconnect the LED. If it has high legs, you can just cut if off near the LED, that’s the easiest way. If it is soldered directly to the board, you have to heat the solder spots on the other side of the board with your soldering iron and pull it out.
Take your MOC and look at the top, the legs facing down. There is a little marking, a small circle or a semi?circle imprinted in the case. In the photo below you can see the numbers of the pins I will refer to from now on. On the left side of the MOC between pins 1 and 2, there is a LED, similar to the one you just removed from the bell. The pins 4 and 6 on the right side of the MOC are only connected, if the LED in the left part is lit.

It gets a bit tricky now, so be careful. If you have soldered before, you can skip the following section.
Excursus: Soldering
Turn your soldering iron on and wait until it is hot. Meanwhile you take your piece of wire and remove the isolation on the one end. Now wrap the copper core of the wire around the part you want to connect it to. Put some solder on the tip of your soldering iron so it melts.
Now bring the solder onto the connection of the wire and the other part so it flows on the wire and the other part to get a good electrical connection. Repeat until the wire does not move anymore. Use the tweezers or pliers to hold the wire or the chip in place. Pull gently to test the connection.
You have to connect pins 1 and 2 to where the LED was before you cut it out. The anode must be connected to pin 1 and the cathode to pin 2, do not confuse them, it will not work the other way round. You should see which one is which from a small drawing on the board (see photo below). If there is no drawing, well then it is a bit of a guess. I suggest you only connect the wires without soldering until you know if you got it right. You can use two pieces of wire like I did, or you can connect the MOC directly to the board if you know what you are doing.

Be careful when soldering: Pins 1 and 2 and the wires on the board must not be connected in any way, don’t use too much solder.
3. The Camera
We will now work with the camera. Plug your 2.5mm cable into the cable release connector of the camera. Now cut the cable at the desired length (I suggest at least 4 inches) after the plug and remove the isolation. You should now see for separate wires, two of which are isolated again and two blank ones. Remove a piece of the second isolation as well. Make sure none of the wires are connected and turn your camera on.

One of the isolated wires connected to either of the blank ones will cause the camera to focus, the other isolated wire connected to a blank one will make the camera focus and shoot. This alone is an improvised cable release, should you ever need one. Now solder one of the blank wires to pin 6 of the MOC and the isolated wire that made the camera focus and shoot to pin *4*, or vice versa, it doesn’t matter here. You can now test it ? press the button of the remote and the camera should take a photo. If the camera focuses but does not shoot, try holding the button of the remote for some time until it does. Nothing happens? Most likely you switched anode and cathode of the LED ? fix that and it should work.
4. The Case
Put everything in the case of the doorbell, make sure nothing is connected to anything it should not be and cut a hole for the wire to the camera. I secured the cable with some tape for strain?relief.
Congratulations, you are done!




34 Responses to “How to Make a Remote Shutter Release from a Doorbell [DIY SPECIAL]” - Add Yours
June 22nd, 2009 at 2:23 am
Not to undermine the article, but the Aputure Pro Coworker remote shutter can be bought at http://www.linkdelight.com for less than $25.00. For someone like me whom never had much succes with the soldering iron, the very small extra cost is worth it.
June 22nd, 2009 at 4:36 am
hmmm…an inovative invention, but no thanks…i’ll spend $20 for a wireless remote…
not sure i want to go though all that trouble… = )
June 22nd, 2009 at 5:10 am
Wow! This is very helpful and economical solution. Thanks =)
I just have one question. What kind of cable should I use for the EOS 50D?
June 22nd, 2009 at 6:37 am
What about Nikon, does this work with their Cameras as well, or only Canon?
June 22nd, 2009 at 7:35 am
Great work Philip! Good cheap alternative to a commercial wireless remote and so simply done.
June 22nd, 2009 at 8:32 am
Glad that I was able to help you so much with this project including the interfacing to the opto-triac.
June 22nd, 2009 at 8:37 am
From what distance this remote will work ?
June 22nd, 2009 at 9:43 am
yep – you can get wireless remotes relatively cheaply – but as with most DIY projects part of the reason people like them is for the challenge of constructing something for themselves. If it’s not for you – that’s fine, but I’m sure there’s some DIY lovers out there who will be loving this one.
June 22nd, 2009 at 10:43 am
The article mentions using a 2.5mm stereo plug for connecting to the camera.
However, that will only work with the Canon 300D/350D/400D/450D/1000D cameras, as well as the Pentax K100D/K110D, *istDS/*istDS2, *istDL/*istDL2 and K10D cameras.
Canon 20D/30D/40D/50D/5D/1D cameras use the proprietary N3 connector, which cannot be purchased as a bare connector.
The cheapest option for getting an N3 connector is to buy a cheap wired remote (I bought this one) for about USD$5 or so, cut off the N3 connector for use with a DIY remote, and discard the rest of the remote.
As an alternative to making your own wireless remote using a doorbell, you can buy them cheaply. I have a number of Phottix remotes, including the Phottix Cleon II (review here), and the Phottix Plato (review here).
June 22nd, 2009 at 11:46 am
Well done but is it really worth the money/time? For nikon, just buy the Nikon wireless remote (if you have a D80, D40 etc…). On amazon is about 10-12 dollars and it work fine. It’s not like u r going to trigger ur camera from the other side of town….
June 22nd, 2009 at 12:56 pm
@alberto: if you want to trigger your camera from the other side of town, Robert Benson made a 20-mile remote using two-way radios.
His original post on it appears to be offline, but here’s a google cache version of it.
June 22nd, 2009 at 6:37 pm
@Victor W.: You are right, your help was awesome, sorry I didn’t mention it in the first place, but better late than never:
I would also recommend visiting Victor W.’s photostream and http://www.theinvertedimage.com where you can find more interesting DIY stuff by Victor W.
June 23rd, 2009 at 12:53 am
I’d rather spend my DIY time to make something else which is actually productive…
June 23rd, 2009 at 2:57 am
@alberto
Are you sure you didn’t see the IR remote? This one is more than IR, which can be only triggered from the front of the camera and to limited distances. The wireless doorbell can be triggered from all around the camera, without seeing it and from far greater distances, which depends on the doorbell. The one I used can do up to 120 metres.
I saw a wireless remote you can buy in a brochure today, which cost 49€, and it wasn’t even a Canon one.
June 23rd, 2009 at 3:49 am
as i said….r u gonna trigger ur camera from the other side of town? for what most people do the regular IR is enough…or even a wired remote. I was just posting this cuz if u pay attention some people were asking for an alternative as they own nikon cameras. It’s a good tutorial but most people would rather spend money and time on something else. i wasn’t trying to raise hell!
June 23rd, 2009 at 4:28 am
NO, Thank you, I aint no expert with that kind of stuff and I just bought me a brand new camera. I wont take the chance so I bought the remote shutter release under Aputure Pro Coworker and it works greatly. It only cost me 30 bucks. Good Luck to anyone who gonna take the risk and you lose your camera. Ya be suck if ya take the chance.
By the way, I got the Nikon D200 camera and it hasnt become popluar like they did before. I’ve took mine camera and it hasnt show any problem this far. I really love this camera so much. I dont see any problem with grainy or anything like this. Mine picture has come out purfecttttttt……
June 23rd, 2009 at 7:34 am
@alberto
I wasn’t trying to attack you, sorry if it seemed like that :) Triggering from across town is really, well, useless I agree with that. I’ve heard some people complaining that their IR only works if they hold it in front of the camera where the sensor is and can’t use it from behind (unless there is a super-reflective surface near the camera).
I can understand that it seems like a lot of cost and work to build this, but it the costs were less than 10€ (doorbell and cable from eBay, MOC from electronics store), and it took me about 2hrs to build it and I’m no expert in soldering either ;)
@reddy
You won’t lose your camera unless you place the hot soldering iron directly on it ;) Seriously, even if you short-circuit something, worst thing that can happen is that your camera keeps taking photos until you pull the plug of the remote
June 24th, 2009 at 1:42 pm
I would rather spend on a wireless remote. I am not a DIY expert.
June 25th, 2009 at 4:50 am
I think this is brilliant! I love all sorts of DIY ideas, even if I don’t actually put them to use. I personally just ordered a radio remote off ebay for $25 but it’s from China and I’m not holding out super-high hopes for the quality. If it ends up not-so-great I’ll be giving this a whirl!
June 26th, 2009 at 3:11 am
If I needed a wireless remote, I would go buy one …simple as that. What I really like about this article is the fact that it can be done…whoda thunk it? A doorbell? I guess my mind dosen’t run in those directions, but I think it’s pretty cool that other people’s do. Seems pretty creative & out of the box to me.
June 26th, 2009 at 6:21 am
Fascinating ! Something to do on a rainy day, but couldn’t you just buy a remote they are not that expensive.
June 26th, 2009 at 10:19 pm
Is not a bad idea to remote trigger the camera this way. It is running on RF, so no worry about blockage. IR on the other hand need to face the remote directly to the camera. Anything blocking in front will not work.
However, what’s the true application of this device, I’m still have no clue. Most of the time remote trigger are used to prevent camera shake during shutter movement or self portrait.
Also it is applicable for Canon Camera, what about Nikon, Sony, Pentax and Olympus ? does it worh the same ?.
June 27th, 2009 at 9:28 am
I think it’s brilliant that someone wants to take the time and effort to put together such a DIY project. Simple enough for anyone that knows the hot end of a soldering iron from the other to construct and so cheaply too. Why build one when you could just buy it? How about the satisfaction of actually putting the thing together and it works. You could set the camera up next to a bird table and push the button to grab the shot, those birds won’t be coming anywhere near whilst you’re stood there and doesn’t require an expensive telephoto either. Or how about a self portrait as you walk off into a woodland or other scenery press the button and get a shot of the most willing able and cheap model, (yourself), walking off into that scene. All without fiddling about with an IR trigger that has to be pointed at the camera and out of direct sunlight or a cheap fleabay trigger that doesn’t. Great work on the share Philip, I’m sure there’s many people that will gain the satisfaction of such a device.
July 10th, 2009 at 11:37 pm
This is great. Just what I need for pole photography!
July 11th, 2009 at 10:03 am
What is the fuction of the MOC? Thanks-
July 11th, 2009 at 10:09 pm
Any idea how can this stuff be implemented in a Kodak (EasyShare z8612 IS)?
July 12th, 2009 at 3:33 pm
@nalfonso: The MOC is an optocoupler, and it’s purpose is to ensure the two sides if the circuit are electrically isolated – ie, the electronics of the doorbell are not directly connected to the electronics of the camera, but use a optical signal.
@Ashfaq: as far as I can tell, the Kodak z8612 doesn’t have any connectivity options for an external shutter release. If you wanted to use an external shutter release, one option is to open up the case, and wire in your own socket for an external shutter release, wiring it in parallel with the camera’s shutter release button.
Alternatively, you could use a remote-control servo to physically press the camera’s shutter button. That’s how KAP (kite aerial photography) hobbyists typically remotely trigger their cameras. Google for “kap shutter release servo” for more info and photos of people’s rigs.
September 18th, 2009 at 11:16 am
There is a possum here in South Australia that comes regularly each night in the early hours to take its bread from a feeding table at my home. I would like to have an automated shutter release activated by the animal breaking an IF or similar beam.
Do you have or know of a beam-breaking system that can be allied to your wireless remote DIY?
October 4th, 2009 at 2:08 am
Hi,
Has anyone made similar device but using a movement sensor as used in home alarm systems and outdoor security lights? now that would be useful for catching wildlife shots etc
great site!
Brian
October 4th, 2009 at 12:16 pm
I have had discussions about that aspect, but the conclusion was that any movement in the vicinity of the target area could trigger the camera shutter. A beam break system can be concentrated on the area of interest more accurately.
October 10th, 2009 at 2:07 am
A great contribution.
For rest of you guys, who feel that they might damage the cam, rest assured.
On the other hand, you are here by your own choice, if you are not confident of being able to DIY, then dont build one. Your suggestions of IR based systems or other stuff available at cheaper prices are unwarranted. If you can appreciate, good, if not , go elsewhere.
October 10th, 2009 at 4:44 pm
I agree that the DIY project was a great contribution. I have made up the DIY project and it works well! In choosing a doorbell system there were several choices, the cheapest had no LED, but the next cheapest did and was quite satisfactory. I have a nocturnal possum coming to my feeding table and I have ordered a beam-break system to detect its presence and I will need to interface this to the doorbell shutter system. I think my only concern will be the width of the pulse out of the beam-break system, wide enough to trigger the doorbell sytem and hence the c amera shutter. I may have to fatten the pulse, either by increasing the RC time constant or interfacing an intermediate pulse width conversion.
October 11th, 2009 at 1:59 am
Hello . i’m from Romania .
What about triggering a flashgun with that metode.
How fast is ? i’m worry about sincronization time 1/60minimum.
thx!
January 1st, 2010 at 5:28 am
Very good idea, i myself am hacking a wireless door bell, but to send bit streams, and information :) i could very much use one of these as i’m trying to become a sports photographer, this would be handy to take photos of myself whyle riding, snowboarding etc.
Leave a Reply