How to Choose a DSLR Camera
DSLR Cameras are increasingly becoming a type of camera that is in the reach of the average photographer as prices fall and as manufacturers develop more user friendly models.
I’ve previously discussed some of the advantages and disadvantages of moving from a point and shoot to DSLR but in this post would like to explore how to choose a DSLR.
In doing so I’ll cover:
1. 9 Reasons to Upgrade to a DSLR Camera
2. 8 Factors to Consider when Choosing a DSLR
3. My DSLR Camera Recommendations (also check out this post on the Top DSLR Models As voted by our Readers)
Firstly, a quick recap on some of the reasons why you might want to upgrade to a DSLR.
Reasons to Upgrade to a DSLR Camera
- Image Quality - Due to the larger size of image sensors in DSLRs which allows for larger pixel sizes - DSLRs are generally able to be used at a faster ISO which will lead to faster shutter speeds and less grain (ie shoot at 1600 ISO on most DSLRs will have less noise than shooting at 1600 on a Point and Shoot). DSLRs also have built in noise-reduction when genearating JPG images which also helps cut down on noise.
- Adaptability - DSLR’s ability to change lenses opens up a world of possibilities for photographers. While my point and shoot has a nice little 3x Optical Zoom (and many these days have longer ones) my DSLR can be fitted with many high quality lenses ranging from wide angle to super long focal lengths depending upon what I’m photographing (and of course my budget). Add to this a large range of other accessories (flashes, filters etc) and a DSLR can be adapted to many different situations. It should be noted that when it comes to lenses that the diversity in quality of lenses is great. Image quality is impacted greatly by the quality of the lens you use.
- Speed - DSLR’s are generally pretty fast pieces of machinery when it comes to things like start up, focusing and shutter lag.
- Optical Viewfinder - due to the reflex mirror DSLR’s are very much a what you see is what you get operation.
- Large ISO range - this varies between cameras but generally DSLRs offer a wide array of ISO settings which lends itself to their flexibility in shooting in different conditions.
- Manual Controls - while many point and shoots come with the ability to shoot in manual mode, a DSLR is designed in such a way that it is assumed that the photographer using it will want to control their own settings. While they do come with good auto modes the manual controls are generally built in in such a way that they are at the photographers finger tips as they are shooting.
- Retaining Value - some argue that a DSLR will hold it’s value longer than a point and shoot. There is probably some truth in this. DSLR models do not get updated quite as often as point and shoot models (which can be updated twice a year at times). The other factor in favor of DSLRs is that the lenses you buy for them are compatible with other camera bodies if you do choose to upgrade later on (as long as you stay with your brand). This means your investment in lenses is not a waste over the years.
- Depth of Field - one of the things I love about my DSLR is the versatility that it gives me in many areas, especially depth of field. I guess this is really an extension of it’s manual controls and ability to use a variety of lenses but a DSLR can give you depth of field that puts everything from forground to background in focus through to nice blurry backgrounds.
- Quality Optics - I hesitate to add this point as there is a large degree of difference in quality between DSLR lenses but in general the lenses that you’ll find on a DSLR are superior to a point and shoot camera. DSLR lenses are larger (more glass can add to the quality) and many of them have many hours of time put into their manufacture (especially when you get into higher end lenses). I strongly advice DSLR buyers to buy the best quality lenses that they can afford. It it’s the difference between a high end lens on a medium range camera or a medium range lens on a high end camera I’d go for quality lenses every time as they add so much to photos.
Before I tackle how to buy a DSLR keep in mind that DSLRs are not for everyone. I’ve written more on the down sides of DSLRs in a post previously which you might find helpful in deciding whether you should stick with a point and shoot or upgrade.
Get Free Weekly Digital Camera Tips via our Newsletter
How to Decide Which DSLR Camera is for You?
So how do you decide which DSLR to buy? There are an increasing array of them on the market so you have a real choice ahead of you.
Here are a few factors to consider when looking for a DSLR:
1. Price - a good place to start when thinking about buying a DSLR is obviously price. DSLRs price range in price from some quite affordable deals at the lower end to extremely high prices at the professional end. Set yourself a budget for your purchase early on but make sure that you keep in mind that you’ll need to consider other costs of owning one including:
- Lenses (some deals offer ‘kit lenses’ but you should consider upgrading - see below for more on this)
- Batteries (all models will come with one but if you are travelling you might need a spare)
- Memory Cards (some models come with one but most are inadequate in terms of size. Even if you’re lucky enough to have one included you’ll probably want to upgrade to at least a 1 gigabyte card).
- Camera Bag (some dealers will throw one in - but once again don’t expect a high quality ‘free’ bag. Your DSLR is something worth protecting - invest in a good bag)
- Filters (at the least you’ll want to get a UV filter for each lens you purchase - but you might also want to consider other types down the track also).
- Extended Warrantees (there’s a variety of opinions on whether they’re good or not - but they’re worth considering)
2. What will You use it For? - when you head into a camera store to purchase any type of question the first thing most sales people will ask you what type of photography you want to do. It is well worth asking yourself this question up front as it will help you think through the type of features and accessories you’ll need.
Will this be a general purpose camera for recording ‘life’? Are you wanting to travel with the camera? Is it for sports photography? Macro Photography? Low Light Photography? Make a realistic list of the type of photography you will use it for (note I said ‘realistic’ - it’s easy to dream of all kinds of things you’ll photograph - but in reality most of us only do half what we think we will).
3. Size - DSLRs are all more sizeable than compact point and shoot cameras but there is a fair bit of variation in size between them also. Some photographers don’t mind carrying around weighty gear but if you’re going to use it for on the go photography (travel, bushwalking etc) then small and light models can be very handy.
4. Previous Gear - the attractive thing about DSLRs is that in many cases they are compatible with some of the gear you might already have.
- This is particularly the case for lenses. The chances are that if you have a film SLR that your lenses might well be compatible with a DSLR made by the same manufacturer. Don’t assume that all lenses will be compatible (particularly older gear) but it’s well worth asking the question as it could save you considerable money.
- If you have a point and shoot camera you might also want to look at the type of memory card that it takes as some models of DSLRs could also be compatible with them. This probably won’t be a major consideration as memory cards are considerably cheaper than they used to be but it could be a factor to consider.
5. Resolution - ‘how many megapixels does it have’ is a question that is often one of the first to be asked about a new camera. While I think ‘megapixels’ are sometimes over emphasised (more is not always best) it is a question to consider as DSLRs come with a wide range of megapixel ratings. Megapixels come into play as you consider how you’ll use your images. If you’re looking to print enlargements then more can be good - if you’re just going to print in small sizes or use them for e-mailing friends then it’s not so crucial.
6. Sensor Size - Another related question to consider is how big the image sensor is. The term ‘crop factor’ comes up when you talk about image sensor size - I’ll upack this further in a future article as it’s perhaps a little complicated for the scope of this one. In general a larger sensor has some advantages over a smaller one (although there are costs too). But I’ll unpack this in a future post (stay tuned).
7. Future Upgrades - will you be in a position to upgrade your camera again in the foreseeable future? While entry level DSLRs are attractively priced they tend to date more quickly than higher end models and you run the risk of growing out of them as your expertise grows and you thirst for more professional features. Ask yourself some questions about your current level of expertise in photography and whether you’re the type of person who learns how to master something and then wants to go to a higher model that gives you more control and features. It’s a difficult question but you might find it’s worthwhile to pay a little more in the short term for a model that you can grow into.
8. Other Features
Most DSLRs have a large array of features that will probably overwhelm and confuse you at first as you compare them with one another. All have basic features like the ability to use aperture and shutter priority, auto or manual focus etc but there’s also a lot of variation in what is or isn’t offered. Here are some of the more common features that you might want to consider:
- Burst Mode - the ability to shoot a burst of images quickly by just holding down the shutter release - great for sports and action photography. DSLRs vary both in the number of frames that they can shoot per second as well as how many images they can shoot in a single burst.
- Maximum Shutter Speed - most DSLRs will have a decent range of speeds available to you but some will have some pretty impressive top speeds which will be very useful if you’re into sports or action photography.
- ISO Ratings - Similarly, most DSLRs will offer a good range of ISO settings but some take it to the next level which is useful in low light photography.
- LCD Size - It’s amazing how much difference half an inch can make when viewing images on your cameras LCD. I noticed this recently when testing a camera with a 2.5 inch screen after using my own 1.8 inch one. While it might not change the way you shoot photos (people tend to use viewfinders at this level to frame shots) it certainly can be nice to view your shots on a larger screen.
- Anti Shake - in the past few weeks a range of new DSLRs have been announced by manufacturers in the lead up to the Christmas rush. One of the features that is featuring more and more in them is anti shake technology. While it’s been common to get ‘image stabilisation’ technology in lenses the idea of it being built into camera bodies is something that is attractive.
- Dust Protection - another feature that has started appearing in the latest round of cameras is image sensor dust protection (and in some cases self cleaning for image sensors) - something that will help alleviate a lot of frustration that many DSLR photographers have. To this point this is a feature that is mainly on lower end DSLRs but it’s bound to appear on new professional models also.
- Connectivity - Getting photos out of your DSLR and into a computer or printer generally happens these days via USB but some people like FireWire and/or Wireless.
- Semi-Auto Modes - As with point and shoot cameras - many DSLRs (especially lower end ones) come with an array of shooting modes. These generally include ‘portrait’, ’sports’, ‘night’ etc. If you rely upon these modes on your point and shoot you may well use them on your DSLR too. Higher end DSLRs often don’t have them.
- Flash - Generally professional grade DSLRs don’t offer built in flash and just have a hotshoe while entry level DSLRs include a built in flash.
Which DSLR camera is right for you?
At the time of writing this post there are a large range of DSLRs currently on the market (with a fresh batch of them set to be announced in the new year).
I’m a Canon user so my recommendations will reflect this below. Here are three that you might like to consider.
Canon EOS 400D (Digital Rebel XTi) - I had the opportunity to play with this camera last week for a day and while I was a little skeptical at first as it’s fairly much an entry level DSLR I came away from testing it quite impressed. It has a 10.1 megapixel sensor, 2.5 inch LCD and all the features you’ll need to switch into manual (and semi manual) modes.
It is a camera with a lighter feel than the 30D (below) which will leave some feeling as though it might be a little light on - however this adds to it’s portability.
This is a good camera if you’re a little nervous about stepping out of point and shoot land and want something that is easy to use. Compare prices on the Canon EOS 400D from around the web.
Canon EOS 30D - if there’s one DSLR that I’ve recommended more than any other it is the 30D. I’ve owned it’s predecessor for a few years now (the 20D) and have loved it but the 30D has a few nice extra features that make it worth the upgrade.
The 30D is has an 8.2 megapixel sensor and nice large 2.5 inch LCD as well as an array of other features that give you plenty of opportunity to explore your photographic ability (as well as a good Auto mode for when you hand it over to a digital camera novice). This is a more serious camera than the 400D (it’s more solid in your hands too) but it is very user friendly also.
It is positioned nicely between the entry level and Professional models going around and produces wonderful images. Compare prices on the Canon EOS 30D from around the web.
Canon EOS 5D - this camera will be out of reach of most of us (although I’m saving up) but I wanted to include it as it’s the best camera I’ve had the privilege of testing so far (in fact I’ve had it for the last 3 weeks and I just don’t want to send it back).
The 5D is not at the very top of the Canon DSLR range but it is not cheap and is aimed at the higher end amateur digital photographer who knows what they are doing. It doesn’t have a built in flash and there are no semi-auto modes on the dial (at this level you wouldn’t need them). It has a 12.8MP full frame sensor, 2.5 inch LCD, weighty magnesium body and a list of features longer than my arm.
This camera has great reviews from around the web and is high on my own personal wish list. Compare prices on the Canon EOS 5D from around the web.
Of course there are more options than just Canon DSLRs.
While I’ve not extensively tested them I have friends with the Nikon D200 and the Nikon D70s who are more than satisfied with their cameras also. Nikon’s DSLRs get highly recommended in reviews around the web and you’ll not go wrong in going with them either.
Feel free to add your own recommendations below in comments. As I say - I’m a Canon guy and am pretty much won over by the quality of camera that they make (their image sensors go beyond what I’ve seen in other cameras) however there are many more great DSLRs out there (particularly from Nikon) and I’d love to include the recommendations of others - simply leave a comment below with your own recommendation and I’ll include some of them in the main post as an update over the next day or two.
Update: A few readers have asked me for recommendations for DSLR lenses via email after reading this post. You might like to start with some introductory posts that I’ve written on the topic at:
If you found this post helpful you might also like to subscribe to our free weekly Digital Photography Tips Newsletter.


92 Responses to “How to Choose a DSLR Camera”
October 31st, 2006 at 7:06 pm
Another great options for “entry level” DSLR are Nikon D80 and Sony A-100. D80 has a great big viewfinder and you can also get a good kit lens in the range 18-135mm. A-100 has an advantage of good price and nice small size.
October 31st, 2006 at 7:52 pm
In June this year I made the move from a point and shoot to a DSLR. I chose a Canon 350d, as I knew several people who owned it, liked it and recommended it to me.
I got it from Jessops (in the UK) as instead of the standard kit lens, you got a USM lens with it.
At first I was happy in automatic mode, as my pictures were looking far better, but now I’m starting to move more and more into manual mode to achieve what I want. My main frustration before was poor performance in low-light conditions, something which isn’t a problem now.
This website has helped me so much in learning how to use it - keep up the good work!
Thanks
October 31st, 2006 at 11:34 pm
I was told that most dSLRs do *not* come with memory cards, and my limited experience confirms this. (This is in contrast to point #1 under the “How to decide which dSLR is for you”.)
November 1st, 2006 at 8:52 am
EC its not that they don’t come with the memory cards its the style that card is. Canon uses compact flash (CF) and Nikon used SD. If you already have a CF card for your point and shoot then you might consider going with Canon instead of Nikon to reuse your memory cards.
November 1st, 2006 at 9:01 am
None of the DSLR’s have a memory card included, unless it’s a package deal and those are not usually offered by the manufacturer, but by retailers. Most DSLR’s do have onboard memory which can vary from manufacturer to model. If you should decide on moving to a DSLR, keep in mind, the higher the resolution of images you want to capture, the larger the memory card you want to get and afford.
November 1st, 2006 at 9:40 am
Thanks for talking so much about the canons that we already know about. How about something about the new sony dslr based on the konica/minolta.
November 1st, 2006 at 9:49 am
I would stress that the live preview mode is not available on (most) DSLR’s and it may quite be a make or break thing for many people….
November 1st, 2006 at 9:52 am
Josh - I’d love to talk about Sony and Konica/Minolta’s cameras - but unfortunately canon are the only company who has made cameras available to me to review at this point (I’ve asked plenty of other manufacturers - but to this point my sites with 30,000 daily readers apparently are not big enough to get that type of attention).
So - unless someone else who owns one wants to review some other cameras for me I’ll have to leave it with Canon.
As the post above says a couple of times - feel free to leave comments with your own experiences/recommendations.
November 1st, 2006 at 10:29 am
I purchased a Konica/Minolta Maxxum 5D about a year ago (just before they got out of the market); this way my first (D)SLR and I am quite pleased with it so far, though I haven’t been able to use it as much as I would like to have. From a newbie perspective, my buying decision was influenced by:
* in-the-body anti-shake; which meant I would have to spend less on lens to get image stabilization
* user friendly controls and display; I espically liked how the camera senses your eye at the viewfinder and turns off the display screen
* competitively priced (at the time) against the Canon Rebel XT; though I am a loyal to Canon for my point-and-shooters, the 5D was just priced too sweet.
Though I was never really worried about availability of lens or service\parts for the 5D, I was never-the-less really happy to learn that Sony would continue to build on the KM platform.
I’ll try and post a ‘my impressions’ sometime soon on my blog though I don’t think I have nearly enough expertise or experience to post a full fledged review.
November 1st, 2006 at 11:15 am
An ok article I guess.
But why so Canon biased?
There are others out there!!
November 1st, 2006 at 11:17 am
Thanks Raj - appreciate your mini review of your camera.
Rick (camera-news.com) - if you read through to the end and the comments above you’d see why it’s Canon biased and that you’re welcome to help bring some balance to it :-)
November 1st, 2006 at 11:24 am
I love my rebel xti except….how small it is in my hands. I didn’t think a bulkier camera was worth the extra bucks and put that money towards better glass.
It is more compact though.
November 1st, 2006 at 12:19 pm
I will be buying the Kiss Digital X, the Japanese branded XTi/400D, in Seoul soon. Check out my blog as I’ll be posting about my purchase.
November 1st, 2006 at 12:38 pm
Thanks for the excellent information. I’d suggest that anyone looking to buy one visit a real hands-on camera store where they can play with a few models. I’d also suggest that they look at the pros, and cons, of each model, and see what fits, their hands, their shooting style, and their budget.
I shoot for a paper in the Atlanta area, and I switched to Pentax when Minolta left the ballgame. I would have stayed with Sony, but their customer service left something to be desired. I was about to buy a Nikon when I got a chance to play with a Pentax K100d, and loved it. I now shoot with it on a daily basis, and love the thing.
Pros, for me, are: Low cost-at 550 bucks for a body,if it gets torn up, I’m not out an arm and a leg; Lens compatability-it’ll use virtually every Pentax lens made in the last 30+ years. I’ve got a GREAT 135mm prime that I use for portraits that I picked up on ebay for twenty bucks!; and, Anti-shake, which really works.
The only real cons, for me, would be a few less “buttons” than I’d like-menus can be a pain, and a lack of dust sealing. This is why I’m getting a Pentax K10d as soon as I can. 10 megapixel, dust sealed, anti shake, full lens compatability, for less than a grand-I’m there.
November 1st, 2006 at 12:42 pm
> Bill said: If you already have a CF card for your point and shoot then
> you might consider going with Canon instead of Nikon to reuse your memory cards.
This is a terrible reason to choose one DSLR camera over another. You can get a 1 GB SD card for $20 and a 2GB for $35 now in 2006 (and they’ll only get cheaper). Memory cards are the least of your worrys and inexpensive compared to the purchase of a DSLR.
You should decide based on your wallet and on what the camera offers as far as features and usability. Does it have enough low light capability for you? Which one do you feel comfortable with? How does the camera feel? Too heavy? Too light? Do you like how the buttons are laid out? How easy is it to use? Does everything seem to make sense to you when using the camera? Does it work well with your computer? Is there a good warranty on it? What type of lenses are available for it? Do any of your friends have a similar camera with accessories they might lend you (lenses, flash, etc) Sure, memory cards can be in that decision somewhere, but very, very low on the list. They’ll be the cheapest thing you’ll ever buy for it!
November 1st, 2006 at 12:43 pm
P.S. I have a Nikon D50 and really like it. Great starter DSLR!
November 1st, 2006 at 1:20 pm
I shoot Nikon 35mm and DSLR. Just to make a point about a previous post. Only the D80 uses SD all the others Nikon DSLR use CF. And my 2 cents. You can’t go wrong with ether Nikon or Canon. Happy shooting.
November 1st, 2006 at 2:13 pm
Wish i could afford to upgrade.. I’m stuck with a Nikon D50 (w/ SB-600 speedlight), but hey it does the job. Most of my pic’s are for web purposes anyway so the size and quality of the pics are fine.
November 1st, 2006 at 3:12 pm
I would like to put in a reccomendation for the upcoming Sigma SD-14 (due out in a month or so). It has a really different kind of sensor than all the other DSLRs, and as such has a “look” to the photos that some very much like - wait for samples from the camera to appear to see for yourself. I currently shoot a Sigma SD-10 which has the same kind of sensor and it has been fantastic.
On a side note, in response to looking at a camera that uses CF cards just because you have some already - I agree that’s not a great reason (though some people have largish CF cards already even for P&S cameras). A better reason is that there are many interesting devices built for pros and serious amatures that use a CF card primarily - such as portable image storage devices, or readers like the new Sandisk Extreme reader with a really fast read rate. Some of those devices have adaptors to also let you use SD, but it’s a but more of a hassle - and personally I find the CF form factor to be about the perfect size for durability and portability. Some of the SD cards I would not want to have in a pocket without a case but I have no such fears with CF cards, which are generally thicker.
November 1st, 2006 at 5:02 pm
Although I’m a big Canon fan, Nikon also has great dSLRs - they are the two companies that you can be guaranteed quality.
I don’t see why many people would need live preview. If you’re still relying on the point-and-shoot lcd then you shouldn’t be upgrading to a dSLR. Also, if you’re buying a dSLR to take pictures of your kids, don’t buy a ridiculously expensive one, a rebel xti or a d80 will work perfectly fine. If anything, spend your money on a good lens. Start with a medium-priced zoom lens and maybe a couple quality primes and then once you know exactly what you want and how you’re going to like a heavy glass zoom, buy it.
November 1st, 2006 at 5:04 pm
another thing. GO TO THE STORE and hold the camera in your hands. The most important feature of a camera is comfort - otherwise you’re never going to want to use it.
and for pete’s sake, if its a camera store ask them some questions and buy the camera from the store, don’t use them and then buy it online because its twenty bucks cheaper.
November 1st, 2006 at 6:46 pm
@Ryan
For many digital point-and-shoots, the only way to see what you’re shooting is the LCD.
November 1st, 2006 at 7:45 pm
Why on earth do you talk about DSLR cameras and being better at shooting JPEG?
If you are gonna buy DSLR then you should shoot RAW as it has 65,536 shades of each colour, compared to JPEGs 256. RAW is way more forgiving on badly lit shots because of this, and is also lossless compression.
November 1st, 2006 at 7:55 pm
This post is the best I’ve seen so far about the differences between point and shoot and DSLR cameras and the main features to look for in choosing a good DSLR Camera.
Thanks a lot
November 1st, 2006 at 11:59 pm
I’ve noticed no one has mentioned any Olympus models. I’m currently contemplating between a Nikon D50 or 80 and the Olympus Evolt 500 - any thoughts on the major differences? It’s been advised to me to stick with the big three - Canon, Olympus or Nikon - as all their technology isn’t spread about among other items - it’s cameras and photography only…
November 2nd, 2006 at 12:11 am
Thanks for the great information! This couldn’t have come at a better time. My wife and I are having a baby in January and I am looking to get a camera to shoot ‘life’ - to take pictures of our new arrival, friends, and family.
November 2nd, 2006 at 1:03 am
I use an Olympus E-500. It is an entry-level DSLR that has met my needs quite well. It offered the most competitive deal at the time I purchased it. It also received high reviews from web sites such as dpreview and stevesdigicams.
I think there is a pretty simple question that one might ask themselves that would help most determine what DSLR they purchase (or even if they decide to purchase a DSLR at all): Do you plan to make money from your photos?
If you honestly can say that you will be making a living off of your photography then you owe it to yourself to invest in a system that offers depth, such as Canon or Nikon. You would be investing in a system that will grow with your career.
For me I had to modestly accept that we will never be a photographer for National Geographic or Sports Illustrated. I will likely never make a living off my photos. That being the case I was more willing to try a system with far less depth than Canon or Nikon.
In return I got a good-performing camera with two good lenses and saved money too.
November 2nd, 2006 at 1:06 am
What about Pentax? Pentax optics have been quoted as being the “poor man’s”Leica.
November 2nd, 2006 at 1:23 am
I have one addition– EBAY. I bought my EOS 20D last year and got a deal on the body + 6GB card that was less than the body alone at Best Buy.
November 2nd, 2006 at 2:32 am
You should try Nikon, I am a proud owner of D70s, and would like to own D200! It really rocks! 400D is ladies camera, too small to mans hand.
November 2nd, 2006 at 2:59 am
I am kind of upset you didn’t even mention Pentax. I noticed another guy picked up the k100D, and I actually did the same not too long ago. The anti-shake really works, I can have the shutter open for 1/2 on 18mm without any blur at all. Doesn’t work the same when attaching my 300mm lens, but it is still nice. Also the K10 is coming out November, with I think a couple others. I love the menu system that the Pentax has as well as how comfortable it feels, which I am surprised you didn’t mention at all. How it feels is very important when shooting a lot of pictures. I do like the list minus the point I pointed out though.
November 2nd, 2006 at 3:58 am
I have a Nikon D50 with its two “kit” lenses. I love the camera, and it takes wonderful pictures. I last owned a Canon AE-1 that still takes great pictures on film. A couple of issues…
.. The Nikon “kit” lenses are wonderful, but they “break” at 55mm, so I have to change lenses when I need to pass over that break point. I’d prefer an 18-300 or so lense so I’d have one lense for all occasions. I hesitate to buy one, though, because the automation on these lenses is very specific and key to the camera’s performance.
.. Buy a professional flash. The onboard flash on the D-50 is a serious limitation. The SB-600 I bought is like opening up a whole new camera. It illuminated a house 200 yards away at midnight! It adjusts its flash duration in the thousanths of a second — in real time!
Thanks for your article!
November 2nd, 2006 at 4:04 am
@Phillip: “Only the D80 uses SD all the others Nikon DSLR use CF.”
Correction there, D50 uses SD card
November 2nd, 2006 at 5:11 am
I’ll second the recommendation for pentax. The controls are easy to use, and they’re the DSLR that most closely matches shooting with a film SLR for me. Add in the fact that the K series can use any pentax lens ever made and you have a winning combination.
Also, Terry, I don’t know where you get the idea that JPEG is limited to 256 colors. The only reason to shoot RAW is when you think you might have to change the white balance, and that can be fixed by learning how to properly set the WB on your camera. Otherwise, the only thing RAW gets you is larger file sizes and slower camera operation. I shoot JPG in most situations, and only RAW when I’m not sure how the WB will come out. RAW just adds processing time that could be spent moving on to the next step in your workflow.
November 2nd, 2006 at 6:54 am
Great post! I’ve got point-and-shoot and have been toying with the idea of a DSLR for a while. How much of a step down is the Nikon D50 from the D70/D80 and the EOS30D?
November 2nd, 2006 at 9:09 am
Darren, thanks for the great post. I expounded upon it on my own blog:
http://www.photocritique.us/2006/10/31/graduate-from-the-world-of-point-and-shoot-photography-go-dslr/
I decided to give it a little Nikon bias too. ;)
November 2nd, 2006 at 9:22 am
Does anyone know if lenses that fit my Canon T-70 will fit (for instance) the XTi? I have a couple of point and shoot cameras, but would like the flexibility of using other lenses and the SLR capability.
November 3rd, 2006 at 11:55 am
To Zach - RAW is inherently way superior to JPEG, JPEG is a lossy compression and the image results of a CR2 file imported through Photoshop vs a JPG is a no brainer, the CR2 file image is head and shoulders above the JPEG. As a professional I shoot every paying clients images in RAW, it gives the highest quality end image and print.
Great site by the way - I would tend to include the name of the parallel Nikon model to each of the Canons you recommend - none of the other manufacturers have a wide range (entry to pro) also I was surprised you didn’t have any mention of the Fuji FinePix S3 which is very well respected amongst professional portrait photographers
November 3rd, 2006 at 1:19 pm
Thanks for this post and thanks for the info about Canon. It makes me feel good that I bought a great product. Im new also in DSLRs and bought 350D just 2 months ago. I really like it and just bought additional CF card.
November 3rd, 2006 at 1:34 pm
@Terry - you are incorrect in stating that jpegs are limited to 256 colors. they are not. it is the gif image format that is limited to 256 colors because gifs use an 8-bit palette. jpgs use 8 bits per color or 24 bit color. the gif image format is not supported by digital cameras of any stripe. also, RAW files may or may not be compressed depending on the manufacturer because they are proprietary. raw image files are typically two or three times the size of jpegs.
November 3rd, 2006 at 10:14 pm
Olympus E500 recently purchased with 2 lens kit and 2GB CF card. Absolutley love it! Still learning all the things it will do and am amazed at what it can do. I have 20 year background with 35mm SLR and these new DSLRs are very impressive. Most are fairly equal in features, so price played a good bit into my decision on the Olympus, which was purchased online after much reading and asking questions of sales folks and pro photogs.
November 4th, 2006 at 1:14 am
Great site for the novice - I cant get enough of my Sony A100’s capabilities - keep it up
November 4th, 2006 at 7:13 am
I just moved up to my first DSLR this year from a Minolta DiMage Z3. I went for the Nikon D50 on (a) price, (b) comparative simplicity, (c) versatility (lots of accessories and lenses), (d) it uses SD cards of which I already have about a ton, and (e) ’cause I loved my little bitty Nikon Coolpix 5600 which now lives in my briefcase 24/7.
November 4th, 2006 at 8:56 am
I purchased the new Sony A100 a few weeks ago and I couldn’t be happier. I had the Sony DSC-V1 and had purchased a Nkon D70 when I wanted to go to DSLR. The Nikon was too heavy for me to hold and my pictures were blurry from camera shake. The A100 has a Steady Shot feature. I took some action photos at my granddaughter’s soccer game; her mother published them in a team newsletter and I basked in the positive comments about the pictures that I overheard at the next game!
Please, do you have some instruction on Depth of Field, especially with a zoom lens that goes to 300?
November 5th, 2006 at 3:39 am
Excellent article. I’m currently contemplating upgrading from a SLR-like model to a DSLR. As my knowledge of the manual-settings is pretty poor this blog really helps me improve, I am interested in what people think of other cameras beyond Canon/Nikon mostly because I have read so many good reviews of these I would like to find out more about their rivals (such as someone above mentions the Olympus model and I previously owned a nice olympus film-camera).
I know that the “digital camera review’ site does a good job but more sources of reliable reviews would be excellent (or ideally as mentioned more reviews on this site!!)
November 5th, 2006 at 10:32 pm
@Beasman - The Canon T series cameras all used FD mount lenses. The 400D (XTi) uses EF mount like all Canon EOS cameras. So no, the older FD lenses from the T70 won’t fit on the 400D.
I believe with enough mucking about you can get adapters etc to make them fit, but they’re not very user-friendly at that point, you pretty much need to do manual metering and lose a lot of the functionality of your digital camera.
I’m planning on buying a 400D myself and have looked into this as I have a few FD lenses from a T50 lying around.
November 8th, 2006 at 1:02 pm
David - Thanks for the info. That’s what I was afraid of.
November 27th, 2006 at 4:17 am
Ahm, if I would write such an article I’d would see to have testes most of the DSLRs. The best entry DSLR atm is defintely the Nikon D40 which offers most of the professional stuff and the price is simply the best.
December 14th, 2006 at 9:01 am
I’ve been shooting SLR for years. Started with a pentax ME (great camera btw even 20 years later) and have recently upgraded to a Nikon D70s.
People think that the more they spend on a camera, the better their images will turn out. I can get a better image with my 20+ year old Pentax than the moron beside me who bought a 5D and couldn’t caputure the broad side of a barn. Just because you have a fancy camera, doesn’t mean you will shoot better!
No he has an expensive camera that came with one lense, and after he pays it off in 3 years, he might be able to save up enough money for the L lense that ‘must be the problem’ as to why his images look like crap.
Anybody can stick a camera on auto and shoot something, it doesn’t mean your images are going to WOW people.
January 6th, 2007 at 2:58 am
just found your site and love it! thanks!
my two cents: i’m upgrading from a point and shoot to a dslr and had a lot of preconceived notions (on paper) of what i wanted. i mean, i reasearched to death. for me, it was between the canon rebel xti and the d40. but after dragging my butt out to the actual camera store, boy did my opinion change.
the nikons, in the end, weren’t for me ergonomically or for my projected use, but after looking at the xti, it was initially comfortable, but the grip was so small (and i have small hands!), my hand felt miserable after handling it for only 15 mins or so.
then i held the 30D. all became right with the world. and someone then pointed out the control wheel (vs. menu buttons), and i was sold. sure, i’m going to pay a lot more, but the ergonomics and the step up to the control wheel are going to be worth it when i go out to shoot.
it’s def a camera i can grow in to.
bottom line, no matter what the brand (like a few others have already mentioned): GO HOLD THE CAMERA and talk to people! it pays off!
January 16th, 2007 at 12:07 pm
Love your site,plan to upgrade from my Canon S3 IS this year and a practical DSLR is what i am researching . I have been looking at the Pentax K10D for its built quality,weather sealing,in body image stabilization,lens cleaning technology, front and rear mode dial to name a few.The camera comes with a better than comp.kit lens and a sub $1000 price tab.Good value worth a look. Do love the Canon 30D i think Canon has the better cmos sensor better low light performance, much better in terms of built and shutter than the 400D.Canons rule the road when it comes to image quality,better processor in terms of out of the camera JPEGS , they all produce similar RAW results.Weather sealing which i think is very important, moisture and dust don’t do well with such fine tools, and should be top on feature when choosing a DSLR . Good work Pentax, if the 30D had weather seals i would pay the extra ?
January 16th, 2007 at 3:43 pm
I bought the Nikon D50 after looking at a whole bunch of cameras. Its a great entry level camera and very well priced when compared to the Canon’s. However it does not have some features and ISO settings that the more expensive cameras have. But to be honest most of the time when taking good pictures it comes down to the user and the lens. If both are good you’ll get good photos regardless of how fancy the camera is.
February 16th, 2007 at 5:39 am
i want to buy nikon d200 that made buy japan
how much is it?
March 27th, 2007 at 2:24 am
How about Olympus 4/3rds is the photo quality as good comparably priced Nikon/Canon?
May 12th, 2007 at 12:30 pm
Just wanted to say that Nikon cameras do USE CF cards because I own one. Someone mentioned earlier that Nikon uses SD cards…true but not for all models.
May 20th, 2007 at 3:45 am
Any opinions on the newer Panasonic FZ50 or similar Leica V Lux?
May 30th, 2007 at 1:51 am
pls mine is qiet different. All i need is a complete manual for panasonic FZ50 and canon EOS 5D. pls i will ap[reciate it if it is send to my mail box as soon as possible. thanks.
June 11th, 2007 at 1:47 am
i want the manual of dsr 400 digital camera i will apriate it if you send it to my box as soon as possible . thanks
July 27th, 2007 at 5:54 am
Just an opinion, but I think it’s probably best just to skip over the “entry level” slr and go for one that you can grow with. In my own experience, I bought a Pentax ZX-30, and sold it a year later because it just didn’t do what I wanted it to do. I ended up buying a Nikon F80, which is a great film camera.
If you really want to learn to take good pictures, buy an old, completely manual 35mm slr, because it will force you to learn how to take a picture.
I now use a D200, which I think is an incredible camera. Beware, it is big and heavy. The main reason I wanted it is because very little is hidden in menus. All the controls are at your fingertips, which is great because I have learned to use things that I never would have if they were buried in menus.
In the Nikon range, skip the D40. It’s probably a great camera, and I don’t have any experience with it, but for almost any reason you would want a DSLR, you need the D80 for it to make a difference.
Same goes for any “entry level” camera: you will only be entry level for a few months at best. Look into a Pentax K10D or Canon D30 if Nikon doesn’t suit you.
August 2nd, 2007 at 12:18 pm
Hi there I came about this website from Google search. It’s been helpfull so far, as I now know abit more about what I’m looking for in my new purchase! I was wanting to buy a Canon or Nikon, as I’ve been told they’re both good brands. I had the Nikon D40 (6.1 mgp)in mind (or the Nikon D40X which is 10 mgp, but it IS alittle more expensive so I’m still thinking). I was wondering what you think about the Nikon D40 for a first digital SLR, I do want something to challenge me, and something to grow into. I read that the pixel size isn’t a huge deal if you’re just using the photos for everyday. I do hope to enlarge other photos, at some point… is a 6.1 mgp good enough for that? I want something that I can change the shutter speeds/and settings… or leave it on auto when I need to. Thanks for you advice!
August 29th, 2007 at 4:15 pm
The Nikon D40/D40x is a great starter camera and will meet most expectations of a novice. The only downside to the D40 series is that it can only use AF-S lenses, meaning that it has no AF (auto focus) in-body.
Nikon has many AF-S lenses that will allow a new dSLR user to grow into the camera, however, if you want a really good prime, macro, or wide angle lens then you’ll have to get the Nikon D80 instead.
The Nikon D80 is a little more expensive, but the in-body AF will allow you to use any Nikon lens. Because of this, the Nion D80 will allow you to use it until you feel ready to get a professional dSLR- like the Nikon D2Xs or D3.
For indepth reviews on the Nikon cameras, use these links:
Nikon D40
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond40/
Nikon D40x
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond40x/
Nikon D80
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond80/
FYI: I’ve been doing research for about 4 months now and I decided on the Nikon D40. Mainly because of price and the kit lens is much better then that of Canon’s. I plan to build a lens collection over the next few years and then move to something similar to the Nikon D300. As many photographers have told me, its better to get a good body and then invest in more expensive lenses.
This is a great Nikon D40 starter package:
http://www.abesofmaine.com/item.do?item=NKD402LK
Good luck!!
September 13th, 2007 at 8:51 am
Thanks for your input James. Last month I did buy the D40 and I’m having a blast with it. My budget only allowed me to get the one lens package deal, but I’m going to save/ask for a lens or two for Xmas! It’s fun exploring the photographic “eye”. I realize now too just how many premature winkles I have at 29 yrs old!!!! Good close ups on this camera, I’ll have to invest in some anit-wrinkle cream now too! LOL I wish I could’ve bought a more expensive/ better camera, but I must say I am pleased with this one and I know I can grow with this one, and buy more accessories with this D40, for awhile yet. I bought a UV filter and carrying case for it right away. and borrowed a tripod… so I have the basics for now. Good luck to you too. Happy picture taking!
November 21st, 2007 at 1:53 pm
Which one is better Nikon D70 or Nikon D40 ( I dont know which one came out first).
Canon vs Nikon? which one is better?
December 14th, 2007 at 10:35 am
Can anyone help that which DSLR camera should I buy for sports photography??? entry level type please
January 18th, 2008 at 3:07 pm
I’m about to buy one new DSLR.which one will be better for panoramic shots, pls?wide angle lense?
advise leh plssssss!
January 21st, 2008 at 12:44 pm
I’ve done some research and for me, the D40 clearly came out on top(for the lower end of DSLRs). Great picture quality(read the reviews and see the sample pics, please); great portability(it’s only a bit bigger than the large point n’ shoots with the kit lens); great build and feel(find a store and hold a demo like I did). I haven’t received mine yet ’cause I’m too lazy to go go downstairs to get mine from the mail box, but from the results I saw at the electronic store where I fooled with it and downloaded the pics to my own card, it’s damn great!
Also, if you plan on a 55-200mm VR lens upgrade, I strongly recommend Cameta Camera. They sold the D40 with kit lens plus that lens as a bundle for 659.99+18 shipping.
They sell on both Amazon and Ebay and have been a brick n’ mortar store in NY for quite a while now. Incredibly fast shipping. I had mine shipped to DC and it took 2 days to process and 1 afternoon to ship. Incredible.
I also got a 50mm AF 1.8D nikkor. The lens is quite cheap, around 110 more or less. It won’t focus on the D40, but I think I’ll fair fine with manual F.
Going to get me camera now ;)
March 5th, 2008 at 9:52 am
And what about new Sony A350? Anyone have any sugestions? LIve view and titlting screen seem very encouraging for potential amateur buyers - like me, but still, didn’t hear any opinion on any Sony.
March 19th, 2008 at 12:45 am
what’s the best for starters (especially if your thinking about the price, too)?
i would really appreciate your suggestions..
June 29th, 2008 at 7:59 am
SDLRs with a flipout and or rotate LCDs other than Sony
July 14th, 2008 at 3:41 am
I recently bought the nikon d300 from here http://www.squidoo.com/the_best_dslr_camera and I’m really satisfied. It’s my first dslr camera and my photos are amazing, infact I’m thinking of enetering a local photo competition with it =)
July 23rd, 2008 at 3:52 am
I have a Nikon d70 w/ 50mm lens. It was my first d-camera, got it slightly used from a friend a year ago. And I love it, took it to the race track, yes with the small lens, the 200 miles@hour looks like they are standing still! Why go for shoot&point when you can get pics like that? Snapshots are crystal clear,awesome detail! And when I compare the quailty w my friends point&shoot I WIN!! And also I was confused with a prof.photographer at race track with my d70 and gain acess to pit area! AWESOME!!
August 24th, 2008 at 12:56 pm
I used to have an old pentax 34mm from the 70’s..it was great till it was stolen by the badgage handlers at the airport (always carry on)I have used several point and shoot’s. I want to get back into a slr, I miss the great pic’s it took.
My budget is on the lower side but I am seriously thinking of merging from life pics for fun and working into a new carrer, If photography will work for me what starter or lower mid range camera would allow me to merge into the pro or semi-pro, photographer status. I agree that the camera doesn’t make photographer but I want quality pic’s that a low budget wedding,or other event would be happy with,without spending a fortune like I did at my wedding. Any ideas?
September 22nd, 2008 at 2:51 am
It’s a great article, Well written and informative. Will definitely help in my next purchase to upgrade my current 3 mega pixel dinosaur.
November 7th, 2008 at 5:32 am
Great artical but I am still at a loss. I have had a point and shoot for about a year now I have got to the point where most of the time I can trick it into doing what I want but I have a fasination with Macro and wildlife meaning I need a telephoto lens and a Macro lens. I am also do portraits, which lens is good for that? So I guess my question is what lenses are right for me? I am at a toss up between the Canon EOS 30D and the Nikon 40D.
December 4th, 2008 at 1:30 pm
I’m thinking of getting my first DSLR and I happend to find this reccommendation site on google ^^
any inputs on the Canon D450?
December 4th, 2008 at 1:36 pm
sorry, I mean 450D
December 5th, 2008 at 11:45 pm
is the Canon EOS 1000D a good camera and is it good enough for its price?
December 30th, 2008 at 9:08 pm
Very interesting and helpful article. Thanks for sharing it. I recently bought a Nikon D90 from here http://www.squidoo.com/cheap_nikon_cameras I’m still new at it but it seems to meet all the requirements needed to be a great camera. Can’t wait to discover her full potential =)
January 2nd, 2009 at 5:31 pm
Hi,
I need your help. I am very interested in still photography. I own a Sont DSC H-9. In fact , I believe I take very ordinary pictures. Can you look at my orkut or flickr profile, and suggest me those changes, which can improve my photos, from ordinary to a somthing better.
My flickr link is as below:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/22231203@N05/
My Orkut link is as below :
http://www.orkut.com/Main#AlbumList.aspx?rl=ms
January 14th, 2009 at 4:34 am
what is better canon 1000d or nikon d60 for first time dslr??
January 16th, 2009 at 12:13 pm
I would recommend the Sony A300. It has live view, super steady shot, and many other features that make it an awesome DSLR for a beginner who want good quality pictures/
January 20th, 2009 at 5:28 am
hi daren.i am student and intersted in photodraphy.i am studying media science.i want to become a film director.photography in the form of cinema is a very essential part as i think.so recently i have joined photography course.i want to buy a camera.my budget is 25-40thousand.please recomend me the best.have a nice day.waiting for ur reply.
January 21st, 2009 at 6:04 pm
hi dear
i have a sony dslr alpha 350 camera.what about your openion for that camera
February 7th, 2009 at 6:52 am
I think it’s pretty shocking that you, in an informative thread, then proceed to fail to be balanced in camera reccomendation.
IMO you should have done some research on cameras before reccomending models. You don’t even mention possible competing models which wouldn’t take long to do ( just post the competing model and maybe a link to a review ).
Pentax (I am pretty die hard Pentax), sony and Olympus all provide alternatives. I believe the olympus sensors are not too hot so I’d be tentative to reccomend them but Sony and Pentax provide very good viable alternatives. Pentax usually proving to be solid workhorses with excellent build quality ( usually better than others in the same price bracket) and top quality sensors or Sony who have lighter builds but more features ( and probably slightly worse image quality ).
March 18th, 2009 at 2:00 am
Does sony A-200 is quite a good one for an entry level D-SLR??I’m just a beginner in photography.. And eager to learn it..
April 5th, 2009 at 9:55 pm
@Katier:
Darren’s recommendations are perfectly reasonable given that Canon and Nikon represent the vast majority of the DSLR market. Sony (nee Konica Minolta) and Olympus are small players now (how the mighty have fallen!). And forget about Pentax, they’re not even trying any more! While the K20D is not a bad camera, Pentax have no high end or professional models.
For April, 2009, I would recommend the following Canon models to most readers: 500D/T1i, 40D (or 50D), 5D Mark II. I’m slightly leery of the 50D because most reviews say its image quality is not as good as the 40D’s.
I would also recommend the following Nikon models: D90, D300, D700.
Olympus have excellent models in the E-420, E-520, E-620, and E-30. The E-3 is getting rather dated, but it’s still a fine camera, especially for the low price. But image quality wise, Olympus falls behind Canon and Nikon.
I just bought a 40D (with 17-85mm) at the bargain price of CAD$1,180 and I’m very happy with it.
April 24th, 2009 at 5:18 pm
I am wanting to purchase a new dSLR. I have searched and had just about decided on the Canon D450, until
someone showed me the Olympus E620. I was very impressed. Haven’t been able to find out a review on the
use of one, only a review as per manufacturers remarks.
Has anyone used one, or are there reasons why the Olympus brand is not as popular, and or, will the E620
make the Olympus much more popular. Budget wise it is a good price and with the Art Filters already built in,
it saves on costs again.
Love to hear some comments.
May 14th, 2009 at 2:50 pm
Top article on DSLR Camera. Your article is in-depth and clearly structure. Really helps me alot
May 24th, 2009 at 9:08 pm
I’ve been ploanning to get a Nikon d60. This will be my first dslr. But I could hardly find “D60″ on above comments. Isn’t it that good?
May 25th, 2009 at 10:32 am
@Prajwal
the D60 isn’t a ‘bad’ camera however as Nikon is a premium brand.. for them to produce a budget camera such as the D60 means they cut corners. This even carries on through their crop sensor range. Any of their crop sensor cameras will be more expensive than similarly specced cameras from other brands.
Canon has a similar ‘problem’. Not so bad as Nikon but they are still generally pricier due to being a ‘known’ name.
Pentax is the best value for money brand. Their budget cameras ( the K-m/k2000 and k200D ) are superb, best value for money, very well made cameras. The mid range camera (K20D) is superb value for money and again very very well made. The new K-7 promises to continue this trend and would appear to be as good as any crop sensor camera available from any manufacturer.
Sony have some excellent cameras. They tend to be more feature packed, but less well built than Pentax’s. They use the old Minolta mount so have a respectible range ( although not as good as Pentax or Nikon - both of whom have the biggest ranges, Pentax probably shading it ) and like Pentax use in body image stabilisation (means any lens has IS).
So overall the D60 is popular due to it being ‘a nikon’ but it is hamstrung and not the best buy.
June 2nd, 2009 at 2:01 pm
DSLR’s are beter equipped to handle UV now than old film cams so UV is less or not at all
neccessary . what do you think og the D60 vs g10 powershot ?
June 15th, 2009 at 11:17 am
How about Cannon EOS 1000D with EFS 18-55 Kit ? It’s cheaper what ?! I’m thinking of buy it ? Can someone proceed some opinion ?
Leave a Reply