|
||||
|
Pretty nice shot!
A shallower DOF would have allowed a faster shutter speed to freeze a bit more of the motion blur from vibration (I would think you'd need to be around 1/200). it's notable at either end of the car and the driver's head. The shallower DOF would have put the fence more OOF and still require panning. You don't have to pan to obscure an obstruction..you just have to focus "thru" it and keep it out of the DOF.
__________________
Steve the Photographic Academy.com My Portfolio, My Flickr, My Blog D4, D7000, G10, 1030SW and a bunch of other stuff.... |
|
|||
|
Thanks for the feedback sk66.
I tried many shots with a wider aperture but the fence became very visible because of the relatively faster shutter speed. I understand what you are saying about DOF but I couldn't find a better combination of aperture and shutter speed. I think maybe this was because the fence was about half way between me and the car? I understand things would've been easier if I had been right up close to the fence but I was restricted to my seat. Would a different ISO setting have helped at all? |
|
|||
|
Quote:
I think a lower ISO would have helped as you could have kept the same shutter shutter speed and shot at a wider aperture to throw the fence out of focus even more. You may find this post, on this forum, of interest. Panning: Motor sport
__________________
Flickr stream. http://www.flickr.com/photos/34094515@N00/ 500pics stream http://500px.com/Richard_Taylor |
|
||||
|
Here's an example of one I shot thru the fence. I would say the fence was 50yds from me and the bike about 70yds so the fence was closer to the bike than me.
My settings had a wider aperture and faster shutter speed and it worked quite well. The only "evidence" of the fence is the support cable. Part of the difference might have been panning speed as the bikes were doing close to 200mph and at that distance they went by QUICK. The longer focal length also contributes for shallower DOF (for a given focal distance). I think to get to a wide aperture in that situation you would have needed a CPL or ND as well as "low" on the ISO. ![]() Exposure 0.008 sec (1/125) Aperture f/6 Focal Length 195 mm ISO Speed 200 Exposure Bias -1/3 EV
__________________
Steve the Photographic Academy.com My Portfolio, My Flickr, My Blog D4, D7000, G10, 1030SW and a bunch of other stuff.... |
|
|||
|
Thanks both of you for your feedback. It's certainly given me some things to think about for next time.
Very nice shot of the bike sk66. I reckon I was a similar distance from the car as you were to the bike. They were probably going around 150mph, a difference which may have been significant. Interesting too about the focal length effect on DOF - I hadn't considered that one! Thanks again. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.
This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.
Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:
For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!
To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.
Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter: