#1 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2009, 02:33 PM
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Romania
Posts: 11
Post grainy blurry peer

Hi guys,

This is a shot that I tried to process with Photoshop. I, personally, like the blurry grainy look ... What do you think? Should I have done something different with the shot?

blury grainy peer

Camera: Nikon D40
Exposure: 0.002 sec (1/500)
Aperture: f/5.6
Focal Length: 72 mm
ISO: 220
Exposure Bias: 0 EV
__________________
_________________________________

Roxana

Nikon D40 | Nikon AF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G II DX | Nikon AF-S 55-200mm f/4-5.6 G ED DX VR
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2009, 06:00 PM
GothamCity's Avatar
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 90
Default

I love grainy looks, but I'm not so sure about the blurry. I can kind of see the tiny rails and the blur makes it look a little too busy to me. I think I would've liked to see the rails a little more clearly, especially since the water and sky are a bit flat, the picture just feels blurry and cloudy without enough detail, but I'm not a proffesional so I don't know
__________________
=] constructive criticism and reposting on DPS only welcome!!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2009, 08:18 PM
Trader's Avatar
dPS +1000 Club
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 1,091
Default

I have to agree that the blurring (or camera shake) doesn't improve this image. I would also crop out a some of the solid blue sky on the top of the image, it does not add any quality.
__________________

flickr

Nikon D300; Nikkor 50mm f/1.4D, Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G, Nikkor 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G, Nikkor 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G, Nikkor 300mm f/2.8G ED AF-S VR IF, Tamron 18-270mm f/3.5-6.3, Nikon AF-STC-20Eii 2.0x Teleconverter and 2 SB-900s with reflectors, light stands, LumiQuest Softbox iii, & umbrellas.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2009, 08:26 PM
Japaslavian's Avatar
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 660
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trader View Post
I would also crop out a some of the solid blue sky on the top of the image, it does not add any quality.

I would actually say the exact opposite.
The gradient created by the fog is really nice, and having a little more negative space would really help balance out the image.

As for my opinion of what you could do next time...
I think many photographers think that they need to get the entire subject into the frame, instead of making the best of what is available. I would try something like this:

(excuse the poor clone job, but it gets the point across).

Gives if a little more atmosphere and mood, as opposed to something that is more documentary.
__________________
7 d | g l a s s | n e u t r a l d e n s i t y | l i g h t | p e r c e p t i o n


Last edited by Japaslavian; 05-12-2009 at 08:32 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-13-2009, 07:00 AM
kencaleno's Avatar
dPS +1000 Club
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2,189
Default

Why no tripod?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-13-2009, 11:40 AM
fletch's Avatar
dPS +1000 Club
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sheffield, England
Posts: 2,000
Default

I'm gonna add my voice to the "hold it steady" brigade.

The tranquil minimal scene is suited perfectly to the erie gradient in the fog and mininal muted colours. The busy/blury pier ruins that. If it had been pin sharp I'm sure you would have had a really good shot. How come its so blury given the 1/500 shutter speed you used. Is it a PP trick?
__________________
Fletch

<< blog >> - flickr
Olympus E510 - Ok to edit and re-post on DPS only
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-13-2009, 12:21 PM
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Romania
Posts: 11
Default

I have proccesed the photo ... and yes... it is blurry because I applyed some blur to it. Here is the original photo ...

seeside peer

I wanted to create a dream kind of image ... and that's why I tried to blur it ...
__________________
_________________________________

Roxana

Nikon D40 | Nikon AF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G II DX | Nikon AF-S 55-200mm f/4-5.6 G ED DX VR
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-13-2009, 02:00 PM
fletch's Avatar
dPS +1000 Club
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sheffield, England
Posts: 2,000
Default

Do what you did before but instead of bluring the pier, sharpen it. I think it will look great. (If you can share your work flow so we can all learn from what you did)
__________________
Fletch

<< blog >> - flickr
Olympus E510 - Ok to edit and re-post on DPS only
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0