Close
Close
  1. #1
    lorganne's Avatar
    lorganne is offline I'm new here!
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    29

    Default Too much processing?

    So, I kind of did things backwards. Before I got into photography, I was really into image editing (Photoshop CS2+ to begin with, I've recently become obsessed with Lightroom). I got into photography through my image editing. I've seen people here who take beautiful natural unedited photos, so this is my question. Is this photo too heavily edited? I'm worried that I'm getting too into post-processing, maybe that my photos are looking too over-done? I'm kind of new to photography, so I just want to know if I need to tone it down a bit, or should I just go wild, or does it even matter? If you were a customer, would you pay for a photo this processed? I'm not sure if it's a good thing, a bad thing, or just a me thing.

    But of course, not all of my photos are so heavily processed, and I do try my best to take great photos without processing.



    Canon 60D
    f/1.8
    1/100s
    125 ISO
    50mm
    Edited in Lightroom 3

    Sorry for writing a novel!
    Facebook | DeviantArt |
    Canon EOS 60D | EF-S 18-135mm f/5.6 IS / EF-S 55-250mm f/5.6 IS II / EF 50mm f/1.8 II

  2. #2
    JFSanders's Avatar
    JFSanders is offline Someone else guy
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    De Land Florida
    Posts
    1,581

    Default

    It is your art and as such there is no right and wrong. Would it sell? For every seller there is a buyer. But you may never meet! If you were Andy Warhol this would sell. If you were Jim Sanders your mother would not even post it on the fridge... So that is a subjective thing and not really answerable.

    It is a nice image in that it is interesting but it isn't engaging or compelling. It doesn't tell a story so to speak. The shadows are mixed and uneven which hurts the composition which is meh. Being dead center in the image really doesn't hurt but doesn't help it either.

    I like the fact that you are on an adventure of discovery and I am sure that you will find many fascinating things to photograph and process in your artistic vision. That is a good thing.

    jim
    Nikon D40, D90, Fuji Finepix S5100, Mamiya RB67,


  3. #3
    lorganne's Avatar
    lorganne is offline I'm new here!
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    29

    Default

    Thank you so much for your help! As far as composition goes, that seems to be my weak point, so your critique really helps!
    Facebook | DeviantArt |
    Canon EOS 60D | EF-S 18-135mm f/5.6 IS / EF-S 55-250mm f/5.6 IS II / EF 50mm f/1.8 II

  4. #4
    TrevorKThomas's Avatar
    TrevorKThomas is offline TrevorKThomas
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Charlottesville, Virginia, US
    Posts
    524

    Default

    I like it. You'd think the strawberry was metallic the way the lights reflecting off it with that silvery appearance.
    flickr
    Sony SLT-A55; 75-300mm; 18-70mm; nifty fifty 1.8; Photoshop CS5 Extended, Lightroom 4

  5. #5
    happyaperture7's Avatar
    happyaperture7 is offline dPS Forum Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Planet Earth
    Posts
    50

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JFSanders View Post
    The shadows are mixed and uneven
    Yeah, I'd have to agree. They're uneven enough that they were distracting me from the photo.

    Other than that, I have to say I like it. I'm a big fan of high key, and over-processed photos. Good for you maintaining an open, ready-to-learn attitude; you'll go far with your photography.

    Best of luck!
    ~Laurie
    In love with light!
    Nikon D3100, 18-55mm f3.5-5 VR ED kit, 55-200mm f4-5 VR, 50mm f1.8, PSE 9, Lightroom 3
    Flickr | Blog

  6. #6
    AmazingGrace0385's Avatar
    AmazingGrace0385 is offline Amazing Grace Photography
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    30

    Default

    Where I see over-editing as more of an issue is on portraits. I think this image looks neat the way it is edited. Editing is going to vary by image - and like a PP stated, the answer is subjective.
    Canon Rebel t1i, Tamron 17-50mm f2.8, Canon 50mm f1.8, Tamron 70-200mm f2.8, Nissin df622 Mark II External Flash
    My Photography

    My Business
    My Equipment List

  7. #7
    The LoKW is offline dPS Forum Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    276

    Default

    Guilty as charged here too. I am new to digital processing and there have been MANY times that I have processed an image, thought that it looked good and then choked on my coffee the next morning when I saw it after eight hours of sleep.

    I think this image is good. I do wish that the harsher secondary shadow was not there as it's distracting. Love the texture on the strawberry that was enhanced by your processing. Not sure that the image stands on its own based on the current composition but I find it interesting to look at and think that you're on to something.

    TFS!

    Kevin

  8. #8
    FireDawg's Avatar
    FireDawg is offline Trouble maker since 1979
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Mount Holly New Jersey
    Posts
    283

    Default

    I am going to go against the grain with my comment but please dont take it as being negative. I am not a huge fan of the B&W. I don't think it does anything for this shot. To me when I see a strawberry (especially alone) I automatically expect to see vibrant green and red. I think that would have looked better on a plain white background. The secondary shadow is also very distracting.

    I am by no means a professional though and am just sharing my views as a casual viewer.
    Canon Rebel T1I, 50mm 1.8, 55-250, 15-85, 430 EX II
    Flickr

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Log in

Log in