|
||||
|
Hi everybody, I wanted your thoughts on this HDR image:
1. Does the overall processing work? I already see a few blown highlights. 2. Does the composition work, with the large mossy stone in the foreground? 3. Any other words of wisdom you might have. Thanks in advance for your thoughts/suggestions/questions. You can see a larger version here. If you're interested, this little creek is located in Oregon's Columbia River Gorge, at about milepost 55 on I-84, easily within walking distance of the parking area there. ![]() No EXIF data, as it was combined with 3 shots at -2, 0, and +2 EV.
__________________
Photoblog Subscribe here! Flickr 500px In landscape photography, when you shoot is more important than where you shoot. |
|
||||
|
That's a beautiful shot Rick! I love the subtle HDR. I'm thinking no one has offered a critique because it's such a great shot! I do see a little blown out area in the right side of the water, but nothing that bad. I've never heard of anyone having to shoot +3/-3 to capture the entire range of the image. That rock in the foreground works well and also matches the color of the background.
Did you use a ND filter or polarizer?
__________________
GREG - Canon XS with 18-55 kit flickr flickriver My 500px "You can't be young forever, but you can always be immature." - Larry Andersen. |
|
||||
|
Thanks Krusty. I used a CP filter, actually, and at -2, 0, +2. I could have probably even done a +3 or even +4 to get more detail in the rock shadows. I was doing some experimenting in Photomatix and was able to achieve this effect. Also, I had just got my filter earlier that morning, so I'd probably adjust it a little differently if I shot that creek under the same conditions. As it is, it was pretty dark out, in between rain showers, and on the shady side of the gorge.
__________________
Photoblog Subscribe here! Flickr 500px In landscape photography, when you shoot is more important than where you shoot. |
|
||||
|
Nice shot.
IMO, the vibrance of the red/greens is a bit much and the large rock in the foreground tends to "anchor" the eyes preventing appreciation of the rest of the image. I'd desaturate/lower vibrance some and crop the foreground..
__________________
Steve the Photographic Academy.com My Portfolio, My Flickr, My Blog D4, D7000, G10, 1030SW and a bunch of other stuff.... |
|
||||
|
Points well taken, sk66. I kept going back and forth wondering whether or not the comp would work with the rock all the way up there. Also, the hdr work was probably a little over the top, but I really liked how the leaves make themselves known throughout the image. Believe it or not, I did desaturate those colors before posting. :-) Thanks for adding your thoughts.
__________________
Photoblog Subscribe here! Flickr 500px In landscape photography, when you shoot is more important than where you shoot. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.
This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.
Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:
For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!
To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.
Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter: