|
||||
|
What software are you using? Why do you want to save JPEGs as TIFFs? (If you don't have a specific reason... it's probably unnecessary).
TIFFs are a funny format. There are many variations. Most variations on the TIFF format are lossless (i.e. you don't lose any information from the image). As you probably know, JPEGs are lossy (you do lose information), however that lost information is chosen very carefully so that the human eye basically can't see it. Overall, I either store my images in a lossless format which I can use for editing (I use gimp, so I save in its XCF format -- but Photoshop's PSD is similar), or else I store them as JPEGs for the final project. I have never noticed an actual loss of quality when saving a file as a 90% quality JPEG, and I make large-sized prints from them all of the time.
__________________
David Clark Photography, project 365 photo blog, flickr. It is OK to edit and repost my photos on the DPS forums only. |
|
||||
|
The rule of thumb for file formats is that if you're not done editing, you need to save in a lossless format: TIFF, PSD, XCF. Once you have saved something in JPEG, there is no benefit in converting it to TIFF, the compression damage has been done. Another thing to keep in mind is JPEG is only 8 Bit, if you have an HDR you're planning on printing on a wide gamut printer, you should save in a 16 Bit Tiff, TIFF is the closest thing to a High Bit-Depth Standardized format we've got.
Andrew Rodgers Perfected Perspectives -- Photography by Andrew Rodgers | Andrew Rodgers (acedrew) on Twitter
__________________
Canon 50D 24mm, 50mm, 100-400mm, 28-135mm Panasonic Lumix TZ-3 Yeah, I have optical image stabilization and a 10X lens, it also fits in my pocket. http://perfectedperspectives.com Twitter |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
As some will tell you, saving and re-saving images as jpegs will cause them to degrade in quality, but I still have never been able to see any difference. I personally print 16x20's from jpegs, and have never noticed any artifacts. You are much more likely to notice sensor dust and water spots on your lens, before you notice jpeg compression artifacts.
__________________
David Clark Photography, project 365 photo blog, flickr. It is OK to edit and repost my photos on the DPS forums only. |
|
||||
|
If the tiff file was created from the jpg, absolutely not. Compressing a file to create a jpg means throwing out some of the information within the file. That is why they are smaller in MB size. Once that info is gone, it's gone for good. So when you create a tiff file from a jpg, even though the size may be bigger, it can't possibly be any better in quality. If the tiff file was created from a RAW file, it would absolutely be better in quality because it is a lossless file. Is it enough to see a difference? That's debatable.
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.
This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.
Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:
For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!
To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.
Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter: