#1 (permalink)  
Old 08-17-2010, 11:41 PM
dlhartman's Avatar
Crazy, but efficient.
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 45
Default Why I don't use Photoshop

Really? You don't use Photoshop? Really. I love photography. I love composition and I’m kind of a nut about shallow depth of field. I even favor overexposure for effect. I just think that whatever can be done in camera should be done in camera. I try to keep things clean and simple and I think that Photoshop has an insane tendency to hinder that. It’s like having 300+ channels on your TV - the more you have, the more you watch. Editing holds the same principal. You can do some awesome things with an image and add all sorts of cool effects but just like TV, the more you can do, the more you’re likely to do. You can easily wind up with an image that is so over processed you forgot what you loved about it to begin with. Instead, your eye is drawn to the various actions and layers.

So, what do I use? Being the owner of a Canon 40D I make good use of the software that came with my camera. I do most of my editing (which is minimal and usually just consists of basics like bumping up the contrast, sharpening the edges or converting to b&w) in Canon’s Digital Photo Professional. It’s easy to learn, easy to use and still produces the results my clients expect. Will it salvage an image with poor composition? No, learn your photography basics first. If I want a little something extra, a film effect or some texture I use a program called Photoscape that you can download for free. With it you can also create pages, combine images, add a watermark and a host of other things.

Some people might call my process complicated but I wouldn’t agree. This is also one of the many ways (along with using free hosting from Wix for my website) I’m able to keep my overhead expenses low and therefore, keep my fees HIGHLY affordable. Affordability is something else I’m passionate about but that’s a separate post all together!

Comparision
__________________
Specializing in woman's portraiture, I shoot with a Canon EOS 40D, 85mm and 50mm primes.

Website | Blog | Facebook | Flickr

Last edited by dlhartman; 08-17-2010 at 11:46 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-18-2010, 12:24 AM
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: s
Posts: 242
Default

Photoshop is a really powerful tool. You should really check it out.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-18-2010, 12:38 AM
SusanH1970's Avatar
Am I in trouble again?
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Connecticut, USA
Posts: 9,171
Default

I have DPP too, but it can't fix skin tones and color casts.
__________________
Susan
Mostly Canon stuff
My Flickr
Facebook - new photos always posted and always happy for new "likes"!
Website going through an overhaul!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-18-2010, 03:03 AM
Japaslavian's Avatar
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 660
Default

Your argument seems very situational. I've been using PS forever, and maybe use 10 functions on a regular basis at most. I generally spend no more than 10 minutes on a image, so just because I make can everything pink and purple doesn't mean I do. That being said, I use those 10 functions because they essentially give me an unlimited amount of control. There is no shame in altering images to an extent. I would argue that most reasonable PS edits could have been done in the darkroom, from contrast, to brightness, to sharpening, and color adjustments, so what's the difference between doing them in a darkroom than on a computer other than saving time and losing your elitist-cred?

I do encourage people with little photography experience to stay away from PS for the exact reasons you've pointed out, but once you understand photography I see no reason for limiting yourself with inferior software, especially for professional practice. Yeah, PS is expensive, but there's a good reason for it. How would you like to spend years and years of time programming algorithms that work on a single pixel level, to just give it away for free for professionals to make millions with?

You may not like it now, but I feel like that given some time, you'll see the light...

or suffer silently.
__________________
7 d | g l a s s | n e u t r a l d e n s i t y | l i g h t | p e r c e p t i o n

Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08-18-2010, 04:11 AM
zona5101's Avatar
Molon Labe
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 7,063
Default

PHOTOSHOP:
before:

After:



disclaimer: random images found on internet.
__________________
They call me Bruce
www.brucebphotography.wordpress.com
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 08-18-2010, 04:14 AM
JohnT's Avatar
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Dublin California
Posts: 468
Default

I think a person should use a program they are comfortable with and it should not take college courses to understand it, whether it is Lightroom, Photoshop, Elements8, Paintshop Pro, PhotoImpact, Gimp Paintnet, etc.
Many folks are hobbyists and to pay $600.00 for a editing program even if it is the best is beyond the means of many and is not practical. If a person is a pro of course it makes sense and it is tax deductable. I rather spend that kind of money on a lens than software. Those that are not selling their work but learning for self improvement should find a happy medium. .
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 08-18-2010, 04:52 AM
LeeR's Avatar
Professional Wanderer
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Gainesville, Florida
Posts: 1,611
Default

Getting good at photography is about learning to see photographically and that takes years of practice. If the tools you are using now are working for you, then you are probably where you need to be. However, the day may come when you will feel hindered by these same tools and want to experiment with the rather amazing array of tools Photoshop has to offer.
I came from a film background where getting it right in the camera was essential. No amount of darkroom wizardry could salvage a poorly exposed image, though there were some rather remarkable things that could be done in the darkroom if you did have a good image. I now see Photoshop as the darkroom of the digital age. You are right; it's far more important to master the camera side of things first, but trust me when I tell you that when you are ready for it, there are some fabulous things you can do in PS.
__________________
Lee R
http://lucentbydesign.blogspot.com//
The real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes but in having new eyes.
-Marcel Proust
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 08-18-2010, 05:43 AM
dlhartman's Avatar
Crazy, but efficient.
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 45
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SusanH1970 View Post
I have DPP too, but it can't fix skin tones and color casts.
Photoscape can correct color casts!
__________________
Specializing in woman's portraiture, I shoot with a Canon EOS 40D, 85mm and 50mm primes.

Website | Blog | Facebook | Flickr
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 08-18-2010, 05:47 AM
dlhartman's Avatar
Crazy, but efficient.
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 45
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LeeR View Post
Getting good at photography is about learning to see photographically and that takes years of practice. If the tools you are using now are working for you, then you are probably where you need to be. However, the day may come when you will feel hindered by these same tools and want to experiment with the rather amazing array of tools Photoshop has to offer.
I came from a film background where getting it right in the camera was essential. No amount of darkroom wizardry could salvage a poorly exposed image, though there were some rather remarkable things that could be done in the darkroom if you did have a good image. I now see Photoshop as the darkroom of the digital age. You are right; it's far more important to master the camera side of things first, but trust me when I tell you that when you are ready for it, there are some fabulous things you can do in PS.
Thank you, I agree. I'm just not there yet.
__________________
Specializing in woman's portraiture, I shoot with a Canon EOS 40D, 85mm and 50mm primes.

Website | Blog | Facebook | Flickr
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 08-18-2010, 08:24 PM
candleman's Avatar
Bad at explaining
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Auckland , New Zealand
Posts: 5,919
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zona5101 View Post
PHOTOSHOP:
before:

After:



disclaimer: random images found on internet.
hahaha.........
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0