#1 (permalink)  
Old 04-22-2009, 06:25 PM
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 192
Default Why are my further distance pictures not sharp?

I would like some help in pointing out to me why my images that are shot from a longer distance are not sharp like I would like. It seems that photos I take that are shot from 10' or greater distant are not very sharp. I'm wondering if it is the lens or my camera settings.

If I capture a nice tight, closeup photo, I can zoom in close on the photo and it is nice and clear, crisp. But once I start getting some distance between me and the subject the sharpness starts going away.


I added two photos. The first not being sharp as I would like and the second nice and sharp. The difference is focal length, aperture and iso speed. At first, I thought the ISO speed was causing it, but the second one has higher ISO and is sharper.

The second one is a diffferent lens - 55-250mm but the same issue with this lens further distance I get.

I captured the first photo with my kit lens 18-55mm lens. I should have been focused on the bride or at least I thought I did.

Just hoping someong can shead some light why the difference and help me improve the longer distance shots.

Thanks

20090418_0215

Camera: Canon EOS Digital Rebel XSi
Exposure: 0.017 sec (1/60)
Aperture: f/4.5
Focal Length: 34 mm
ISO Speed: 400
Exposure Bias: 0 EV
Flash: On


20090418_0047-edited

Camera: Canon EOS Digital Rebel XSi
Exposure: 0.017 sec (1/60)
Aperture: f/5.0
Focal Length: 96 mm
ISO Speed: 800
Exposure Bias: 0 EV
Flash: On
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-22-2009, 06:32 PM
OsmosisStudios's Avatar
Don't Panic
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Mississauga / Ottawa
Posts: 11,358
Default

Where, exactly, do you see a lack of sharpness?

To be honest, they're both a bit soft.
__________________
I am responsible for what I say; not what you understand.
OsmosisStudios
Gear List
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-22-2009, 06:39 PM
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 192
Default

They were both captured in portrait mode. That might be where the softness is coming from. But look at his ribbons on his chest, they seem really blured.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-22-2009, 07:45 PM
archersdad's Avatar
camera Dude
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 304
Default

Are you using a tripod or monopod? 1/60th of a second is plenty of time for handheld vibration to rear it's ugly head. Maybe open the aperature a stop so you can shorten the shutter speed.
__________________
Brad Dudenhoffer
"All you need is Peace, Love, and a solid monopod,"
My flickr | my blog
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-22-2009, 07:54 PM
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 192
Default

No tripod was used. Hopefully that is the problem. I'll try to increase the shuttter speed. I did not want to wast a lot of time so I was running the camera on program mode during the wedding. Hoping the camera would do better then me taking the time to adjust settings.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-23-2009, 12:13 AM
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sonoma Co. CA
Posts: 32
Default Its Your Aperture setting

If you stop down your aperture (shutter opening) you will get more depth of field. A common aperture for group portraits is 11. A 5.6 or wider like you used on these portraits, is fine for a single person portrait. If you are using auto modes than nothing you do is really going to change that as the camera is making all the decisions for you. You need to use manuel or Aperture modes.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-23-2009, 01:51 AM
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 96
Default

I just wanted to say I have the same problem! I have an Xti and can take wonderful closeups but when it comes to distance I get blurry shots. One thing I've been paying attention with lately is the AF. It has to have something defined to focus on. A face isn't real good and the further back you go the harder it is to find something to focus on. I also think Camera shake has something to do with it. I'm not sure but wanted to let you know I have the same problem. It drives me bananas!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-23-2009, 01:55 AM
kirbinster's Avatar
Always carry your camera
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,635
Default

I would guess it is the slow shutter speed for hand held shots. Go back to the "rule" that your shutter speed should be no less than one over the focal length.
__________________
Nikon D700, D300, D5000, NIKON GLASS 85mm F/1.8 D, 105mm f/2.8 Micro AF-S VR, 70-200 AF-S VR f/2.8, 28-300 AF-S VRII,10.5mm Fisheye, 24-70 AF-S f/2.8, TC-20E II AF-S, Sigma 12-24 HSM, Sigma 30mm f/1.4 HSM, Sigma 150-500 OS, 2 SB-600 Speedlights, Manfrotto 190MF3 tripod & 322RC2 ball grip head. - NJ, USA
Flickr Photobucket
Ok to edit and repost my shots on DPS forums
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-23-2009, 09:55 AM
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 604
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SilverBullet07 View Post
Exposure: 0.017 sec (1/60)
Focal Length: 34 mm

Exposure: 0.017 sec (1/60)
Focal Length: 96 mm
The first image had a shutter speed ( (1/)60 ) > focal length (34).

The second image had a shutter speed ( (1)/60) < focal length (96).

A good rule of thumb is that the shutter speed (ignore the 1/) should be at least as much as the focal length. The second image really should have had a shutter speed of at least 1/100 - 100 being greater than 96.

Something else you may want to try is putting it on multiple frame mode, and firing off 2-3 frames at the same time. You'll often find that even if the shutter speed is a little slow, at least one of the frames will be usable.

If you're shooting in Portrait mode, the camera may be smoothing the output photo slightly meybe? Have you tried shooting in manual (M) mode with the same settings and seeing if the resulting image is any sharper?
__________________
blog | flickr | Canon 5DII, 7D

Last edited by rediguana; 04-23-2009 at 09:59 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 04-23-2009, 01:47 PM
Mr Guy's Avatar
dPS +1000 Club
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,566
Default

Obviously hand holding technique and shutter speed have been mentioned, but I want to through out another possibility. Are these out of camera jpeg?

They aren't all that soft in the first place, and the softness you do see in the fine detail is a combination of Canon's denoising, hand holding technique, and possibly some edge softness inherent in your lens.

Look at the bouquet, it doesn't look soft at all.

Try doing a somewhat controlled experiment in similar lighting, if you can, with the in camera noise processing turned off or at least cranked way down, then crank it up without changing the environment.
__________________

But Mom, Pentax IS rebellious
Pentax K-7, K20D
Pentax SMCP-FA 35mm f/2.0 AL -- Pentax SMC 50mm f/1.7 -- Pentax DA 50-200mm f/4-5.6 ED -- Sigma 28-70mm f/2.8 EX DG IF Aspherical -- Pentax DA 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 WR
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0