#11 (permalink)  
Old 10-02-2008, 12:11 AM
JodyGall's Avatar
Secret Society Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 1,150
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ttosifa View Post
Actually, I'm thinking it might have been matrix metering, assuming that is black velvet or something under the basket (and not a product of PP). If so, the dark is much more prominent that the white, and the camera might be exposing for that. You could dial in negative exposure compensation and look at the histogram or the highlight blinkies as a guide.
Yep, matrix metering and black velvety cloth.

Ok...sorry, I'm so bad with all the technical terms....what does dial in negative exposure compensation? LOL! Sorry.
__________________
Jody Gall
website | blog | facebook |
The Mommies Network
Gear: Nikon D40 | Nikon D200 | Nikkor 18-55mm | Nikkor 70-300mm | Tamron 28-75mm 2.8 | Nikkor 50mm 1.8 | sb800 | AB 800
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 10-02-2008, 12:17 AM
KathrynWilson's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 844
Default

I actually WOULD use spot metering. I would go up close to the baby, spot meter off their skin, take a test shot and check the highlights on my camera's histogram. If the whites were blowing I'd meter off the white. It's easier to burn the black out if you bring it up too light than it is to recover blown whites.
__________________
Shooting with all sorts of Canon stuff.
my flickr
my website
Live. Love. Capture. Blog.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 10-02-2008, 12:28 AM
KathrynWilson's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 844
Default

And I actually just opened up the image in Lightroom for a closer look. To get the skin etc to about the right place, the overall shot required a 0.86 increase in exposure, but I was able to recover the whites. Had you exposed correctly for the skin, the whites might have been blown, which is why previous posters have suggested that you 'bracket' - meaning that you shoot and different exposures so that you would get a shot where you had the correct exposure for the skin, and a shot that you had the correct exposure for the white.

Nonetheless, Lightroom was able to recover the blown whites after I upped the exposure for the skintones:
__________________
Shooting with all sorts of Canon stuff.
my flickr
my website
Live. Love. Capture. Blog.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 10-02-2008, 01:17 AM
Loves the moderation team!
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 833
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KathrynWilson View Post
To get the skin etc to about the right place, the overall shot required a 0.86 increase in exposure, but I was able to recover the whites.
Yes, I agree with Kathryn that the overall image was underexposed, even though the whites were blown. I was focused on the dress, so my comment wasn't ideal for the overall shot.

JodyGall, there are excellent sources for exposure compensation, and I couldn't do it justice here. Your manual ought to provide you with some basic information and instructions.

Bracketing the exposure might have worked here, but it would be less useful in shots of a moving baby and less light.

Others are more knowledgeable than I on this topic, but it seems to me that the real problem is the lighting. I think the highlights in the dress are getting blown out because sunlight is being reflected from the dress. Maybe if you could get a white sheet or something to diffuse the direct sunlight on the dress, it would help?
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 10-02-2008, 02:06 AM
candleman's Avatar
Bad at explaining
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Auckland , New Zealand
Posts: 5,866
Lightbulb light bulb turns on

[QUOTE=KathrynWilson;285107]I actually WOULD use spot metering. [QUOTE]

aaahhhh.. ok.. interesting.
i'll have to try that.
hmm... i'm pretty sure when i did the wedding, even metering off skin was not giving a good exposure (in Apeture priority)

maybe i was actually going off the dress but cant remember properly..


good point KathrynWilson. thanks
__________________
My Gear
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 10-03-2008, 02:52 PM
WooD's Avatar
Critique Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Posts: 3,776
Default

Nice shot, and a great edit Kathryn.

I seem to use center weighted metering a lot.
__________________
My Gear


http://www.kevinfair.com
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 10-03-2008, 03:04 PM
JodyGall's Avatar
Secret Society Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 1,150
Default

Okie doke! So general concensus for the future is to experiment with my metering mode and my exposure in post processing? Got it! Off to experiment with post processing on this session!

Ya know, I don't think I've ever changed my metering mode to spot. I'll definitely play aorund with that this weekend! Thanks!
__________________
Jody Gall
website | blog | facebook |
The Mommies Network
Gear: Nikon D40 | Nikon D200 | Nikkor 18-55mm | Nikkor 70-300mm | Tamron 28-75mm 2.8 | Nikkor 50mm 1.8 | sb800 | AB 800
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 10-06-2008, 07:27 PM
Digital SLR | 50-199 Posts
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Central Pennsylvania
Posts: 62
Default

Since no one seemed to cover your on camera exposure compensation (what you would be using to bracket on the auto modes) I figured I'd hop in with that. On the D40 you have a little +/- button right below your shutter release button. This will change your exposure compensation. If you have it at default setting of zero and you take a picture and think that it is too dark or too bright you can adjust that simply by holding that button in and turning the little notched dial. It gives you alittle more control over your exposure in the auto modes and (hopefully) saves you the trouble of adjusting post exposure.

Hope that helps.
__________________
"Five exclamation marks, the sure sign of an insane mind."
Terry Pratchett, "Reaper Man"

flickr
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2011, 01:22 PM
SusanH1970's Avatar
Am I in trouble again?
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Connecticut, USA
Posts: 8,907
Default

Whoa, this is an OLD thread. Jody, I just gotta say you've come such a long way, your work is just amazing now! It's fun to go back and see where we started, though.
__________________
Susan
Canon XSi, 50mm 1.8, Sigma 70-300mm, kit lens, AlienBee 400, 580EXii
My Flickr
My website
Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 03-03-2011, 07:14 PM
Loves the moderation team!
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 271
Default

*L* I didn't even realize this was an old post until I got to Susan's reply. Kathryn's edit was awesome by the way.

Jody, mind if I ask what you ended up doing - spot metering for example? Because I've had this same problem, about a year ago I have a shoot with a baby girl, and a few of the shots (in a basket, in the shade, wearing light clothes) came out very similiar to this. Couldn't figure out what I needed to do since I couldn't expose anymore - the whites were already getting blown out. Good to know we can still learn from each other's posts 3 years afterwards!
__________________
Sarah ~ I love my Canon 50D
Website
Facebook
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0