#1 (permalink)  
Old 08-30-2008, 09:02 PM
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 48
Default Ideal Glass for Photographing People?

Hello-

I'm a bit of a noob. I am looking to upgrade my lenses. I currently only have a kit lens that comes with my Nikon d300, a Nikkor 18-200mm, 3.5-5.6.

I've done a handful of weddings with this and a some portraits. I've actually gotten some real good results with it but I now want to upgrade my lenses to improve.

What would you recommend for portrait and wedding photography?

I'm not looking for anything fancy, just workhorse lenses that will be an upgrade to what I have and improve the quality.

So, in addition, I guess I would love to know what other photographers here use most often, when it comes to weddings and portraits?
__________________
:: Jordan ::
Another BLOG for the fire
Project Fallen Heroes
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-30-2008, 09:17 PM
Saralonde's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Western PA, USA
Posts: 6,232
Default

Do you have a particular budget?
A good budget lens for portraits would be the Nikon 50mm f/1.8. It would serve you well in low light and for close portraits.
I'm not as familar with Nikon lenses since I use Canon. Try looking for a lens that can be used in low light or perhaps has image stabilization since you will be taking a lot of handheld shots. I've used a Canon 17-55 f/2.8 IS for weddings with good results. A lens that can cover some distance like a 70-200mm would be helpful, too.

I'm sure you'll get more suggestions.
__________________
Linda
My Gear
OK to re-edit and repost my shots on dps
flickr
My Blog
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-30-2008, 09:26 PM
xxpinballxx's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cleveland Ohio
Posts: 3,955
Send a message via Yahoo to xxpinballxx
Default

Saralonde...we'll overlook your liking to canon....lol!
THe 50mm is a great lens for portrait and might want to think of the 90mm for a bit more distance from the subjects....fast lenses and usually primes are the choice for portraiture.
I think for just starting out or "Noob" as you put it you got a trememdous start with the D300! There are a few nice telephoto 2.8's that are also really nice....the 18-200mm 2.8 is a good choice. I think selling the 18-200mm you have for a constant 2.8 18-200mm is a great idea especially for a all around lens.
__________________
Feel free to re-edit my photos and repost here.
D200, 18-55mm, 70-300mm, 50mm, 28-300mm, 10-20mm, 105mm 2.8
RoundboyzPhotography on Flickr
RoundboyzPhotographyBlog
My Twitter
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-30-2008, 09:55 PM
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 48
Default

Thanks! Very helpful.

One question though, is the 50mm 1.4 worth the extra money or would it make more sense to stick with the 1.8?
__________________
:: Jordan ::
Another BLOG for the fire
Project Fallen Heroes
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08-30-2008, 10:05 PM
xxpinballxx's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cleveland Ohio
Posts: 3,955
Send a message via Yahoo to xxpinballxx
Default

I have heard the differences between the two are minimal build is great on both and at 1.8 its fast as I ever needed.....if you got the extra money i think its a personal choice. I would rather take that extra few bucks and invest in something else...or an older 90mm or even a 28mm.
__________________
Feel free to re-edit my photos and repost here.
D200, 18-55mm, 70-300mm, 50mm, 28-300mm, 10-20mm, 105mm 2.8
RoundboyzPhotography on Flickr
RoundboyzPhotographyBlog
My Twitter
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 08-30-2008, 11:30 PM
kirbinster's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,799
Default

I am fairly certain there is no such thing as a Nikon 18-200 f/2.8 lens. If there was I can imagine there would be a lot of zeros at the end of it.

I have an 80-200 f/2.8 which is a great lens, but I think the list on it is around $900. There is a 70-200 f/2.8 AF-s but it goes for around $1,600. Both are great lenses.
__________________
Nikon D300, D80, D5000, NIKON GLASS 50mm f/1.8, 85mm F/1.8 D, 18-200 AF-S VR, 70-300AF-S VR, 70-200VR AF-S VR f/2.8, 10.5mm Fisheye, 24-70 AF-S f/2.8, Sigma 10-20mm, Tamron 200-500mm, 2 SB-600 Speedlights, Manfrotto 190MF3 tripod & 322RC2 ball grip head. - NJ, USA
Flickr Photobucket
Ok to edit and repost my shots on DPS forums

Last edited by kirbinster; 08-30-2008 at 11:32 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2008, 06:21 AM
Super Zoom
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Central Oregon, USA
Posts: 786
Default

A 50mm or an 85mm are my two favorite portrait lenses. Get the fastest you can afford.
__________________
www.imagesbyjeffkennedy.com

Known troublemaker.

I feel a lot more like I do now than I did a minute ago.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2008, 07:28 PM
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 49
Default

Echoing what everyone else said, I have shot some very very beautiful photos with 50mm f/1.8. So cheap too it's almost a steal. I also have the Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 that I would highly recommend if you want something versatile. But if I could get any lens though for portrait, it would be 85mm f/1.8. The length is perfect for portrait in my opinion and 85mm prime is a beautiful lens.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008, 12:08 AM
Point & Shoot
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: CT
Posts: 5
Default Noob question

Hey guys,

I'm a noob too. What do you mean by "prime?"

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008, 12:18 AM
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 49
Default

This is the place to learn!

Primes are lenses that do not zoom. Now why in the world would you want that? For a few reasons:

1) Best quality. Since they don't zoom, manufactures can focus everything they have on image quality. Although now zoom lenses are catching up, photographers will always swear prime lenses produce the best quality.

2) Cheap(er). They are tons cheaper. Making zoom lenses are tricky so they up the price. But prime lenses are easy(er) to make, so they don't cost as much.

3) Fast. And by fast, I mean they have a low f-stop (a very wide apeture) so they can let a lot of light in, so you can shoot in low light conditions with faster shutter speeds, and they provide shallow depth of field (that beautiful blurring of the background) you see in pictures.

Primes rock! but they can't zoom, that's the only trade-off. Make sure you google terms you don't know, the internet, including this site, is filled with information. Good luck!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0