#1 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2011, 05:33 PM
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 6
Lightbulb Which lense to use to portrait slender legs?

I have read the policy re: nudity, and hopefully this post does not violate the rules. I am a newbie in photography and need some help in choosing a lense due to work reasons. Please interpret this thread from a business perspective. Thanks in advance!


I am looking into shooting models, with emphasis on portraiting long, slender legs. Such as the sample photos posted here.

Can someone advise what specific lense(s) from Nikon I should consider getting, when using a D7000?

I was considering using 50 / 85mm, but then these look as if they were shot with a wide angle.

Your thoughts please.



Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2011, 07:04 PM
Rentham's Avatar
Everything is permissible
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 839
Default

Wide angle lenses stretch and elongate perspective. You'll want to start in the 24mm range, I'd guess.

The example photos aren't too explicit, but a slightly NSF warning in the thread title would have been welcome.
__________________
Mike Evers
Rentham Creative | Twitter | Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2011, 07:44 PM
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 6
Default

My bad, I tried to go back to edit the title of the post, but doesn't look like the system would let me.

#1 Should I get a FF 24mm, or zoom lense, say from 24-85mm?

#2 Do you suspect the distortions in these samples were done by software tweaking? Or direct result of lenses used?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2011, 07:59 PM
Rentham's Avatar
Everything is permissible
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 839
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FX35 View Post
My bad, I tried to go back to edit the title of the post, but doesn't look like the system would let me.

#1 Should I get a FF 24mm, or zoom lense, say from 24-85mm?

#2 Do you suspect the distortions in these samples were done by software tweaking? Or direct result of lenses used?
I prefer primes, so I'd go with the 24mm lens. I can't say if there was any additional distortion added in post. Getting close to the legs with a wide angle lens will make them (or anything else) appear much longer. Even at 24mm the effect can be quite pronounced.
__________________
Mike Evers
Rentham Creative | Twitter | Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2011, 09:54 PM
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 6
Default

So in other words, I should go with 24mm and above (ie 35.......etc), right?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2011, 10:07 PM
Rentham's Avatar
Everything is permissible
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 839
Default

The further you go in focal length, the more effect it will have on perspective. The wider you go, the more perspective is stretched. Telephoto focal lengths will compress perspective.

So yes, 24mm will give more of an effect than 35mm. You can go wider, but then you start to get into big time distortion. I find 24mm to be a happy medium for wide angle and people.
__________________
Mike Evers
Rentham Creative | Twitter | Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2011, 10:38 PM
zona5101's Avatar
Molon Labe
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 7,060
Default

you'd probably have increased success of elongating the leg while minimizing the distortion of a super wide angle lens if you were using a full frame camera.
__________________
They call me Bruce
www.brucebphotography.wordpress.com
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 08-02-2011, 01:19 AM
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 6
Default

That's probably true, but I can't afford a FX camera right now, so we'll make to somehow make do with a DX, by the help of a lense + angle.

I am going to try out 24mm f/2.8D. Will post resulting photos for you guys to comment on.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 08-02-2011, 01:35 AM
OsmosisStudios's Avatar
Don't Panic
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Mississauga / Ottawa
Posts: 11,358
Default

Here's an example of 10mm (on DX). Slightly NSFW

It's exaggerated. Very much so. But thats the point.
__________________
I am responsible for what I say; not what you understand.
OsmosisStudios
Gear List
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 08-02-2011, 02:49 AM
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 6
Default

Hmmmm. The samples I posted is not as distored as the one your posted, but close.

I am going to try out the 24mm and see what results I get.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0