#1 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2011, 09:39 PM
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 16
Question Shootingpeople WIDE open at 1.2-1.8 questions

Hello,
is anyone shoot portraits or models photosessions with lens wide open? I'm talking abt 1.2 -1.8 (especially 1.2)
I have 50 1.2L and when i tried to shoot model at 1.8 she was soft not in focus , but i think this was because i was standing at least 2 meters from her.

Can u please tell if you shooting at 1.2 what you need to do? what should be apx distance between camera and a model and what i need to do if i want ALL her face in focus or for example all her face and shoulders in focus.

How to understand that "safe"distance to achiave sharp focus wihen shooting wide open?


Thank you!!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2011, 09:55 PM
zona5101's Avatar
Molon Labe
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 7,060
Default

depth of field calculator should give you the information you need...
Online Depth of Field Calculator
__________________
They call me Bruce
www.brucebphotography.wordpress.com
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2011, 09:57 PM
autofocus's Avatar
Live Life, Take Pictures
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4,522
Default

There really isn't a set rule as to camera to subject distance..it really is a matter of how you want to compose your shot (full, 3/4, head shot, etc) However, the closer you are to the subject, the shallower the depth of field. Shooting wide open at f/1.2 will offer very very little depth of field especially if your subject is at a slight angle to the camera. It's not unusual when shooting like that to have one eye in sharp focus with the other eye soft. Unless you can be absolutely sure that your subjects head is exactly perpendicular to the axis of the lens will be the only way to get both eyes sharp. Bear in mind though, the tip of the nose and the ears will be soft. Why are you bent on shooting full wide open? Unless you are dealing with bad light there should be no need to do that. A much better setting for a portrait of an individual subject with that lens would probably be ~f/3.2...shallow enough to still help separate your subject from the background, and better chance of sharp focus on the subject
__________________
Vince "...the law of unintended consequences, sometimes, you get a truly memorable photograph"
Gear: Canon G2, Canon 20D, Nikon D300...bunch of lenses
http://www.flickr.com/photos/20127329@N06/
www.montalbanophotography.com
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-22-2011, 09:17 AM
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 16
Default

Why i want to shoot wide open..hmm. I saw pictures shoot at 1.2 and they was really nice.
So you want to say - shooting wide open is not normal practise for portrait photography?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 06-22-2011, 11:48 AM
autofocus's Avatar
Live Life, Take Pictures
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4,522
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rusteam View Post
Why i want to shoot wide open..hmm. I saw pictures shoot at 1.2 and they was really nice.
So you want to say - shooting wide open is not normal practise for portrait photography?
A basic tenet in portrait photography is to have good focus on the eyes, and for all the reasons I mentioned above shooting wide open can make it difficult to attain that.
__________________
Vince "...the law of unintended consequences, sometimes, you get a truly memorable photograph"
Gear: Canon G2, Canon 20D, Nikon D300...bunch of lenses
http://www.flickr.com/photos/20127329@N06/
www.montalbanophotography.com
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06-22-2011, 12:17 PM
zona5101's Avatar
Molon Labe
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 7,060
Default

given you want to shoot at f1.2... going back to the DOF calculator you would back into your subject distance by your desired depth of field. Say you want from the tip of the nose to the back of the ear in focus...if that is 6" then with a 50mm on a crop body you would need to have the subject at 10' in order to achieve a 6" dof.. You will also have to focus 1/2 way into your 6" depth of field so you have 3" in front and 3" in back of the actual focus point (in other words, your 10 foot point can't be the tip of the nose, it has to be 1/2 way between the nose and ear focus limits)
__________________
They call me Bruce
www.brucebphotography.wordpress.com
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 06-22-2011, 12:36 PM
SusanH1970's Avatar
Am I in trouble again?
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Connecticut, USA
Posts: 9,171
Default

I shoot wide open (at f/1.8, if I had the 1.2L, I'd probably shoot at f/1.2, lol) all the time. I just loooooove the bokeh from shooting wide open. But, as Vinnie and Bruce both said, it can be very tricky, and it took me a long time to figure out how to get correct focus, and to know which shots I could do it with, and which ones it would better serve me to close down.

These were all shot at f/1.8:

IMG_0831aweb | Flickr - Photo Sharing!

1 | Flickr - Photo Sharing!

17 | Flickr - Photo Sharing!

IMG_8272bwweb | Flickr - Photo Sharing!

When I'm photographing a toddler that moves around a lot, I've found it's hard to nail focus wide open - the tiniest move will throw at least part of the image out of focus - so I usually close down a bit for that age range.

The DOF calculator posted above is a great tool. Understanding how DOF is affected by aperture, focal length, and distance from your subject is most of the battle in learning how to shoot wide open.
__________________
Susan
Mostly Canon stuff
My Flickr
Facebook - new photos always posted and always happy for new "likes"!
Website going through an overhaul!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 06-22-2011, 01:30 PM
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 16
Default

i checked DOF calculator for f1,2 50 1.2 with 5dmarkii.
I GOT THIS:
Subject distance 1 cm

Depth of field
Near limit 1 cm
Far limit 1 cm
Total 0 cm

In front of subject 0 cm (50%)
Behind subject 0 cm (50%)

Hyperfocal distance 7012.5 cm
Circle of confusion 0.03 mm

If i only could understand what it means in practise!! So how far i need to place by object to get her face in focus??
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 06-22-2011, 02:16 PM
zona5101's Avatar
Molon Labe
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 7,060
Default

when are you going to have a subject distance of 1 cm?

on the dof calculator:
select your camera
set the focal length to 50mm
set the fstop to 1.2
PICK a realistic subject distance, say 100 centimeters
then look to the right or the graphic below and note your total range of sharp focus is 2.71 cm. If that range is too small (or too big) then PICK a different subject distance until you get the dof value you want - maybe make a chart or something to take into the field with various camera to subject distances and the corresponding limits of focus.
__________________
They call me Bruce
www.brucebphotography.wordpress.com
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 06-22-2011, 02:24 PM
autofocus's Avatar
Live Life, Take Pictures
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4,522
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rusteam View Post
i checked DOF calculator for f1,2 50 1.2 with 5dmarkii.
I GOT THIS:
Subject distance 1 cm

Depth of field
Near limit 1 cm
Far limit 1 cm
Total 0 cm

In front of subject 0 cm (50%)
Behind subject 0 cm (50%)

Hyperfocal distance 7012.5 cm
Circle of confusion 0.03 mm

If i only could understand what it means in practise!! So how far i need to place by object to get her face in focus??
You have the subject distance set to 1cm...obviously, you will NOT be shooting from that distance. A lot of help has already been offered here. Let me suggest you first learn what it all means. Until such time, as I suggested above, you should try shooting with your aperture closed down a bit until you get a better understanding of all this. Concerning this question.."So how far i need to place by object to get her face in focus??" ...there is no set distance that you have to be. Just understand that the closer you are to the subject will reduce your DOF and make focusing while shooting wide open more critical
__________________
Vince "...the law of unintended consequences, sometimes, you get a truly memorable photograph"
Gear: Canon G2, Canon 20D, Nikon D300...bunch of lenses
http://www.flickr.com/photos/20127329@N06/
www.montalbanophotography.com
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0