|
||||
|
Yup....this. We do need to see examples with EXIF if we are going to be able to offer you some help. We're a pretty friendly bunch and would love to help.
|
|
||||
|
How to Take Sharp Digital Images. It's probably not just the focus that's an issue.
And secondly, Bryan Peterson's Understanding Exposure may help you figure out iso/aperture/shutter speed and how they interact with each other.
__________________
I shoot with a Canon 5DmkII, 50D, and S90, and Pansonic G3. flickr stream and equipment list Last edited by inkista; 10-26-2010 at 01:45 AM. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
That's one article I hadn't seen, and I thought I'd read pretty much everything on the blog. Bookmarked to share in the future. |
|
||||
|
Thank you for the encouraging replies! I'm a little gun-shy after a bad experience on another forum; hoping the "friendly group" comment rings true!
Will check out that article, thank you. In the meantime, I wanted to throw some examples up (forgive the idiocy of the blind initial post - I was typing one-handed w/my baby and couldn't manage much more). All of these are shot with the 35mm f1.8. Here's the newborn shot I really like (and know others won't): ![]() ISO500, 1/60, f 1.8 Here are a bunch of frustrating lost shots: Mouth in focus - eyes dull and not: ![]() ISO1000, 1/800, f 1.8 Just not at all crisp: ![]() ISO1000, 1/80, f 4.5 Not crisp; dull eyes: ![]() ISO800, 1/25, f 5 Continued... |
|
||||
|
Ok, this one is a focus issue--with portraits, they'll feel more in focus if the eyes are in focus. And you were shooting wide open. Given that you had a shutter speed of 1/800s, you had a little latitude there to stop down the lens to a smaller aperture for more DoF. You could have taken the shutter speed down to 1/100s, and given yourself three extra stops (a stop is a doubling of the light. 1/800 -> 1/400 -> 1/200 -> 1/100 is increasing by three stops). So, that you could have closed down the aperture to f/5 and still had the same exposure.
Quote:
Quote:
Also, the "dull" part? Could be the fact that you probably haven't post-processed anything here. By default dSLRs tend to be as neutral and hands-off on post-processing as possible. P&S cameras tweak sharpness and saturation in a one-size-fits-all manner. If you don't want to go through post-processing to get the best out of every image individually, you may want to consider messing with the in-camera processing settings. Note again, no catchlight in the eyes. You have to place a light source somewhere that it can be reflected in the eyes, or with dark eyes, detail will be lost in shadow. But note, too, that using a smaller aperture (f/4 vs. f/1.8), you have more DoF, and your background isn't as blurred as it is the other shots. Quote:
In this situation, turn on another light, or add a flash. A camera needs more light to see by than the human eye. If you'd had an external flash unit, like an SB-600, you could have bounced the flash off the wall behind you, and gotten catchlights in the eyes.
__________________
I shoot with a Canon 5DmkII, 50D, and S90, and Pansonic G3. flickr stream and equipment list Last edited by inkista; 10-26-2010 at 02:45 AM. |
|
||||
|
Thank you so much for the thoughtful reply. I really appreciate everything you suggest.
Questions: 1-Re: PP (in terms of eye luminosity). How is this best achieved? I'm taking a PS course in March (and am very impatient!) and in the meantime, putter around with my iPhoto (I don't even have PS at this point). Can I do anything before taking the class in terms of learning how to enhance/process? 2-The high ISOs were all because of lighting, you're right. It was just circumstance over and over that I was shooting in poorly-lit areas (bathtub at night - outside at dusk). So say you want to shoot the kids in the bath. What do you do in terms of lighting? I do have an SB-600! Tomorrow night is bath night...maybe I'll take notes here and bounce and report back . I'm just gun-shy on a lot of artificial lighting as I learn since I know so many purists and am basically winging it here.A lot of the photography I admire is shot in natural light - assuming that's the case, how do you structure the setting to make sure there are catchlights? Thanks again! Last edited by Amanda0102; 10-26-2010 at 03:08 AM. |
|
||||
|
Oh and one more question - re: focusing on the eyes. This sounds ridiculously stupid, but WHERE exactly to focus? I've tried one eye, which leaves the other soft. I've tried between the eyes which makes neither sharp. ????
Things like this make up for my continued frustration... |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.
This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.
Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:
For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!
To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.
Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter: