Quote:
Originally Posted by sybren
Focus and exposure are two orthogonal concepts, i.e. have nothing to do with one another. There is auto/manual exposure and auto/manual focus.
|
Changing the shutter speed, aperture, and iso to get proper
manual exposure: I believe I have this down with an occasional screw up, which is easily adjusted.
The
manual focus is definitely where my struggle is. After testing and reading I think that my kit lens is not supposed to be used for anything other than auto focus. It can do it however it is not going to be a convenience. I say this because it has no focus ring and nobody seems to know what I mean by A/M on the lens itself. (It could just be my wording that is confusing? sorry.)
What is the point of having the choice of
auto or manual on the lens? If it really makes no difference?
Quote:
Originally Posted by sybren
I can imagine sharpness being a factor in this. However, colour and bokeh have very little to do with the way you focus, and more with the exposure (proper exposure gives more saturated colours, and an opened aperture gives more bokeh). I'm under the impression that you're mixing things up in your head, and choosing manual focus for the wrong reasons. Of course, you're the photographer, so you decide how you shoot. Just spend a few more minutes to decide what's really creating the effect you're after.
|
Yes I think I may
say manual focus as a general term for everything involved, steps to getting proper exposure and focusing, etc. I do understand the difference, so thank you for pointing that out. I generally consider the steps we take in our compositions all one in the same. my bad!