#1 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2009, 05:30 PM
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 26
Default Need your opinion on this portrait

Hello!

I made this picture split tone using lightroom and had mixed feelings on this portrait. Want and need your valuable opinion.
The model is my sis and while I like this picture a lot, she doesn't like the way she looks in it. I think it's subjective, but she says she looks unhappy in the picture.
I wanted thoughts on firstly the if the split tone works, the feel of the picture, and if they expression on the model is A) nice, B) suits the mood of the picture, C) if she's pretty!

Thanks for your time!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg jk.jpg (37.1 KB, 68 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2009, 06:28 PM
Trader's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 1,091
Default

I agree with your sister.
__________________

flickr

Nikon D300; Nikkor 50mm f/1.4D, Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G, Nikkor 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G, Nikkor 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G, Nikkor 300mm f/2.8G ED AF-S VR IF, Tamron 18-270mm f/3.5-6.3, Nikon AF-STC-20Eii 2.0x Teleconverter and 2 SB-900s with reflectors, light stands, LumiQuest Softbox iii, & umbrellas.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2009, 07:11 PM
PhotoPhix's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 335
Default

While the subject is very pretty, the pp work and the background ruin the shot.


Armando
__________________
40d Gripped 17-40L 70-200 2.8 isL

WWW.PhotoPhix.net
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2009, 07:20 PM
LostMahbles's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 85
Default

I have to disagree with the notion that the PP ruins the shot. I agree with your sister in the sense that she doesn't look happy, but I also think that works for the shot and for the post processing. I guess what I'm saying is, to each his own, but I actually really liked it.
__________________
Bryan | flickr | site | twitter
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2009, 08:37 PM
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 26
Default

LostMahbles, thanks for your thoughts. I thought the PP looked much better than the original, the original actually was a lackluster pic so I messed around and try to bring the image to life.

Photophix: what about the PP do you think ruined the shot? While I do agree the background is not anything stunning, i contemplated on removing the rows of cars in photoshop but decided to leave it in there, so bring a sense of a more 'casual' look to the picture, like taken out in the streets on the spur of the moment.

Trader: haha, I'll be sure to tell her that!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2009, 08:48 PM
KathrynWilson's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 844
Default

The PP ruins the shot in so far as I don't think those colors and tones would be flattering to anyone's skin for a portrait shot. It might look nice on architecture possibly, but not people.

I like the model's expression and she is gorgeous, though the hair across the face is a little distracting, and I find the background a little bright.
__________________
Shooting with all sorts of Canon stuff.
my flickr
my website
Live. Love. Capture. Blog.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2009, 08:51 PM
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 26
Default

Thanks Kathryn. What split tones colors would you suggest on people? This was a yellow and blue, hence the green result.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2009, 09:19 PM
KathrynWilson's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 844
Default

I would recommend avoiding them almost completely for portraits to be honest. Maybe you could get away with it for full body crops where the subject(s) are further away, but when it's a fairly close-up shot I think most split tones would be messing with the skin tones just for the sake of it. A nice warm toned duotone black & white is nice sometimes, or a very slight split tone for a vintage look to give a little extra blue to the shadows and warm color to the highlights. But on the whole I try to avoid it unless there are very special circumstances, and even then it's best to stick to one sort of tone you're trying to add. Here's one time (before and after) I've done it myself, because I felt like a vintage thing HAD to be done. This is one of the only instances I can recall doing this sort of thing. Skintones do tend to look best the way they are

__________________
Shooting with all sorts of Canon stuff.
my flickr
my website
Live. Love. Capture. Blog.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2009, 10:28 PM
PhotoPhix's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 335
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mykekim View Post

Photophix: what about the PP do you think ruined the shot? While I do agree the background is not anything stunning, i contemplated on removing the rows of cars in photoshop but decided to leave it in there, so bring a sense of a more 'casual' look to the picture, like taken out in the streets on the spur of the moment.

!

The color you chose to tone the photo isnt flattering.

As for the background, rather than removing them I would suggest adding some lens blur as they might make a nice bokeh.


Armando
__________________
40d Gripped 17-40L 70-200 2.8 isL

WWW.PhotoPhix.net
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2009, 12:44 AM
denja's Avatar
Loves the moderation team!
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 222
Default

I personally am not a big fan of split tone processing on portraits, but I applaud your effort. I think this image would be a great candidate for simulated cross processing. Probably E6 developed as C41. She is very pretty, but I don't think any models like the effect of special processing. Again, I really like your approach of trying different techniques, but I think you might like the results of a cross processing approach for portraits (actually I mean people, not necessarily posed portraits). Have fun in your digital darkroom!
__________________
Kodak Z1012, Pentax PZ10, PZ1, Bronica ETRS, Mamiya C330
Pentax FA 28-80, FA 100-300, FA 1.4 80, AF 330 FTZ
Bronica 75, 150, AE-II Finder, 120 Back, 220 Back
Mamiya 55, 80, 180
Vivitar 2000, 283, 550 FD/Weston Master II,Wein Flash Meter
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0