|
|||
|
I like the exposure and colour balance on this image. Everything looks realistic and lifelike. The only problem I have is that the subjects are centred vertically in the frame. They are spot on horizontally, but I suggest maybe a tighter crop closer to them and less of the outside frame. Otherwise a good shot.
|
|
||||
|
Thank you very much for your comments. I can see what you mean about them being centred vertically. I think I was too busy worrying about them being on the thirds line horizontally, and making sure the line of the stone breaker was not going through the centre. I struggle with how to place things in the vertical axis when they take up a lot of the frame height, any guidance on this would be greatly appreciated
How is this for an attempt to re-crop it? I wish I had more room at the bottom, unfortunately the originally was my in-camera crop.
__________________
Samsung NX5 14.2MP (MILC or CSC) with 18-55mm kit lens. +1, +2, +3 and +10 close up lens. 50-200mm zoom lens. Olympus Mju 790SW Tough P+S Husband: "Depth of field calculator? Does that tell you how far down your potatoes are?" |
|
||||
|
I like the exposure, and colors as well, and think it's a cute capture. My only suggestion was going to be the tighter crop which I think you've done a nice job on... I would play with it too, and see if a crop higher above their heads is better.
__________________
Pentax K- 5 50mm 1.4 35-100mm 2.4 "The only photographer you should compare yourself to is the one you used to be!" Starr Lit Photography Site |
|
||||
|
That stone of wall is leading my eyes away from the couple. I don't think the crop, really, was much better. They do need more headroom and less sand/stone foreground. But regardless, that wall is still an issue. One way to have helped this background is by blurring it with use of wide aperture (less than f/4 seems ideal in this scenario). Everything is almost in focus in this photo that yes, to me, it is busy.
A different angle on this shot would have been better, like if you had shot them standing behind them facing the beach with two different focusses (two different shots) - one is a focus on the stone they are holding and use of a very wide aperture so that the DOF is quite narrow; the second one with focus on their face with a narrow f/stop (aperture) to get their faces in focus, hands slightly in focus but as foreground. They would be left side of the shot giving some 'throwing' room to the right side. The background, then, becomes the blurry sea. Whether the wall comes into play as part of the background, it wouldn't be as distracting as the line of the wall would be perpendicular with them. My suggestion you standing behind them and focussing on the stone they are holding makes more sense especially that you mentioned you are more practiced with taking inanimate objects. You could have used them as props. The second suggestion of taking a second shot with the focus on their faces is your practice on people photography. I would have then, exposed for the background first by underexposing it using Manual mode to avoid over brightness, and then play around with fill flash on the couple. +10 if the shot was closely taken during golden hours for more dramatic effect. I hope what I wrote made sense....it's past midnight here and my brain is starting to fade. Anyhoo, I hope you understood what I wrote. Just keep in mind that if you do want to improve on people shots: (1) blur the background if it's busy or distracting from your subjects; (2) learn fill flash to lighten your subjects under extreme ambient conditions or lack of it. Just using those two techniques will extremely help you improve your photography. Cheers, Grace |
|
||||
|
Thanks for all your wise words and gentle encouragement, so much food for thought next time I'm shooting people. It really is so helpful for me having people critique my shots. I shall be dragging family members out on more adventures so I can get more practice soon.
There's always so much to think about, but I guess like with driving, eventually you have so many lessons and so much practice and it starts to become more natural.
__________________
Samsung NX5 14.2MP (MILC or CSC) with 18-55mm kit lens. +1, +2, +3 and +10 close up lens. 50-200mm zoom lens. Olympus Mju 790SW Tough P+S Husband: "Depth of field calculator? Does that tell you how far down your potatoes are?" |
|
||||
|
Thanks Terri33inne, I think you're right, they look a bit hunched up, like they're trying to keep within my frame.
__________________
Samsung NX5 14.2MP (MILC or CSC) with 18-55mm kit lens. +1, +2, +3 and +10 close up lens. 50-200mm zoom lens. Olympus Mju 790SW Tough P+S Husband: "Depth of field calculator? Does that tell you how far down your potatoes are?" |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.
This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.
Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:
For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!
To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.
Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter: