#1 (permalink)  
Old 09-22-2011, 10:56 PM
Swanner Photography's Avatar
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 207
Default 3 week old

Weighing in at 5 pounds. I have only worked with few babies. This little baby was the smallest of them yet. Any Critque would be helpful.

It was lite bit a med octogon softbox.

Manual settings

Exposure Time: 0.0050 s (1/200)

Aperture: f/11.0

ISO Equiv.: 400


Photobucket
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-23-2011, 06:58 PM
Swanner Photography's Avatar
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 207
Default

Bump!!!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-23-2011, 08:26 PM
Niresangwa's Avatar
Hack
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 2,013
Default

Why did you elect to go with a portrait crop, especially what seems to be a non-standard one, on an image that lends itself naturally to landscape?

Though I"m a fan of negative space, it's not well used here.

Secondly the range of contrast is a little harsh. You have blindly, hanging-on-to-what-little-details-hey-have white highlights amongst otherwise greyscale shadows.

I'd much rather see the lights powered down and be softer.

The catch lights are huge, to the point that they completely dominate the eyes... they almost look like irises. Irises with no pupil are scary looking.

The dry skin on the kids arm and back... I'm not a parent, and not a maternity photographer, but as someone critiquing your shot, I'd rather see it cloned out.

The whole image looks soft too, at least in the image you've embedded, which is quite large. Te URL you've linked the image to is just the photobucket homepage, so i can't look any closer.

Finally, not an inspiring pose particularly. Of course poses are popular for a reason, that doesn't mean it doesnt feel vanilla.
__________________
Website ... Blog ... Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-23-2011, 09:38 PM
Swanner Photography's Avatar
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 207
Default

Thanks for the feedback.

This shot was shot portrait and not landscape.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-23-2011, 10:51 PM
Swanner Photography's Avatar
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 207
Default

Ok So I did some editing to it.

As this helped?

Photobucket
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-23-2011, 10:55 PM
Swanner Photography's Avatar
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 207
Default

Oh I did leave the dry skin bc I think that all newborn babies has this ( my three did and everyone I have seen) so I thought It was natural.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09-23-2011, 11:07 PM
sk66's Avatar
Lovable Contrarian
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 6,744
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Niresangwa View Post
Why did you elect to go with a portrait crop, especially what seems to be a non-standard one, on an image that lends itself naturally to landscape?

Though I"m a fan of negative space, it's not well used here.

Secondly the range of contrast is a little harsh. You have blindly, hanging-on-to-what-little-details-hey-have white highlights amongst otherwise greyscale shadows.

I'd much rather see the lights powered down and be softer.

The catch lights are huge, to the point that they completely dominate the eyes... they almost look like irises. Irises with no pupil are scary looking.

The dry skin on the kids arm and back... I'm not a parent, and not a maternity photographer, but as someone critiquing your shot, I'd rather see it cloned out.

The whole image looks soft too, at least in the image you've embedded, which is quite large. Te URL you've linked the image to is just the photobucket homepage, so i can't look any closer.

Finally, not an inspiring pose particularly. Of course poses are popular for a reason, that doesn't mean it doesnt feel vanilla.
Who are you to be critiquing a pro? You're just a hack!

Sheesh...it's obviously fantastic!
__________________
Steve
the Photographic Academy.com
My Portfolio, My Flickr, My Blog
D4, D7000, G10, 1030SW and a bunch of other stuff....
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 09-23-2011, 11:21 PM
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3
Default

The second crop does work better for me. Too much negative space in the first one. I'm fine with dry skin because most babies have it. I also helps that it's black and white. At that age the skin is still all splotchy. I agree the pose isn't particularly creative, but it was reasonably well executed (I've seen that shot a hundred times where it looked liked the baby was about to fall) And at that age there isn't much to do with them.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 09-24-2011, 12:15 AM
SusanH1970's Avatar
Am I in trouble again?
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Connecticut, USA
Posts: 9,171
Default

The crop is much better in your second version, and I like the smaller catchlight in baby's right eye. His left eye still looks really wonky, though. I honestly wouldn't show this one. Do you have any others in this pose?
__________________
Susan
Mostly Canon stuff
My Flickr
Facebook - new photos always posted and always happy for new "likes"!
Website going through an overhaul!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 09-24-2011, 02:05 AM
Swanner Photography's Avatar
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 207
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SusanH1970 View Post
The crop is much better in your second version, and I like the smaller catchlight in baby's right eye. His left eye still looks really wonky, though. I honestly wouldn't show this one. Do you have any others in this pose?
The other shots I have, her lil arm is hanging and I didnt like that. In this shot I put her arm up on her face. The lighting in her eyes is the same as this one though.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0