|
|||
|
First off nice shot. The photo is set to private on flickr.
Do you have photoshop or other software? Try sharpening it up a bit see if that helps.
__________________
Flickr Page |
|
||||
|
Shooting at 1/30 is very slow. The issue is most likely camera shake. What were the focal length and ISO?
|
|
||||
|
For hand-held, your shutter speed was too slow. Try bumping up the ISO to increase the shutter speed. I'm pretty sure the lack of sharpness is down to camera shake.
__________________
>> Mark << http://www.chalkphotography.co.uk FLICKR - http://www.flickr.com/photos/23750587@N02/ |
|
||||
|
I forgot where I heard it or if it is true, but it seems to work and make sense. I was once told that the slowest shutter speed shoult be what focal length your lens is. Example if you shoot 50 mm you shouldn't shoot below 1/60, if its 200mm shouldn't shoot below 1/200. This might have just been made up somewhere but I tend to follow it as I can almost see it making sense. A 200mm lens is pretty heavy so the faster you shoot, the less you have to worry about camera shake.
__________________
Flickr Facebook Fan Me! My Photography Site/Blog ~This post is a natural product made from recycled electrons. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects.~ |
|
|||
|
You know, I remember reading that rule about focal length and shutter speed. Maybe that's where I went wrong. I must not have had enough light, like I thought I did. Regarding ISO, I had it set to Auto. I don't think it was too high since I don't see much in the way of noise. I'm still new to photography rules. LOL. I've only been studying this art for the last 6 weeks.
|
|
||||
|
If you bump you ISO a notch, you could change your shutter speed to 1/60 and still have the same exposure, but probably with less camera shake. Because of low light, I often end up shooting with my 50mm and find that anything below that is difficult to keep sharp. You could also afford to go a few stops lower on aperture and keep his entire face in focus; the wider aperture would again allow for a faster shutter speed.
__________________
Mike H. (irishmuth) Feel free to edit and re-post my pics irishmuth's Flicker Page |
|
|||
|
If you're shooting with the Canon kit lens, I'm guessing that's an 18-55mm lens? Either way, despite that rule about shutter speed vs focal length, you really don't want to be going below 1/60 hand-held, unless you can stand properly and hold the camera absolutely rock steady.
You wanted his whole face in focus - to be honest, if you're shooting at the zoomy end of the lens, then for a portrait like that you're probably a reasonable distance away, so you could get away with opening the aperture up a little bit more and still have enough depth of field. If you were shooting at the wide end, then back away from your subject a little and go in with the zoom, then you can open the aperture by a stop or two, which will let you speed the shutter up a little. Also, you could have minor issue with your autofocus - do you use a set focus point when you shoot, or do you use the automatic setting where the camera decides which focus point it wants to use? If you're using the former, then you might want to make sure you're putting the one you use right over one of the eyes when you focus. If you're using the latter, then you may find as I did that whatever you take a photo of, and however you compose it, the camera will ALWAYS pick the wrong point.. ![]() As a tip, if you have an Iphone (or an Android-based smartphone), you can download a really handy depth of field calculator which will show you exactly how much d-o-f you'll have with subjects at whatever distance based on the focal length and aperture stop you're using. Russ.
__________________
I shoot Canon, and use Elinchrom lights. My Flickr Page - feel free to leave comments |
|
|||
|
Very cute kiddo! His face does look a little distorted, but I'm guessing that is from the wide-angle lens. And it does look like you are looking down at him a little bit. Maybe try getting a little bit lower when taking the picture. I think it is a really cute shot though!Russ, what is the name of that app? It sounds interesting, thanks.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/teamkimberly5/ |
|
|||
|
The focal length was 55mm. Also, I looked and the ISO was 800. The general thought here seems to be that I should have gone with a wider aperture and faster shutter speed. The only problem I seem to have with a really wide Aperture is getting the whole face in focus. If the subject isn't looking at me dead on, then part of the face gets blurred.
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.
This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.
Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:
For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!
To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.
Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter: