|
|||
|
Okay, so today I found out that if you shoot at a higher F-stop you will be more in focus. Who knew? I didn't. So next question. How can you shoot low light situations and attain a sharper focus? Must you use a flash? I can't imagine that there would be any other way, but you all are smart.
I really had no idea that smaller openings gave you sharper focus...I can't believe I missed that. Dane
__________________
Canon 20D body, Canon EF-S 18-55 IS lens, Canon 50mm f1.8 II, Zeikos Battery Grip...and high expectations ![]() There is no crying in baseball - Tom Hanks |
|
||||
|
You can (1) use more light (for example a flash), (2) use a higher ISO, or (3) use a slower shutter speed.
That's why it's important to understand the exposure triangle. As you increase or decrease one of the parts (ISO, Aperture, or Shutter Speed), it effects all of the other factors as well. You can read about the exposure triangle on the DPS Blog: Learning about Exposure – The Exposure Triangle
__________________
Nikon D90 | Sony NEX-3 Nikkor 18-55 | Nikkor 70-300 | Nikkor 50 f/1.4D | Lensbaby 2.0 | Nikkor 85 f/1.8D | Nikkor 105 f/2.8 VR | Sigma 10-20 f/4-5.6 | Nikkor 10.5 f/2.8 Fisheye | Sony 16 f/2.8 | Sony 18-55 | 2xSB600 | Orbis Ring Flash Adapter My Flickr |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Using a smaller aperture (higher f-stop number) will increase the depth of field, or, in other words, what is in focus in the frame. Anything outside of the depth of field will be out of focus. On the contrary, using a larger aperture (lower f-stop number) will decrease the depth of field, minimizing what is in focus in the picture. Shooting in low light situations can be challenging. It requires a knowledge of how aperture, shutter speed, and ISO affect exposure. If this is new to you, I would kindly recommend reading this. There are links to more information in that article as well. A flash is not required to achieve an image that is in focus in low light. A lot of times, if the shot is posed, photographers will use manual focus because auto-focus sometimes struggles finding the proper focus due to poor lighting. Or, if you need the speed of auto-focus, try focusing on an area that is clearly defined and has some contrast so that the camera is not "hunting" to achieve focus. EDIT: It looks like Nicole and I linked to the same article. Oh well.
__________________
Flickr Model Mayhem - I'd love to work with you! Twitter - Follow me! facebook - Become my fan!
Last edited by natek313; 11-30-2009 at 10:29 PM. |
|
||||
|
that comes in handy for wide angles in particular. Literally, you can not not worry about focusing, as the DoF is so large, its sweet as, so you can just set the distance scale to approx (optional!) and FIRE!
Apparently NASA did this in space: used wide angles, and point and shoot it, no need for focus [remember the 60's had no(?) AF cameras]
__________________
Canon D60: 50mm f/1.8, 28-80mm f/4.5-5.6 This work by Nathan Barlow is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-No-Derivative Works 3.0 New Zealand License. Please ask before posting modified images, unless otherwise stated. |
|
|||
|
I started to type a response that explaining that I wasn't talking about exposure, I was talking about focus. Then, I set to finding examples and then I started looking at EXIF data and THEN I found out I have no idea what I am talking about. So! New question: Take a look at these two photos, both are at the same f-stop number (5.6). One looks in focus and one looks OOF. Why?
![]() 1/50 400 30mm And: ![]() 1/50 400 30mm I do appreciate your help
__________________
Canon 20D body, Canon EF-S 18-55 IS lens, Canon 50mm f1.8 II, Zeikos Battery Grip...and high expectations ![]() There is no crying in baseball - Tom Hanks |
|
||||
|
To me, it looks like the focus in the first photo fell on his shoulders and the neck line of his shirt. This was either due to the photographer not focusing properly if he/she was using manual focus, or it was due to the auto-focus, if used, being fooled. The focus in the second picture looks good to me.
The aperture, as it relates to focus, is only going to influence the depth of field. Now, there are other factors that influence the depth of field, but that's another story. The size of the aperture is virtually arbitrary if you do not focus properly.
__________________
Flickr Model Mayhem - I'd love to work with you! Twitter - Follow me! facebook - Become my fan!
Last edited by natek313; 12-01-2009 at 07:05 PM. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.
This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.
Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:
For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!
To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.
Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter: