|
||||
|
Be sure to fix your exposure as well, stock photos don't sell well on a grey background ;-)
__________________
Website: http://stuvel.eu/ Gear: EOS 350D - 10-22mm F/3.5-4.4 USM - 17-55mm F/2.8 IS USM - 70-300mm F/4-5.6 IS USM - 85mm F/1.8 USM - 60mm F/2.8 USM Macro - Speedlite 580EXII, 430EX and 430EXII [all Canon] [more gear] |
|
||||
|
You don't need a light meter for this kind of stuff. Just don't expect the in-camera meter to register as "neutral" when you're not shooting something neutral. Just set the exposure compensation to +1 or +2 stops and check your histogram.
__________________
Website: http://stuvel.eu/ Gear: EOS 350D - 10-22mm F/3.5-4.4 USM - 17-55mm F/2.8 IS USM - 70-300mm F/4-5.6 IS USM - 85mm F/1.8 USM - 60mm F/2.8 USM Macro - Speedlite 580EXII, 430EX and 430EXII [all Canon] [more gear] |
|
||||
|
It would seem that you're still not posting the full version. The photo you posted has been edited with Adobe Photoshop Elements 7.0 for Windows. I also don't think that a 1000D produces images as small as 1037x1556 pixels. Just post the CR2 file here, and we can take a really good look at what's happening.
Did you know that digital images are inherently a bit vague, and that your camera applies some sharpening when shooting JPEG? When shooting in RAW (as you seem to be doing, judging from the meta-data in the image) you have to apply some sharpening yourself.
__________________
Website: http://stuvel.eu/ Gear: EOS 350D - 10-22mm F/3.5-4.4 USM - 17-55mm F/2.8 IS USM - 70-300mm F/4-5.6 IS USM - 85mm F/1.8 USM - 60mm F/2.8 USM Macro - Speedlite 580EXII, 430EX and 430EXII [all Canon] [more gear] |
|
||||
|
to attach a file to this message, it needs to be under 734kb hence the reason why it is so small. If I can get the original image - approx 4 mb on here I would.
And alamy requires absolutely no sharpening to any images. The ones I have posted have just the in camera sharpening, but I have tested with no sharpening and in camera sharpening |
|
||||
|
ok, so I've uploaded it to my website. be warned - it's a large file so it takes a while to view on the screen
www.emmarhoades.com/images/bear.jpg |
|
||||
|
Ah, now we're talking
I think that you're right in suspecting your lens. The image quality goes down near the edges, it's most visible at the bottom left.You could see if you can borrow a better lens from someone, and try the same setup with same exposure etc. for comparison.
__________________
Website: http://stuvel.eu/ Gear: EOS 350D - 10-22mm F/3.5-4.4 USM - 17-55mm F/2.8 IS USM - 70-300mm F/4-5.6 IS USM - 85mm F/1.8 USM - 60mm F/2.8 USM Macro - Speedlite 580EXII, 430EX and 430EXII [all Canon] [more gear] |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.
This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.
Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:
For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!
To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.
Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter: