#1 (permalink)  
Old 12-06-2010, 05:37 AM
courtney23cy's Avatar
Ephesians 1:5-8
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Tehachapi, California
Posts: 59
Default How to get super crisp photo's

I'm pretty new to the SLR world, as I hope my question doesn't make painfully obvious... But here it goes anyway... I like to check out pro photographers websites for a few reasons, but mainly to try to learn by looking at what I like and don't like from others artwork. One thing I am always noticing is how much I love a super crisp and clean photo... I have yet to get this look in my own photo's. It's not that I don't get things in focus, I just don't have that glassy look to my pictures that I want SO badly. Is there something pretty basic that I'm totally missing here? Or is it the equipment? I use a Nikon D90 and mostly use my 50mm 1.4 ... Do I need to invest in some different lenses? Please help Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 12-06-2010, 05:57 AM
inkista's Avatar
Gear Geek Girl
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 9,157
Default

Most people immediately assume it's their lenses. And in part, that might be true, but a lot of it is probably technique. Your 50/1.4 is plenty sharp.

The problem is you're probably shooting with it at f/1.4 a lot. It's not at its sharpest wide-open. Most lenses perform better when stopped down one or two stops. The 50/1.4 is probably a lot sharper at f/2.8 or f/4 than it is at f/1.4.

Are you shooting at very high isos? ISO noise can make an image seem fuzzier.

Do you know how to hold your camera? A lot of folks seem to miss this vital basic.

Have you mastered your autofocus system? Are you sure the camera focused on your subject properly? With portraits, you want your subject's eyes to be in focus. Autofocus systems can be dumb and may have latched onto something other than what you wanted to be in focus. Selecting AF points and aiming at high-contrast targets (where black meets white) can help.

Is your shutter speed fast enough for handholding? (or, is your tripod stable enough?) Camera shake and subject motion blur can show up in images if your shutter speed is too slow. The rule of thumb is that your shutter speed should be at least 1/focal_length when you're shooting handheld without stabilization. With a 50mm lens, that would mean 1/50s or faster.

Do you understand depth of field? Having a very thin one (i.e., shooting at f/1.4) can make focusing issues much more critical. Stopping down can help with this.

And do you know how to post-process your images? Most folks add a bit of sharpening to their photos.

How to Take Sharp Digital Images
__________________
I shoot with a Canon 5DmkII, 50D, and S90, and Pansonic G3. flickr stream and equipment list
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 12-06-2010, 06:19 AM
HATES to type
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 247
Default

The default settings Nikon uses do not provide much in-camera sharpening. You should be able to change these, or increase sharpening in post processing. ViewNX allows you to increase sharpening before converting the .NEF file to .jpg or .tiff.

The links that inkista posted here are great: PP Sharpening (RAW)
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 12-06-2010, 06:26 AM
courtney23cy's Avatar
Ephesians 1:5-8
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Tehachapi, California
Posts: 59
Default

I usually have my ISO set at 200 should I take it down a bit further when possible?

I do get frustrated sometimes with my AF. I often have to focus and recompose. Would it be better to manually focus? Or is there a setting that gives me more options for focusing that I don't know about?

I do what I can to post process, but I admit I don't know a whole lot on the subject... I have attempted to sharpen in Photoshop CS4, but I must not be doing it right because it doesn't seem to do anything, or if it does is seems to add noise to my photo's - which is not the look I'm usually going for.

Thanks so much for your help
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 12-06-2010, 10:29 AM
LMAshton's Avatar
geek
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Singapore? Sri Lanka? Um...
Posts: 251
Default

Have you read the manual? I know, it's thick and boring, but it really does help. I have the same camera body (different lens) and I still haven't finished going through the manual yet even though I've had the camera around 10 months. Lazy butthead, me. But there's a LOT of useful information in there that will help you learn what your camera is capable of. And yes, there are other autofocus options. I'm still figuring those out myself, playing around with the various settings as I figure out what works best for me under which circumstances.

As for manual focus, depends on how good your eyes are. I'm at the point - getting old, you know? - where that's less and less of an option even with the viewfinder diopter thingie set for my eye. When I was younger, with my film SLR, I always shot with manual focus. Well, had no choice - the camera didn't have autofocus.
__________________
Laurie in Sri Lanka
Twittering * Blogging
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 12-06-2010, 12:19 PM
Friendly Astrophysicist
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Japan
Posts: 1,127
Default

If I imagine correctly what you are picturing - the "glassy look" is not just pure sharpness - it's also got a lot to do with contrast, clarity and the presence of black in the image. Increasing microcontrast (using clarity adjustment in lightroom in raw) , making sure blackpoint is set right, and having a stronger contrast can lead to it.

It will also help to make sure you don't have color casts in the image - reducing "haze" a little further. Just be careful, because too much contrast or saturation can go along way in destroying the look.
__________________
My Gear and My Flickr
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 12-06-2010, 12:31 PM
Peapod Photo's Avatar
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 131
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by courtney23cy View Post
I usually have my ISO set at 200 should I take it down a bit further when possible?

I do get frustrated sometimes with my AF. I often have to focus and recompose. Would it be better to manually focus? Or is there a setting that gives me more options for focusing that I don't know about?

I do what I can to post process, but I admit I don't know a whole lot on the subject... I have attempted to sharpen in Photoshop CS4, but I must not be doing it right because it doesn't seem to do anything, or if it does is seems to add noise to my photo's - which is not the look I'm usually going for.

Thanks so much for your help
In terms of ISO, it really depends on the lighting in the situation you're in. If you want sharp photos, you need to get used to adjusting the ISO setting that's suitable for the lighting you're in at the time.

I find that AF and MF both have a place. It kind of depends on what you're comfortable using. I often use MF when I get frustrated and my camera won't focus on exactly what I want it to. Otherwise AF can be pretty handy.

In terms of post-processing, Lightroom is your friend.
__________________
Peapod Photography
Join my Facebook page!

Canon EOS 5D Mark II | Canon EOS 60D | 24-70 f/2.8 L USM | 100 f/2.8 USM | 430EX II | ...and growing! ...all in a Crumpler 60 million dollar home!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 12-06-2010, 01:19 PM
oldwolf's Avatar
Full of useless info.
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,920
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by courtney23cy View Post
I do get frustrated sometimes with my AF. I often have to focus and recompose. Would it be better to manually focus? Or is there a setting that gives me more options for focusing that I don't know about?
Select the closest focus point to the spot you want in focus then focus and recompose that way. Don't use the center one, focusing then recomposing. The curvature of the lens will throw off your focus if you shoot this way, especially if you have a low f/stop.
__________________
-When confronted by a difficult problem, you can solve it more easily by reducing it to the question, "How would the Lone Ranger handle this?"
-I'm a vessel of useless information; just ask my wife.

-Critiques and editing of my pics for DPS always welcome-
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 12-06-2010, 01:47 PM
courtney23cy's Avatar
Ephesians 1:5-8
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Tehachapi, California
Posts: 59
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ravncat View Post
If I imagine correctly what you are picturing - the "glassy look" is not just pure sharpness - it's also got a lot to do with contrast, clarity and the presence of black in the image. Increasing microcontrast (using clarity adjustment in lightroom in raw) , making sure blackpoint is set right, and having a stronger contrast can lead to it.

It will also help to make sure you don't have color casts in the image - reducing "haze" a little further. Just be careful, because too much contrast or saturation can go along way in destroying the look.
Yes! you know what I'm talking about... and definitely there is a fine line between beautiful and too much contrast. As for the reducing haze, what do you mean "color casts"?
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 12-06-2010, 01:48 PM
courtney23cy's Avatar
Ephesians 1:5-8
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Tehachapi, California
Posts: 59
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike367 View Post
The default settings Nikon uses do not provide much in-camera sharpening. You should be able to change these, or increase sharpening in post processing. ViewNX allows you to increase sharpening before converting the .NEF file to .jpg or .tiff.

The links that inkista posted here are great: PP Sharpening (RAW)
Awesome! Thanks
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0