#1 (permalink)  
Old 06-16-2010, 02:24 PM
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 69
Default how much does light affect ISO?

i took some indoor shots last night and they were very dark and grainy. i contacted canon to get some info to be sure it wasnt a mechanical issue with my camera(ps sx 120). he said ISO should be low to prevent grain (200 or less) which i understand. i feel like the room was bright enough, so why were my shots so dark and grainy?

btw i was in manual. i am trying to learn........
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-16-2010, 02:31 PM
mrdale's Avatar
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 62
Default

If you would post a photo with EXIF info we can probably ascertain the problem.
__________________
I shoot Nikon


My flickr
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-16-2010, 02:32 PM
dPS +1000 Club
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 4,586
Default

Don't believe your eyes when it comes to light levels. Believe your camera's exposure meter (up to a point) and especially the histogram.

Without seeing your photographs. I believe they were dark and grainy because they were under exposed.

How did the histogram look?

Could you please post an example with exif info.
__________________
Flickr stream.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/34094515@N00/

500pics stream
http://500px.com/Richard_Taylor

Last edited by RichardTaylor; 06-16-2010 at 02:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-16-2010, 02:38 PM
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 69
Default

i already junked the pics b/c i hated them....plus they were nudes. my camera doesnt have a histogram. i was using 4 sources of light, all standard incandescent light bulbs. i tried using flash and that gave me crap glares. adjusting the other controls didnt change anything in the shots much either, so now i think i may be retarded (photographically challenged)......
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 06-16-2010, 02:56 PM
dPS +1000 Club
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 4,586
Default

Reshoot a "safe" subject in similar conditions and post the pics along with exif info.

Check the histogram in an editing program.

Do not be afraid to bump your ISO up if need be.
__________________
Flickr stream.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/34094515@N00/

500pics stream
http://500px.com/Richard_Taylor
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06-16-2010, 03:05 PM
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 69
Default

these were the settings i had........ i remember them pretty well and they are still stored in my cam from what i shot last night.

ISO----200
f2.8
0"4

the lights were standard bulbs from lamps in the room with no shades so the light was bright and harsh(rookie!). there were 3 lamps triangulated abut 15 feet apart with the subject in the middle. i also used the over head light, so the room was plenty light. i also tried the pop up flash and external add on flash the mounts to the tripod socket. it was VERY ghetto lighting.

i know this is vague as humanly possible..........
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 06-16-2010, 03:26 PM
dakwegmo's Avatar
I shoot people
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,981
Default

Are you using standard room lamps? If so, refer back to Richard's comments about not believing your eyes. Check your camera's meter and it will give you a good indication of whether the shot was properly exposed. In a high contrast scene if you properly expose for the highlights, you can still pick up noise/grain in the shadow areas.
__________________
[¯Ô¯] marcus
photoblog | Facebook | flickr | 5∞ px | G+
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 06-16-2010, 03:34 PM
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 69
Default

yes they were standard room lamps. the noise was pretty consistent through out the pics, even in the highlight areas. i tried correcting it in photoshop but was unsuccessful, i guess due to the severity of the pixelation. i was getting better quality photos from my 7mp kodak bridge camera!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 06-16-2010, 03:37 PM
dcclark's Avatar
Moderates the loving team
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Houghton, MI
Posts: 2,359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by themadness View Post
yes they were standard room lamps. the noise was pretty consistent through out the pics, even in the highlight areas. i tried correcting it in photoshop but was unsuccessful, i guess due to the severity of the pixelation. i was getting better quality photos from my 7mp kodak bridge camera!
Standard room lamps are DIM. Human eyes, on the other hand, are AMAZING for their ability to function so well in dim light. Your camera, sadly, is not that amazing (and no camera is good enough to be amazing in ultra-dim light).

In other words, even 4 incandescent lamps will not light a room well enough to get a good exposure. Your camera had to increase the ISO to try and keep your shutter speed reasonable, and the result was BOTH a slow shutter speed, and lots of grain from the high ISO.

It takes a lot of experience to recognize what "dim" and "bright" light really is. You have to know your equipment, and experience lots of lighting situations.
__________________
David Clark Photography, project 365 photo blog, flickr.
It is OK to edit and repost my photos on the DPS forums only.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 06-16-2010, 03:42 PM
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 69
Default

the camera was a budget decision, i am satisfied w/ quality of the images outdoors. it also has pretty decent quality indoors in auto mode. manually and priority modes are a bit lacking tho. my next step may be to go to a nikon bridge cam. my needs just dont justify a high dslr, but i do have expectations that i want met. my knowledge of manual settings is very limited. how talented do you have to be to pull of soem the incredible images i see on this forum? am i expecting too much?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0