#1 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2010, 01:30 AM
private's Avatar
Old timer :)
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: VA
Posts: 7,206
Default Focus with the 24-70 and the 50D

I think something might be wrong with my lens or camera - not sure which. I had the focus set on his face (his eyes to be exact) but when you look at the pic - the focus fell on his clothes instead. What can I do to figure out what is going on with my camera/lens...

001a
__________________
Pat
5D, 5DMKII | lenses 24-70 2.8L, 50 1.2, 35 2.0 70-200 2.8 II, 15mm - MY WEBSITE Fan me on Facebook!
You don't have to be the best, you just have to be better than last week" - Jerry Ghionis
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2010, 02:06 AM
dPS +1000 Club
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 4,588
Default

Some thoughts
Were you using autofocus?
If so what focus point did you select or were you using automatic focus point select?
Or did you focus manually & recompose and the subject or yourself moved slightly in the Z plane?

Did you have a filter on the lens that may have caused problems with focussing?
Have you tried this camera lens combination on a static flat subject like newspaper to if it will focus ok on that?

Was the same camera/lens used on the same recent portraits in your flickr stream?
They appear to be ok.
__________________
Flickr stream.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/34094515@N00/

500pics stream
http://500px.com/Richard_Taylor

Last edited by RichardTaylor; 02-15-2010 at 02:30 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2010, 02:18 AM
Samanax's Avatar
dPS +1000 Club
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kaneohe, Hawaii
Posts: 1,134
Default

The lens may be front focusing.

The 50D has the micro adjustment feature. You might want to see if it helps.
__________________
My Gear List / My Flickr
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2010, 02:26 AM
private's Avatar
Old timer :)
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: VA
Posts: 7,206
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardTaylor View Post
Some thoughts
Were you using autofocus?
If so what focus point did you select or were you using automatic focus point select?
Or did you focus manually & recompose and the subject or yourself moved slightly in the Z plane?

Did you have a filter on the lens that may have caused problems with focussing?
Have you tried this camera lens combination on a static flat subject like newspaper to if it will focus ok on that?
Yes to Auto focus, used the central focal point in manual mode. No filter (forgot the hood tho') and I will try on something that does not move
__________________
Pat
5D, 5DMKII | lenses 24-70 2.8L, 50 1.2, 35 2.0 70-200 2.8 II, 15mm - MY WEBSITE Fan me on Facebook!
You don't have to be the best, you just have to be better than last week" - Jerry Ghionis
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2010, 03:21 AM
CaptainNH's Avatar
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: ɐıןɐɹʇsnɐ 'ʎǝupʎs
Posts: 839
Default

Was this a one-off problem or is it now repeating itself? Just this lens or is it affecting others?

If it's a one-off, it's probable that one of you moved backwards a touch and you shouldn't worry about it.

If it's repeatedly front focussing, as Sanamax suggested, you can fix this up with a micro-adjustment either for this lens alone, or a global adjustment for all your lenses.
__________________
Neil
www.hargreavesphotography.com.au | Twitter | Blog | email
Canon 5D2 | Canon 50D | Canon 10D
17-40L | 24-70L | 35L | 70-200 f/2.8L IS | 100L Macro IS | 135L | 85/1.8 | Sigma 50/1.4 | Pocketwizards & other lighting stuff
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2010, 03:30 AM
private's Avatar
Old timer :)
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: VA
Posts: 7,206
Default

I've only noticed it with the 24-70 - not the 85 or the 70-200 - now that I think about it...
__________________
Pat
5D, 5DMKII | lenses 24-70 2.8L, 50 1.2, 35 2.0 70-200 2.8 II, 15mm - MY WEBSITE Fan me on Facebook!
You don't have to be the best, you just have to be better than last week" - Jerry Ghionis
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2010, 04:18 AM
sk66's Avatar
Lovable Contrarian
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 6,744
Default

I looked at the exif...lens at 35mm f/2.8....

Based upon the field of view I would guess you were not much more than 3-4 feet away. If that is accurate, the total DOF would be around 4". Any change in angle etc could be enough to shift the focus out if using the focus/recompose method. (that's why you can choose the focus point to use in spot focus, to avoid recomposing)

Still, it seems more like operator error, could be you let up on the button and it refocused, could be you weren't really in spot, could be you were in a C focus mode, could be technique (reframing, not likely), could be change in position...etc

However, if it's consistent I'd say it's a severe case of front focus.....something like 3-5 inches which is completely unacceptable. (1/3 dof in front of focus point, 2/3 behind. I'm guessing the closest element in the image is at least 6" in front of his face)

If you were further away or the focal length was really 24mm (reported as 35 effective) then it would be an even WORSE case of front focus... I hope that's not it, I've never actually heard of a case that bad... (5" would be conceivable at much longer distances and focal lengths, but not 35mm and under 20ft)
__________________
Steve
the Photographic Academy.com
My Portfolio, My Flickr, My Blog
D4, D7000, G10, 1030SW and a bunch of other stuff....

Last edited by sk66; 02-15-2010 at 04:21 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2010, 04:30 AM
private's Avatar
Old timer :)
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: VA
Posts: 7,206
Default

I was about 4 feet away and it seems to be pretty consistant..I will test more tomorrow- but when I do a session, I find that I am focusing onthe eyes and then moving down and those seem to bethe sharper pics...I have the 24-70 on my camera 95% of the time, but I have noticed that the 85mm is always 100% sharp - but expected b/c its a prime...

I really hope its user error. THAT I can deal with!
__________________
Pat
5D, 5DMKII | lenses 24-70 2.8L, 50 1.2, 35 2.0 70-200 2.8 II, 15mm - MY WEBSITE Fan me on Facebook!
You don't have to be the best, you just have to be better than last week" - Jerry Ghionis
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2010, 04:49 AM
sk66's Avatar
Lovable Contrarian
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 6,744
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by private View Post
I was about 4 feet away and it seems to be pretty consistant..I will test more tomorrow- but when I do a session, I find that I am focusing onthe eyes and then moving down and those seem to bethe sharper pics...I have the 24-70 on my camera 95% of the time, but I have noticed that the 85mm is always 100% sharp - but expected b/c its a prime...

I really hope its user error. THAT I can deal with!
Try using the focus point selection and not recomposing...it's the little button top right on the back of your camera.....
__________________
Steve
the Photographic Academy.com
My Portfolio, My Flickr, My Blog
D4, D7000, G10, 1030SW and a bunch of other stuff....
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2010, 04:20 PM
Not photogenic
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 821
Default

AF calibration on the 24-70 is known to be unusually tricky. It's possible that yours needs to be recalibrated.

Check this article by Canon's Chuck Westfall, about halfway down the article. He gives instructions on how to test if your 24-70 needs to go to Canon for recalibration or not.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0