#1 (permalink)  
Old 01-31-2010, 01:28 AM
jli's Avatar
jli jli is offline
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 55
Default shooting at parties

Two friends are having a combined birthday party tonight and they've asked me to bring my camera. I don't think they're expecting amazing art, but I thought the situation might create some interesting discussion.

There's an all-black dress code, except for the birthday girls, who'll be wearing bright colors. This should make for very interesting shots!

1. I only have the 18-55mm kit and the 50mm f/1.8 on a Canon 1000D, but I'd still I need a bag for the extra lens. I'd rather not have to carry a bag all night, especially since it's not black!

The 18-55mm would be more flexible and let me get group shots, but I'd rather use shoot with the 50mm since it'll be indoors, at night. I'm leaning towards the 50mm since I'm more confident I can get some relatively in-focus/sharp and interesting shots, and I figure someone else can take group photos with a point-and-shoot .

When you shoot casual parties (that you're also supposed to be participating in), do you carry a bag full of lenses?

2. Thinking ahead, I imagine most people wearing black might throw off the camera's meter, so I think that means I should be setting the EV compensation somewhere between -1/3 and -1, right?

Thanks,
John
__________________
John Li
J. L(eye) on flickr
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-31-2010, 06:01 PM
verb noun
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 982
Default

I use the Canon 50mm f/1.8 to shoot indoors all the time. It works really well for those low light situations. The problem is, it's effectively an 80mm lens on our cameras, so you're really limited to tight shots. You're going to have to work to get some variety; i.e., anything but close headshots.

The kit lens will be mostly unusable in low-light situations on that camera. You're probably best off leaving the bag and just taking your camera. I always travel as light as possible.

As far as metering, the camera should actually be okay at handling that, but take a few shots and double check. If the camera overcompensates for all the black yes you'll underexpose, but you may also want to overexpose to catch all the details. More important is making sure you have a good white balance setting if you're shooting jpg, color temperatures can change from room to room.
__________________
Photo This
flickr
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-02-2010, 02:29 PM
wulf's Avatar
Ninja Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 9,830
Default

How did it go?

I'd generally agree with the above. If I had to make the choice and particularly because you don't mention an off-camera flash, I'd have gone with the 50mm lens. By stepping back to get more than just headshots you get another benefit - increased distance brings greater depth of field even when the lens is wide open or approaching it.

Wulf
__________________
Wulf Forrester-Barker << Sites: blog / flickr >>
Gear: Nikon D40, Nikon AFS 18-55mm f/3.5 - 5.6G, Nikon Series E 50mm f/1.8, Nikon AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6G, Vivitar 90mm f/2.5 macro, Raynox DCR-250, Lensbaby 2.0k, SB600
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-02-2010, 08:37 PM
jli's Avatar
jli jli is offline
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 55
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BCampbell View Post
The kit lens will be mostly unusable in low-light situations on that camera. You're probably best off leaving the bag and just taking your camera. I always travel as light as possible.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wulf View Post
How did it go?
I ended up just taking the 50mm, which was a good idea. It was crowded, most people were drinking, and I wouldn't have felt totally safe with changing lens in the middle of it all .

It was a good learning experience. I was using ISO 1600 all night, typically shooting ~f/1.8 to ~f/3.2, without flash. I probably should have gone with a faster shutter and darker photos, since I had to throw out a ton of blurred shots.

I had some focus issues, as well. A very small handful came out with okay sharpness at full size. Since these were more or less just for facebook (~400x600), it wasn't so bad. But I felt like auto-focus had a pretty hard time working quickly/accurately in the low light, and there was a lot of movement, so it was tough to get sharpness. I also did a lot of focus-and-recompose, which maybe threw off the sharpness at such big apertures, but with a crowded scene, I didn't think that AF with all the points would work well.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BCampbell View Post
More important is making sure you have a good white balance setting if you're shooting jpg, color temperatures can change from room to room.
Yeah, another thing I learned . It's still my first month with an SLR, and I've always left white balance on "auto" - until I was looking through what I shot and saw 2 essentially identical photos that had completely different color casts. Though that was a tough situation, with a mix of warmer light from the living room and white fluorescent from the kitchen.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wulf View Post
I'd generally agree with the above. If I had to make the choice and particularly because you don't mention an off-camera flash, I'd have gone with the 50mm lens. By stepping back to get more than just headshots you get another benefit - increased distance brings greater depth of field even when the lens is wide open or approaching it.
Yup, I don't have any flash equipment, and I hate the look of the built-in flash.

I did have fun positioning myself farther away to get more in the scene. It was somewhat challenging because of the crowded space, and people inadvertently stepping into the frame. I should have used the opportunity to get more frame-within-a-frame shots, though!

Thanks for the suggestions!
__________________
John Li
J. L(eye) on flickr
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-02-2010, 09:07 PM
verb noun
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 982
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jli View Post
It was a good learning experience. I was using ISO 1600 all night, typically shooting ~f/1.8 to ~f/3.2, without flash. I probably should have gone with a faster shutter and darker photos, since I had to throw out a ton of blurred shots.
Sounds like you did it right to me. I'm usually shooting ISO 800 or 1600 for things like that, on a Canon 300D, and I learned to just live with the noise.

I wouldn't try to underexpose if you're planning on pulling details back out. Especially at high ISO, all you're going to do is exacerbate the noise. here's an example of what that looks like. I forgot to bump my ISO up there, and trying to get pull anything out of that just made it a mess.

Sometimes you just get what you can, for indoor, low-light shooting I tend to leave the 50mm at f/1.8 and 800 or 1600 ISO and not worry too much about it (but then I'm also usually participating in the party too...).

Quote:
I had some focus issues, as well.
Yep, this will happen in low light.

Quote:
but with a crowded scene, I didn't think that AF with all the points would work well.
It doesn't, you are better off using just the center point, especially since you are sometimes trying to catch a fleeting moment.

Quote:
I've always left white balance on "auto" - until I was looking through what I shot and saw 2 essentially identical photos that had completely different color casts.
It is kind of aggrivating. I try to take a couple practice shots first thing in the rooms I expect to be shooting in, and pick the presets that work best for each. Sometimes it's the same one, sometimes not. Of course, eventually someone's going to light some candles or turn off some lights or plug in some christmas lights -- whatever, not much you can do. Shooting in RAW to give you post processing control over WB is not a bad way to go.

Quote:
I did have fun positioning myself farther away to get more in the scene. It was somewhat challenging because of the crowded space, and people inadvertently stepping into the frame.
Yeah, one of the tougher types of shoots you can do. Personally, I find that the best shots from a casual party are usually not those that are technically the most "correct", but those that capture... something. The feel of the moment. It's important to know broadly what gear and settings are best, but I think best to at some point stop worrying about it and "feel" your shots.

But you haven't had your camera long, this is good learning and should get you going pretty quick. The first major shoot I did with my DSLR was a charity event, and the conditions were hell; high cielinged room completely surrounded by plate glass windows, with almost everything facing toward the interior. So here I am with a camera I just got, not a very good one at that, with just the kit lens, forced to shoot toward windows all night, basically into a setting sun... Oh yeah, and the gradual shift from natural light to artifical as the night went on. It was not fun, I was not happy with the results, but man I learned a lot. You can see the results here. It's not pretty. Anyway, you have to do this kind of stuff, challenge yourself, if you want to improve, so good job.
__________________
Photo This
flickr
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-04-2010, 01:21 AM
jli's Avatar
jli jli is offline
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 55
Default

Thanks for the help and encouragement!
__________________
John Li
J. L(eye) on flickr
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0