Kit lens dead; what now? Nifty Fifty or replace the kit lens?

[johassler]

So, my very old, used camera's kit lens just died (my camera bag fell off the couch onto the carpet, and I'm surprised it's dead now, but it is - I can even see where it's "not straight" which I assume is the issue).

The problem is: we're on a tight budget (recovering from being laid off and currently underemployed) so I'm pretty well limited to something under $100, and even then I'll probably have to wait a couple months.

My current thoughts are: Nifty Fifty or just straight up replacing the kit lens or maybe this lens here.

I do have another lens, Sigma 70-300mm f4-5.6DG Macro which I'm becoming more comfortable with but still do not think I'm using to good effect as yet.

Alternately, I could just go along with the lens I have until I'm able to afford some real $ for a new lens - probably in a year or so.

I primarily take portraits (family and friends) and landscape/architectural type photographs.

Any advise would be much appreciated.

[inkista]

Just me, but I'd say replace the kit lens unless you're willing to give up or pano stitch for the landscape/architecture. The 50 is a great lens, and it can do great landscapes, but it won't go particularly wide, especially on a crop body.

[momtoamiracle]

I'd agree, for landscapes get the kit lens. It won't cost you that much and it does great in outdoor settings. I would miss mine for that purpose if something happened to it.

[johassler]

That is more or less the way I was leaning, I'd guess. I hear so many positive things about the nifty fifty, and I think I would like a lens with a larger aperture, but I suspect if I can only get one (and I can), I should replace the kit lens.

Thanks for the advice, y'all!