|
|||
|
Hi guys,
I got a canon 60D. I been hunting for a good walk around lens. I saw this two len and i can't make up my mind which 1 to buy.. Could some1 pls advise me.. I got a kit lens which is 18-200mm IS 3.5/5.6 and a 50mm F1.4 USM lens which i love very much |
|
|||
|
What does walkaround mean for you? Cityscapes, people, sport? Give us more to work with.
I use a 24-70 on my 50D and 5Dmkii and love it. The 2.8 is more useful than the IS for me, but having them together in the 17-55 is very hard to ignore. If you have full frame aspirations, then look at the 24-105 or 24-70. If you are sticking with the 60D for a while, then the 17-55 would tick just about every box. Last edited by gturner; 04-13-2011 at 07:20 AM. |
|
|||
|
For me 24mm on a crop camera is not wide enough for general purpose photography. It's a great when used on a full frame camera (That's my walk around combination)
+1 on the 17-55 suggestion. (I don't own one)
__________________
Flickr stream. http://www.flickr.com/photos/34094515@N00/ 500pics stream http://500px.com/Richard_Taylor |
|
||||
|
I've used a 24-105L as a walkaround on a crop, and while it worked pretty well, there were occasions when it simply wasn't wide enough. It's a perfect match on a full frame.
The basic tradeoffs are kind of obvious. The 17-55 is a stop faster, and will be wide enough on a crop body, but has less reach and cannot make the transition to full frame if you plan to go there soon (if not soon, however, I wouldn't sweat it. It'll hold most of its value for resale quite easily. All the $1k+ lenses do). The 24-105 is only f/4 (not great for available light of moving subjects), not particularly wide on a crop, but has more reach. It's also a lot bigger, heavier, and more conspicuous, with the L build quality. My recommendation, actually, would be to look at the photos you've taken with the 18-200 with an EXIF analysis program, like ExposurePlot and see if you favor the 17-24 range, or the 55-105 range more. That's how I made my decision to get the 24-105. Looking at photos I'd taken with my 18-55, less than .3 % were taken below 24mm, and about 80% were jammed up against the 55mm end of the lens. I tended to shoot long, not wide. That's been changing of late, though.
__________________
I shoot with a Canon 5DmkII, 50D, and S90, and Pansonic G3. flickr stream and equipment list |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.
This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.
Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:
For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!
To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.
Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter: