#1 (permalink)  
Old 02-11-2011, 04:39 PM
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 121
Default Size "P" or 4x6 filter? Which one?

I would like to buy a few natural density graduated filters. Lee or the Singh-Ray ones... I am not sure which size I should buy. I would like to use them with my Canon 17-40mm f/4 lens (filter size 77mm) or I can borrow my friends Nikon 14-24mm 2.8g lens.
Which filter size should I buy? The 4x6 is twice as much...
Thanks!
__________________
Miami Wedding Photographers
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-11-2011, 10:02 PM
It is the image
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Ohio U.S.A
Posts: 699
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by haring View Post
I would like to buy a few natural density graduated filters. Lee or the Singh-Ray ones... I am not sure which size I should buy. I would like to use them with my Canon 17-40mm f/4 lens (filter size 77mm) or I can borrow my friends Nikon 14-24mm 2.8g lens.
Which filter size should I buy? The 4x6 is twice as much...
Thanks!
Crop or FF sensor?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-11-2011, 10:35 PM
Elmo's Avatar
Almost as Old as Dirt
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: North Carolina USA
Posts: 1,055
Default

The bigger the better (within reason of course 24x24 might be a tad large), but must fit holder if you are planning on using one.

I do not think sensor size has much to do with it due to the front element size of some of the crop sensor lenses.

Last edited by Elmo; 02-11-2011 at 10:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-14-2011, 11:41 PM
Krusty79's Avatar
Smart ass (_e=mc2_)
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 3,364
Default

My only experience is with the Lee 4x6 filter. I never have any problem fitting the image into my shot, but I only have the 18-55 kit lens on a crop body. If you plan to use an ultrawide lens, you might have to get the 4x6, or if you plan to use multiple filters at once, because the farther from your lens, the wider they will have to be. I don't know if that P size is going to be big enough if you're using that 14-24 Nikon.
__________________
GREG - Canon XS with 18-55 kit
flickr
flickriver
My 500px
"You can't be young forever, but you can always be immature." - Larry Andersen.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2011, 02:49 PM
OsmosisStudios's Avatar
Don't Panic
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Mississauga / Ottawa
Posts: 11,358
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elmo View Post
The bigger the better (within reason of course 24x24 might be a tad large), but must fit holder if you are planning on using one.

I do not think sensor size has much to do with it due to the front element size of some of the crop sensor lenses.
Full-frame on a wide angle lens runs the risk of vignetting/blockage: not so with the same lens at the same focal length on a crop.
__________________
I am responsible for what I say; not what you understand.
OsmosisStudios
Gear List
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2011, 05:05 PM
Elmo's Avatar
Almost as Old as Dirt
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: North Carolina USA
Posts: 1,055
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OsmosisStudios View Post
Full-frame on a wide angle lens runs the risk of vignetting/blockage: not so with the same lens at the same focal length on a crop.
If'n it don't cover the front element with room to spare you are asking for trouble, regardless of sensor size..
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2011, 06:11 PM
OsmosisStudios's Avatar
Don't Panic
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Mississauga / Ottawa
Posts: 11,358
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elmo View Post
If'n it don't cover the front element with room to spare you are asking for trouble, regardless of sensor size..
Not necessarily. On a DX (or APS-C) sensor, there are some lenses that dont need to have the entire front element for the image to still be vignette free. Not suggested, but not totally necessary
__________________
I am responsible for what I say; not what you understand.
OsmosisStudios
Gear List
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2011, 07:38 PM
Elmo's Avatar
Almost as Old as Dirt
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: North Carolina USA
Posts: 1,055
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OsmosisStudios View Post
Not necessarily. On a DX (or APS-C) sensor, there are some lenses that dont need to have the entire front element for the image to still be vignette free. Not suggested, but not totally necessary
OK here is one incidence. I have a image with flowing water and to get some water motion and a super wide depth of field I need f:22. The water flow is very narrow and framing require close up therefore focus will be near MFD. The grad line needs to be very near the edge of the frame, therefore with a small filter the edge of the filter be very near the center of the lens. What about the line across the image caused by the edge of the filter?

Next reason:. As one grows in photography lenses will likely change and possibly that will include larger front elements. Now the smaller filters become even more useless.

So why recommend something that might work on rare occasions but have a high likely hood of failing a lot more often.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2011, 08:56 PM
Krusty79's Avatar
Smart ass (_e=mc2_)
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 3,364
Default

That's a big reason why I purchased the 4x6. Now, I don't have to worry about vignetting no matter what equipment I upgrade to eventually (of course, excluding fisheye lenses).
__________________
GREG - Canon XS with 18-55 kit
flickr
flickriver
My 500px
"You can't be young forever, but you can always be immature." - Larry Andersen.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-16-2011, 12:54 AM
OsmosisStudios's Avatar
Don't Panic
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Mississauga / Ottawa
Posts: 11,358
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elmo View Post
OK here is one incidence. I have a image with flowing water and to get some water motion and a super wide depth of field I need f:22. The water flow is very narrow and framing require close up therefore focus will be near MFD. The grad line needs to be very near the edge of the frame, therefore with a small filter the edge of the filter be very near the center of the lens. What about the line across the image caused by the edge of the filter?
That's a different phenomenon than what I was referring to. I was more concerned with blockage from the mounting system, not the edge of the filter itself. Width, not length.
__________________
I am responsible for what I say; not what you understand.
OsmosisStudios
Gear List
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0