#1 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2010, 06:04 AM
Indigo November's Avatar
Honest as a brick
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,633
Default Adapter for an old Vivitar lens?

I just bought two old Vivitar lenses at Salvation Army, for $20 (combined!), nothing is wrong with them, they were supposed to be more, but the manager gave me a deal.

So, the problem is, they obviously won't mount to my Nikon D90, and I can't figure out what kind of mount they have. I need to buy an adapter, but I don't know which one.

If I post pictures of the mounts, could someone help me?

Also, could someone tell me a bit about these lenses? Any info on them at all? One is a 28mm f/2.5 "auto wide-angle", and the other is a 135mm f/2.8 "auto telephoto". Both are in very good shape, no scratches. Both have metal lens caps that just slip on and off, the cap for the 28mm has a dent in it, but if the lens was dropped, it shows no exterior damage. Both have a focus ring and an aperture ring. Neither of them have any plastic anywhere, even the grips are metal.

As for the mounts, I can post a picture later, but I will try to describe them as well as I can.
There are two metal discs, almost opposite each other on the back of the lens, one larger than the other. There are two metal pieces that slide back and forth, one sticks out further than the other. One of these metal pieces moves when you turn the aperture ring, the other closes and opens the shutter when you move it.
I can post pictures later if they would be helpful.

Could someone point me in the direction of the correct adapter for these lenses to a Nikon D90?

Thank a bunch, it's much appreciated!

-Indi
__________________
-Indigo
D90, Minolta xg-9, Petri gx-1
A bunch of glass, mostly old, manual lenses.
Flickr
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2010, 02:52 PM
Aegea's Avatar
Stressed out
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Northern Virginia, USA
Posts: 769
Default

You may want to examine the lenses closely, sometimes the mount is identified somewhere (e.g., "N" might mean Nikon, "C" might mean Canon). I'm sure there are Vivitar experts on this site who can shed more light on this. Meantime, this site may help you identify your lenses.:

SLR Lens Mount Identification Guide

Something to consider is that Nikon unfortunately has about the largest flange to sensor distance of any common DSLR, which means that adaptation of other mounts is difficult - the lens ends up too far from the sensor to get infinity focus, unless there is a lens in the adapter, which is a whole other can of worms.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/54311838@N00/
Feel free to edit and re-post my images to DPS only
Nikon D90, Nikon V1, and a variable bunch of lenses.

Last edited by Aegea; 11-21-2010 at 03:01 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2010, 06:44 PM
Indigo November's Avatar
Honest as a brick
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,633
Default

Well, I took a good look at them, and there are no marking to identify them. But looking at the link you posted, the only one that matches is the first photo, the canon FD mount. The only difference is that mine don't have the red dot.

I searched around for an adapter and I found one from a very reliable camera store in Vermont, but it doesn't have the optics in the adapter, and it clearly states that it won't allow infinity focus.
The other one I found is from a Russian place that I've never heard of. I have no idea how reliable they are, but they have the only adapter I could find, with optics. The optical adapter also doesn't specifically say whether or not it is for a Nikon F mount, it just says "Nikon mount".

Would you recommend the $30 adapter without optics or the $65 adapter with optics? Does anyone know how reliable rugift.com is?
__________________
-Indigo
D90, Minolta xg-9, Petri gx-1
A bunch of glass, mostly old, manual lenses.
Flickr
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-22-2010, 12:59 AM
Aegea's Avatar
Stressed out
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Northern Virginia, USA
Posts: 769
Default

Can't help much, I'm afraid. I think Rugift has been in business for quite a while. Some of the Russian optics are supposed to be quite good, but whether that applies to their Canon to Nikon adapter, I haven't a clue.

If you do go for the Russian one, please let us know how well it works. There are some old non-Nikon lenses that I'd like to try
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/54311838@N00/
Feel free to edit and re-post my images to DPS only
Nikon D90, Nikon V1, and a variable bunch of lenses.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-22-2010, 02:01 AM
inkista's Avatar
Gear Geek Girl
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 9,157
Default

I think rugift is ok, I remember some folks on dpreview buying the cheap Russian tilt-shifts from three or four years ago, but I'd double-check on resellerratings and by doing a google on them, first, before buying anything.

If it were, me, I'd probably go for an adapter with glass in it (or find one with glass on eBay). The Canon FD mount isn't even adaptable on Canon EOS these days, so the distance difference between it and Nikon F is pretty big, and that adapter is going to act like an extension tube. Unless you're adapting a macro lens, chances are good you want that glass element.

Unfortunately, it's going to act like a cheap teleconverter. You're going to lose sharpness, max. aperture, and gain a little on focal length. For the most part, it may not be worth it, unless you really can't afford glass any other way. The only mount that can adapt FD lenses with simple rings are the large-sensor compact mounts: Sony NEX (E-mount) and micro four-thirds.

Also, when using a manual focus lens like this with an adapter, there are a few other stumbling blocks: you won't have metering. You won't have autofocus. You'll have empty EXIF fields for the focal length and aperture and other lens information. And you won't have aperture control from the camera body (you have to use the ring on the lens). This means you can only shoot in M or A modes. If you're ok with all this, I'd say go for it.

Just my personal feeling, but going for an old manual focus Nikon AI or AI-S lens would have been a better choice.
__________________
I shoot with a Canon 5DmkII, 50D, and S90, and Pansonic G3. flickr stream and equipment list
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0