Nikon 24-70 f/2.8 vs 28-70 f/2.8

[Ryan DS]

Been wanting to get the 24-70 for awhile now but I've come across the older 28-70 version in excellent used condition for about $700 less than the 24-70.

Is the 24-70 worth the extra money? Any noticeable differences in image quality/sharpness/colors/etc?

Just looking for some advice for anyone that's had experience with either (or both) of these lenses. Thanks.

[candleman]

$700 is allot of money.... personally.. having used a Nikkor 24-70 ...i'd go with the older one.

no i havn't used the 28-70 (diddnt even know about an old nikkor 28-70) but it its Nikon, and f/2.8 i'll boldly say i doubt you'll be dissapointed.

i know what I'd do if i could save $700

the new 24-70 is AF-S so will be faster.. my assumption is that the 28-70 will be AF-D so will use your internal focus motor in the camera.

which leads me to the next point... just be sure your camera body has the motor

[kirbinster]

If you can save that much money go for it.

[jdepould]

From what I've read, the overriding difference between the two is size and weight. Image quality is close.