85mm f/1.8 vs 70-200mm f/2.8 IS lens

[Gonska]

Hello all,

I'm (serious hobby photographer) using a D40X 18-200mm for location portrait shooting. Some photographers told me that I should upgrade to a 85mm 1.8 lens and others felt strongly about the 70-200mm f/2.8 IS lens instead. I'd love to hear your feedback on these lenses and since both lenses are expensive - I'm wondering if there is a more economic version that would still be an upgrade to the the lens I currently have - maybe the 50mm 1.8?

Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you so much for your time.

Gonska

[mk12mod]

I can't comment on the two lenses in particular that you are looking at; however, the 50mm f/1.8 I have is just a dandy of a lens that can handle a wide variety of shooting scenarios.

[OsmosisStudios]

The reason they suggest those lenses is a mix of focal length and fast aperture. That combination usually means pricy.

THe 70-200 f/2.8 VR might be a bit out of your price range: It's a VERY expensive lens. But there is no alternative.

THe 85mm f/1.8 is considerably cheaper, and it's probably your best bet. Here;s the catch: it won't autofocus on your D40x.

[Gonska]

Thanks guys for your feedback!