#1 (permalink)  
Old 11-09-2009, 01:17 PM
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 5
Question focusing with Canon 450D

IMG_5910
Exposure: 0.013 sec (1/80)
Aperture: f/14.0
Focal Length: 55 mm
Exposure: 0.00

There are 2 problems with this photo (that I think anyway). Please ignore composition and lighting etc - im trying to concentrate on a larger issue here!.

Firstly, at ISO200 I think the image is a little too grainy. I realise that Im not shooting with a 5DmkII here but I would expect better performance ?!! Please correct me if Im wrong.

Secondly, and more importantly to me, I think the focusing is off in this image (and many others like it). I took the shot a couple of weekends ago using manual focus points (focused on the "Babcock Rail" logo on the hi-vis). I tried stopping down (or is it up?!) to F14 to try and force a larger DOF and therefore hopefully bring the logo into focus. This didn't seem to have any effect and when zoomed in on the photo it still appears to be out of focus.

I guess my question is, is this my fault (camera shake, bad habits etc) or is it more of an equipment fault (possibly poor lens, faulty body etc). I have a 50mm Prime that produces much better focusing so Im thinking it may be the lens ?

Many thanks for any critique - I really want to get to the bottom of this !!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-09-2009, 01:37 PM
sybren's Avatar
dPS +1000 Club
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Posts: 1,318
Default

If it's the kit lens you're shooting with, I can imagine that it gets a little soft at the extrema of its zoom range. Try what happens at 35mm. A too small aperture (like F/16 or maybe higher) will result in softer photos as well, as the diffraction effect starts to show.
__________________
Website: http://stuvel.eu/

Gear: All Canon: EOS 7D • EOS 350D • 10-22mm F/3.5-4.4 USM • 17-55mm F/2.8 IS USM • 70-300mm F/4-5.6 IS USM • 85mm F/1.8 USM • 60mm F/2.8 USM Macro • Speedlite 580EXII, 430EX and 430EXII
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-09-2009, 03:50 PM
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 5
Default

it was the kit lens on this occasion yes. Im pretty sure I tried it at a variety of focal lengths and also at larger apertures but still had the same issue
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-09-2009, 04:25 PM
sybren's Avatar
dPS +1000 Club
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Posts: 1,318
Default

I don't think the kit lens has a larger aperture than f/5.6 at 55mm. Please note the difference between "aperture" (the hole itself) and "aperture number" (the ratio between the focal distance and the diameter of the aperture).

You can determine whether it's a focusing issue (as you seem to suggest in the thread title) or something else, but that requires a more controlled environment. Try setting up your camera at home on a tripod. Place it in front of a table, with the lens just above the table surface. Aim it at some clearly recognisable point at the middle of the table. Now aim the central focus point on that point, auto-focus and shoot. Now you can check the photo on a computer and see whether the point is in focus, or whether the focus lies in front of or behind the point you focussed on.

If it's not a focusing issue your entire photo will be blurry/soft. If it is a focusing issue, something will be in focus.
__________________
Website: http://stuvel.eu/

Gear: All Canon: EOS 7D • EOS 350D • 10-22mm F/3.5-4.4 USM • 17-55mm F/2.8 IS USM • 70-300mm F/4-5.6 IS USM • 85mm F/1.8 USM • 60mm F/2.8 USM Macro • Speedlite 580EXII, 430EX and 430EXII
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-09-2009, 04:28 PM
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 5
Default

the kit lens goes from 3.5 to 5.6. Cant remember exactly where 5.6 kicks in but its around the 28mm region i think. Agreed I need to setup a test environment. That was my next step tbh. Thanks though.

Any more thoughts would be appreciated, ta
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-09-2009, 05:31 PM
sybren's Avatar
dPS +1000 Club
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Posts: 1,318
Default

Yeah, that's what I thought. That means no larger aperture than f/5.6 at 55mm. Larger aperture number for sure, but not larger aperture.
__________________
Website: http://stuvel.eu/

Gear: All Canon: EOS 7D • EOS 350D • 10-22mm F/3.5-4.4 USM • 17-55mm F/2.8 IS USM • 70-300mm F/4-5.6 IS USM • 85mm F/1.8 USM • 60mm F/2.8 USM Macro • Speedlite 580EXII, 430EX and 430EXII
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0