#1 (permalink)  
Old 02-17-2009, 08:42 PM
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Saint Paul, MN
Posts: 27
Default 1050SW...Should I?

Hi All- I haven't posted here for I while, but I've been looking at a new camera and knew this was the place to go.

I've been looking at the Olympus 1050SW and have been seriously considering buying it. However, when I was speaking with my camera guy at the shop today, he said that the photo quality is not the greatest. I currently have a Canon A520 (new in 2005) and a Canon XSi. My XSi is my main camera, but I still would like to have a P&S for convenience. My A520 is starting to get a little slow and would like to have something a bit newer and smaller. I love the quality of the A520 and it has rarely let me down in quality of photos. I am going on vacation to Mexico next week and would really like the waterproof features of the 1050, but I'm wondering if I want to compromise that for the quality of the A520.

Please help me. I'm pretty torn right now on what I should do. Money is not really an issue and that's not what would sway my decision either way at this point.

Thanks in advance everyone!
__________________
Canon XSi, Canon 18-55 IS (Kit Lens), Canon 50mm f/1.8
Canon A520
My flickr
OK to re-edit and repost my shots on dps
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2009, 12:28 PM
big jc's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ma, USA
Posts: 93
Default

I bought the 1030sw last week for my wife. I haven't had a lot of time to play with it but from what I have taken with it turn out very good for a point and shoot. The camera does have a limited zoom range. I am going to post a review of the camera in a few weeks if you can wait.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2009, 09:29 PM
inkista's Avatar
Gear Geek Girl
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 8,622
Default

Go to Mexico in May and get the Canon D10. Not useful, I know.

I hate to say it, but I'd actually advocate getting a disposable waterproof camera this round, and wait. This is the year that everybody's releasing a waterproof/shockproof model into their P&S lineups, and there's actual competition going so that you aren't locked into looking at just the Olympus models. Keep an eye on dpreview. So far, Canon and Fuji have both announced waterproof P&Ses, and between now and PMA there are likely to be one or two more.
__________________
I shoot with a Canon 5DmkII, 50D, and S90, and Pansonic G3. flickr stream and equipment list
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2009, 11:13 PM
JerInTheBox's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 449
Default

My roommate had a waterproof Olympus, not sure what the model number was. Anyway, it's only good to like 3 feet, and it broke the first time we put it through any kind of abuse on a pretty light day of surfing. While it lasted the image quality was nothing impressive.

In short, it sucks. Just get a little disposable for the water shots and take a better camera for everything else.
__________________
My Photos
My Job
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-23-2009, 02:21 AM
Not photogenic
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 749
Default

You might consider the 1030SW or one of the new models instead. They're waterproof to 10 feet instead of 3, have more impact resistance and are crush-resistant.

The image quality of any small-sensor digicam is going to be inferior to what you get with your DSLR. After all, that's why people buy DSLRs.

The main limitation of the Oly is at higher ISOs. If you keep the ISO down to 80 or 100, you'll get reasonably good results. The thing is, there's only one mode on these cameras that lets you control the ISO, and that's the Programmed Exposure mode (the camera icon). If you go to any other mode, the camera loves to crank the ISO up to 400 or beyond, making the 1/2.3" sensor produce a ton of noise which the camera tries to reduce but mainly ends up softening the photos.

You won't get DSLR-quality pictures out of this or any other small-sensor digicam. What you will get is photos in places you wouldn't take your DSLR. And if you pay attention to your ISO setting, you should get quite reasonable results.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0