#21 (permalink)  
Old 10-22-2009, 10:56 PM
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: San José, Costa Rica
Posts: 14
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OsmosisStudios View Post

[...]
Practically, all you need to know is whether your camera is FX or DX. Your D5000 is DX, so any focal length (ANY!) you see has to be multiplied by x1.5 to give you the equivalent field of view. This is really only of value if youre comparing shots from a DX camera and an FX camera using different lens.

So does this mean that if I get a 35mm for my D5000, it will be roughly the equivalent of a 50mm on a full frame?

I'm trying to decide whether I should get a 35mm or a 50mm. If a 35mm will be roughly equivalent to a 50, I'd rather get the 35 at half the price, since apparently the only AF-S 50mm lens for a D5000 costs around $500, which is out of my budget right now.

Still learning the ropes...

Thanks!!
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 10-23-2009, 12:10 AM
dcclark's Avatar
Moderates the loving team
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Houghton, MI
Posts: 2,359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpschlosser View Post
So does this mean that if I get a 35mm for my D5000, it will be roughly the equivalent of a 50mm on a full frame?

I'm trying to decide whether I should get a 35mm or a 50mm. If a 35mm will be roughly equivalent to a 50, I'd rather get the 35 at half the price, since apparently the only AF-S 50mm lens for a D5000 costs around $500, which is out of my budget right now.

Still learning the ropes...

Thanks!!
Correct. 35 x 1.5 = 52.5, so it's about the same as a 50mm. The new 35mm f/1.8 is excellent by all accounts.
__________________
David Clark Photography, project 365 photo blog, flickr.
It is OK to edit and repost my photos on the DPS forums only.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 10-23-2009, 02:22 AM
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: San José, Costa Rica
Posts: 14
Default

Thanks, I'll use my 18-55mm at 35 and 50 to see which I like better to help my decision in buying a prime.

Once I decide that, it will be between a 35 or 50 and a 55-200 zoom... decisions, decisions.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 10-23-2009, 03:29 AM
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: San José, Costa Rica
Posts: 14
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dcclark View Post
Correct. 35 x 1.5 = 52.5, so it's about the same as a 50mm. The new 35mm f/1.8 is excellent by all accounts.
Follow-up question: the 35mm I'm looking at says it's "DX". Does that make a difference? I.E. is this lens designed for the DX sensor, and so it's an actual 35mm, and not a 50mm equivalent?

Thanks a lot.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 10-23-2009, 03:41 AM
OsmosisStudios's Avatar
Don't Panic
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Mississauga / Ottawa
Posts: 11,358
Default

DX just means that the lens is designed to only cover the DX sensor size. If used on an FX or film camera it would have dark/black corners.
__________________
I am responsible for what I say; not what you understand.
OsmosisStudios
Gear List
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 10-23-2009, 11:50 AM
vandergus's Avatar
Person
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Posts: 1,088
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpschlosser View Post
Follow-up question: the 35mm I'm looking at says it's "DX". Does that make a difference? I.E. is this lens designed for the DX sensor, and so it's an actual 35mm, and not a 50mm equivalent?

Thanks a lot.
Osmosis, this is why we bother correcting statements like this.

jp, focal length is a property of the lens (not a measure of the field of view) and will not change regardless of what camera the lens is mounted on. Field of view is determined by the combination of the focal length of the lens and the size of the sensor/film of the camera. So a 35mm DX lens and a 35mm FX lens will have the same field of view when mounted on a DX camera.
__________________
flickr
Why I Like Photographs

"It's more expensive, but it lets me adjust really specific settings that most people don't notice or think about." - Abed
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 10-24-2009, 06:53 AM
Almond.Butterscotch's Avatar
I love me some purple.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Boston,MA / Houston,TX
Posts: 706
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vandergus View Post
Osmosis, this is why we bother correcting statements like this.
Actually, this is exactly the reason why I said what I said in the other thread. It's a confusing topic to those of us who've only ever had limited experience with film.
__________________
Almond Butterscotch
The Almond Tree
Facebook Page
My Gear
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 10-25-2009, 05:24 PM
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2
Default

I think the best thing is to stick to plain english. Crop is selecting a portion of the photo- basically you are "cutting out" a part to keep and a there remains a part to discard. Magnification "enlarges" an object - crop does not "magnify". Think as "crop" in terms of "angle of vision" -something like blinders on a horse. Spread open the blinders - the horse sees more from left to right. Force the blinders closer together and the horse sees less of the panorama from left to right. There is no magnification because of the blinders nor their position -open or closed.
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 10-26-2009, 04:38 AM
OsmosisStudios's Avatar
Don't Panic
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Mississauga / Ottawa
Posts: 11,358
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ARMONDJG View Post
I think the best thing is to stick to plain english. Crop is selecting a portion of the photo- basically you are "cutting out" a part to keep and a there remains a part to discard. Magnification "enlarges" an object - crop does not "magnify". Think as "crop" in terms of "angle of vision" -something like blinders on a horse. Spread open the blinders - the horse sees more from left to right. Force the blinders closer together and the horse sees less of the panorama from left to right. There is no magnification because of the blinders nor their position -open or closed.
Very true, hence the term "crop factor". However, the cropping that is being done alters, as you say, the field of view. In practical terms, FoV and focal length are intrinsically connected. Thus sprang the idea of a crop factor multiplying your focal length.
__________________
I am responsible for what I say; not what you understand.
OsmosisStudios
Gear List
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0