Close
Close
  1. #1
    Beautiful_chaos's Avatar
    Beautiful_chaos is offline I'm new here!
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    South Texas
    Posts
    10

    Default A good macro lens?

    I have a Nikon D7000 and I'm looking into buying a macro lens for it, but I have no idea what to even consider buying. Everything seems to have mixed reviews. I've looked at photos people have taken using a few different ones and a lot of the pictures seem to have poor image quality. You can't exactly tell online if it's the lens or the eperience/inexperience of the person.
    Right now I use my Nikon Coolpix L110 for macro shots. It takes great photos. I can get right up on anything. I've even taken photos of water droplets on the lens itself (not the best thing to be doing, i know) I just get tired of having to carry them both around and switch out constantly.

    So, does anyone know or use a macro lens that works well?

    Please and Thank you for any help!

  2. #2
    OsmosisStudios's Avatar
    OsmosisStudios is offline Don't Panic
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Toronto / Ottawa
    Posts
    12,915

    Default

    I dont know where youve been looking for samples, but all Nikon's macro lenses are probably their best in terms of IQ. Depending on what you're looking for, you've got several options.

    40mm f/2.8
    60mm f/2.8 (AF-S and AF-D)
    85mm f/3.5 VR DX
    105mm f/2.8 VR
    200mm f/4 (older, and likely not available new).

    What do you plan on shooting? That'll be the biggest factor; some subjects need longer working distances so you'll want longer focal lengths. I've tried the 40, 60, and 85; I have the 40 because I dont do macro particularly seriously and dont need anything in particular from it.
    I am responsible for what I say; not what you understand.
    adammontpetit.com
    Gear List
    500PX | Graphic Design

  3. #3
    KevRev123 is offline Bacon and Bubbles
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    114

    Default


    Shooo Fly by niXerKG, on Flickr

    For me I chose the Nikon AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED N.

    I don't know where you're getting the mixed reviews because Nikon of all companies make awesome macro lenses due to their experience making microscope lenses.

    Either way I chose the 105mm because I needed as much working distance as possible for capturing bugs and I like the focal length on DX for portraits. If I were really into macro work I'd get a 200mm f/4 or if I was shooting stationary objects a bellows system.

    Another factor to look at is price. The 105mm is not relatively cheap.

    If you don't see yourself doing bugs often and just want to do a lot of close up work then the 40mm, 60mm is right up your alley.

    You can even look for deals on older AF-D/AI(S) (Manual Focus) lenses since most macro work is done in manual focus anyways. If you do go the, AI/AIS, route make sure you get one that does 1:1 life-size reproduction ratio.

    More importantly is light, a dedicated macro flash system is not cheap so you may want to pick up a flash if you don't have one that you can at least use with CLS (SB-600, SB-700, SB-800, SB-900, SB-910).

    The only 3rd party alternative I will recommend is the Tokina 100mm. Their build quality is about the same as Nikon and their optics are decent. They also were founded by former Nikon engineers. There is also the Tamron 90mm which have optics that are on par with Nikon but their build quality is really cheap.

    Or if you have any kit zooms like the 55-200mm or 55-300mm you can just mess with diopters like the Raynox DCR250.

    Your final option is to upgrade your P&S to a P7000. I love it as a companion to my D7000 and it can even use my SB-700.

    It's MF and macro abilities are cool and give you an "ant view":

    Lego View by niXerKG, on Flickr
    My Website: OMGSquirrel | Flickr | Gear: D3, Df, Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 UMC AE IF-ED, AF-S Nikkor 35mm f/1.4G, AF-S Nikkor 50mm f/1.8G, AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G IF-ED, SB-700, SB-600, Manfrotto 055CXPRO3, Induro PHQ1

  4. #4
    mbrobich's Avatar
    mbrobich is offline Moments in my life !
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    201

    Default

    I got the Sigma 60mm F2.0 Macro. It also doubles as a perfect portrait lens. The reason the 60mm is so good is because it equates the 85mm lenses on a full frame FX camera body like the D3 or D700(same focal length). Price was very good too !

    It is a little slower, but speed is not needed for macro or portraits.

    DSC_2336

    DSC_2328

    series of 5 more
    Splash_4  D7000
    Last edited by mbrobich; 03-04-2012 at 11:44 PM.
    Nikon D7000-AA filter removed, Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8, Sigma 50-150 OS f/2.8, Nikkor 300mm f/4, 2x SB600, Tokina 10-17mm fisheye.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    4

    Default

    I use a Sigma 105 2.8 macro. I got a great deal on it used on CL. I would recommend it. It's a tad soft wide open, but a great lens and can usually be found for a pretty good deal. It also doubles as a decent portrait lens.

  6. #6
    sk66's Avatar
    sk66 is online now Lovable Contrarian
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Harrisburg, PA
    Posts
    14,570

    Default

    For true macro I use the sigma 150mm f/2.8. A longer lens allows a longer working distance which can be a huge plus when doing true macro...Otherwise I prefer my G10 P&S.

  7. #7
    shocellist's Avatar
    shocellist is offline 金本健
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    CA, USA
    Posts
    765

    Default

    I also use the Sigma 150mm f/2.8 (did they discontinue this lens?), but for Canon.
    My flickr photostream

    Canon XTi, Canon 5D Mark II
    18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 (EF-S), 50mm f/1.8 II, Sigma 150mm f/4 Macro, 24-105mm f/4 L, 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6 L IS

  8. #8
    Almond.Butterscotch's Avatar
    Almond.Butterscotch is offline I love me some Purple.
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    New London, CT
    Posts
    760

    Default

    I've used both the 60mm f/2.8G, the 85mm DX, and the 105mm VR. They're all absolutely fantastic pieces of glass. I'd venture the 60mm is the sharpest, but I much preferred the overall meatiness of the 105mm. The 85mm isn't much of a long-term investment 'cause if you ever go full-frame (FX), it'll vignette strongly in the corners.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Log in

Log in