11-15-2011, 12:05 AM #1
Nikon D3000 and real estate photography
I've recently started working as a real-estate photographer in New South Wales, and have had to buy a heap of gear. I've bought a new lens, tripod, camera bag, flash... lots of lovely toys Not once did I question whether or not I'd need to get a new camera body!
Recently, however, I posted to the franchise's forum asking what the other photographers thought I should get in terms of my lens and flash, and mentioned that I'd be working off a D3000. Long ago someone told me that money is best spent on lenses, and I thought that if I got a decent enough lens, my D3000 would be ok. I know it's not a pro camera, but it has served me well and frankly, I cant afford a new one at this point. One of the photographers wrote back to me saying "A D3000, eeeeeeeek! you'll need a better camera for this."
This made me a bit nervous, as after all my other recent purchases a new camera really isn't an option. I have also learned to take camera advice with a pinch of salt, in my experience there is a great deal of camera snobbery in the world of photography. While I appreciate that some of the pro cameras are amazing and would love to upgrade one day, I still think my D3000 should be fine. Everything will be HDRed, which allows for a bit of error I think.
What do you guys think? Am I being naive? I would love some advice on this, as I was so excited to get going and now I'm a little nervous that my equipment wont be up to scratch.
* I've attached a couple of examples of what I'll be doing, pics I took for my portfolio
11-15-2011, 12:19 AM #2
I'm not a professional photographer, but I would say your initial assumptions are right: you'll be fine for now with the D3000 and a great lens. Personally, I always cringe when I see the word HDR, because I expect to see an overdone, "artsy", over-saturated photo. Yours, on the other hand, I think are exceptionally well done.
11-21-2011, 12:58 AM #3
I could not tell that they have been retouched which is a good thing.D7100 D90 SB-910,SB-900
DX AF-S 35 mm 1:1.8 G DX 50 mm 1:1:4
DX AF-S 18-105 mm1:3.5-5.6 G ED
AF-S 70-300 mm 1:4.5-5.6 G
AF-S Micro 105 1:2.8 G ED
11-21-2011, 09:51 PM #4Mike
The quality of picture is depend on you
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Seattle, Wa
The few advantages of a pro camera in that setting (indoors, controlled light, low iso, tripod) would be in camera bracketing, external flash control, and more resolution. High iso performance is moot, better af likewise, given the subject manual focus would work.
If the pictures are just to be viewed online; or printed in flyers, brochures etc resolution shouldn't be a problem either.
11-24-2011, 10:51 PM #5
Those images are great - focus is spot on, DOF is great, everything is pin sharp, exposure, colour and saturation are good. There's a whole lot of snobbery around the internet about the camera body you own, what's a pro camera and all that. A pro camera is one that gets you the images you want and earns you a living. This often has much more to do with the photographer than the camera. There are lots of 'gear-heads' around with fancy so-called 'pro' equipment who can't shoot a decent photo. If your D3000 is giving you the images you want, and it's not holding you back, then there's no need to upgrade. The time to upgrade is when your current body isn't giving you what you really need, and a better one offers what it's lacking.
Ignore ccting's comments above - he doesn't know what he's talking about - all Nikon DX sensors are 24mm x 16mm, and all of them can do big prints! I used to have a D700 (12MP) and have printed 36" x 24" prints. My current D7000 (16.2 MP) can print even bigger. The D3000's ISO performance isn't holding you back either - neither of those photos shows any indication of high ISO noise.
Have faith in your current gear - it's doing the job you need and your work is great. Keep it up!
PS You have some great images in your 500px gallery too!
Last edited by gfinlayson; 11-24-2011 at 11:38 PM. Reason: SpellingNikon D7000, Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8, Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8, Samyang 35mm f/1.4, Nikon 80-200mm f/2.8 AF-S, Nikon 85mm f/1.8 AF-D, Tamron 180mm f/3.5 Macro, Sigma 500mm f/4.5, SB-800 x 3.
11-24-2011, 11:25 PM #6
11-25-2011, 02:47 AM #7
Second: if "your clients" are judging you on the list of gear you present them and not on a portfolio, that's not a client I'd want. That's just stupid, and, from experience, not the case. Again, you're talking out your ass.
Have you ever dealt with actual paying clients? have you ever sat down with a client to go over a project? Have you ever had to present a portfolio to a client? What about a list of equipment?
Im gonna guess the answer to that is no. An emphatic no.
Your giant post doesn't actually SAY anything. It's just a lot of words. If you want to make a point, make it.
11-25-2011, 03:30 AM #8
@ccting-You have no idea what you're talking about!
You continually spout off misquoted and completely fabricated information like it's the gospel truth. You've owned a camera for a few months and all of the sudden you know how to run a photography business? You've said repeatedly that you're a total newbie and that you have a D5100, yet you're telling the OP that a client requires professional equipment? So when exactly did you start running a successful photography business? Exactly.
I know you're loving all the ebooks you're reading, and idolizing Ken Rockwell's site, and that's great. Hang onto the enthusiasm. And by all means, ask questions and post photos for critique. But stop giving out misinformation like you're some kind of photography genius. All you're doing is making yourself sound completely ignorant, and driving the rest of us crazy.
And just an FYI, I believe you were trying to quote Porter's Five Forces Model, which never says identify your enemy. It's about strengthening the core competencies of your own business to remain competitive. And it's completely irrelevant to the OP.
11-25-2011, 03:34 AM #9
Short circuit in my brain... send for repair... for 1 month...
Sry, i gain two permanent head damages before...
Last edited by ccting; 11-25-2011 at 03:45 AM.
11-28-2011, 07:48 AM #10
Thanks for the advice everyone!
I didn't check the forum for a while so I missed all the drama and didn't see ccting's original reply so I'm a bit lost in that respect... lol
Anyways, I'm sure it doesn't matter, I'm thrilled most of you think my d3000 should be good enough. That said, I recently had a look at some D7000 reviews and am a bit like a school girl giggling over a Justin Beiber poster... except it's a camera. And it doesn't have silly hair...
I guess my Christmas wish list just got a bit longer!
Luckily the d3000 will do for now
See ya and thanks again for the advice!