#1 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2010, 01:05 PM
Bobalongwhale's Avatar
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: London
Posts: 5
Default Why does 200mm on my Sigma does not go as far as my Nikkor's?

Hello

Although I would call myself a keen amateur, I have to admit I do no know much about the maths behind focal length.

I have just bought a Sigma DC 18-200 lens and I notice that at 200mm it does not zoom as close as with my Nikkor 55-200. My camera is a Nikon D300s.

Can someone explain to me why that is?

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2010, 01:29 PM
vandergus's Avatar
Person
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Posts: 1,088
Default

My guess is a phenomenon called "focus breathing". When lens manufacturer's specify the focal length of a lens, it is always at infinity focus. As you focus at closer distances, the focal length may change so at the nearest focusing distances the lens may have an actual focal length of 175mm, or something like that. It's a compromise that is often made in lenses with large zoom ranges (like your 18-200mm) and/or lenses that are internally focused. I know that a lot of Nikonians were upset with the latest 70-200mm f2.8 redesign because it is significantly less than 200mm at the closest focusing distances. Your 55-200mm probably exhibits less focus breathing because it has a smaller zoom range and has a less complex design.
__________________
flickr
Why I Like Photographs

"It's more expensive, but it lets me adjust really specific settings that most people don't notice or think about." - Abed
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2010, 02:17 PM
OsmosisStudios's Avatar
Don't Panic
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Mississauga / Ottawa
Posts: 11,358
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vandergus View Post
My guess is a phenomenon called "focus breathing". When lens manufacturer's specify the focal length of a lens, it is always at infinity focus. As you focus at closer distances, the focal length may change so at the nearest focusing distances the lens may have an actual focal length of 175mm, or something like that. It's a compromise that is often made in lenses with large zoom ranges (like your 18-200mm) and/or lenses that are internally focused. I know that a lot of Nikonians were upset with the latest 70-200mm f2.8 redesign because it is significantly less than 200mm at the closest focusing distances. Your 55-200mm probably exhibits less focus breathing because it has a smaller zoom range and has a less complex design.
This. Most superzooms breathe rather heavily.
__________________
I am responsible for what I say; not what you understand.
OsmosisStudios
Gear List
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2010, 02:24 PM
Aegea's Avatar
Stressed out
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Northern Virginia, USA
Posts: 769
Default

Indeed. I tested a Sigma 150-500 and found it had an effective maximum FL of 430mm at 20 feet.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/54311838@N00/
Feel free to edit and re-post my images to DPS only
Nikon D90, Nikon V1, and a variable bunch of lenses.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2010, 02:41 PM
dPS +1000 Club
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,863
Default

Either that or the dude in Sigma factory has been trying to convert 6 inches into mm to impress a colleague
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2010, 11:04 PM
Friendly Astrophysicist
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Japan
Posts: 1,127
Default

The nikon 18-200 gets down to 135 or so at very close distances,

as stated above, the focal lengths are written for focus at infinity.
__________________
My Gear and My Flickr

Last edited by ravncat; 11-12-2010 at 06:24 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 11-17-2010, 03:33 PM
TheEagleSpirit's Avatar
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Terre Haute, Indiana
Posts: 256
Default

I love my Nikkor f-2.8 70-200 VRII lense.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 11-17-2010, 04:43 PM
OsmosisStudios's Avatar
Don't Panic
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Mississauga / Ottawa
Posts: 11,358
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheEagleSpirit View Post
I love my Nikkor f-2.8 70-200 VRII lense.
Thanks but thats only slightly relevevant: the 70-200 f/2.8VRII has some significant breathing issues - so much so that many pros are using x1.4 or x2 teleconverters on them to get the focal length they want and need
__________________
I am responsible for what I say; not what you understand.
OsmosisStudios
Gear List
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0