D300s VS D700

[demon]

I mostly shoot images destined for the web. I have a D80 right now with a 24-105 and a 70-300. I really like the idea of having the ability to do video with the D300s but wonder if the D700 produces better images with it's larger sensor.

Anyone have feedback on the differences? I am also concerned that the D700 may about to be phased out in favor of a bigger meaner stronger version (and I bought my D80 three weeks before the D90 came out!)

Thanks in advance for any insight!

[Almond.Butterscotch]

24-105? As best I know, that's a Canon lens. Nikon's site doesn't list a 24-105.

Well, how much do you like your extra telephoto reach brought from the cropped sensor? Also, know that non-DX lenses will cost more if/when you decide to get another lens.

[dakwegmo]

If you're shooting for the web, you really don't need a D700. You proably don't eveb need a D300sr. The difference in image quality for images sized for the web will be largely indistinguishable from the camera you already have. About the only thing you'll gain with either of those is high ISO performance, but you can get that plus video from the D90. Though I wouldn't rely on either the D90 or the D300s for video. Both cameras have a maximum file size of 2GB and video length of 5 minutes. Plus video image quality isn't that great compared to even low end camcorders. It's a nice feature to play, but at this stage it's just a gimmick.

[OsmosisStudios]

If you're shooting for web (presumably less than 1600px on the long side) then you won't see a difference between a D300s or a D700.

[sk66]

IMO, it doesn't matter so much where the images will end up, but rather the type of shooting you do.

High ISO noise shows up les in smaller image sizes, but it can still be a problem. If you want very low light capability, D700

If you shoot wildlife/sports, the crop sensor is your friend. D300 for it's better focus/metering system.

If you need high FPS max durability/weather resistance/grip/ etc etc. Neither, D3

If none of the above apply, keep your current camera.

[kirbinster]

I would save my money and not buy either. For what you want to do why not get a D90 and then invest in some better lenses. Sure you might need higher ISO capility with your slow glass, but if you get faster glass you might not really need it. It is always better to invest in good glass than bodies, as you have pointed out you never know when the next "better" body will make yours seem old.

[OsmosisStudios]

Originally Posted by sk66

IMO, it doesn't matter so much where the images will end up, but rather the type of shooting you do.

The thing with web images is that theyre usually downsampled from full-size shots. That means you all but eliminate noise and dont have to worry about things like diffraction.

The D80 should be fine, but if you need more the D90 would give you the same D300s image quality in a smaller and more familiar body.