|
|||
|
Hi all,
Been doing a lot of pictures of cycling (outdoor) lately. I've been using a D90 with the 18-105mm lens. I usually stop the lens down to f/8 in order to get the whole rider, or two riders in focus. My question is this: is it worth buying a fast lens (like the 70-200 VR), if I'm just going to be stopping it down to f/8? Would the 70-200 transmit more light at f/8 at 105mm than my 18-105mm lens at f/8? The VR is not important to me. The AF-S is though. Thanks, Bri
__________________
Nikon D100 Last edited by PolarBear1973; 03-10-2010 at 11:09 AM. |
|
|||
|
Well, the faster glass is (typically) a better lens all things being equal. So you should get a better picture (at equivalent f stop) with less distortions in the corners, edges, etc.
The lens with faster glass may also be built better as well. So it may not break as easily. |
|
|||
|
At the same focal length, and the same aperture, they should be transmitting the same amount of light. So there probably isn't any benefit to be gained from a faster lens. A faster lens is only a benefit if you use it opened up.
|
|
||||
|
The lenses you mention fulfill very different roles, and thats why it may not be of use to you. If youre shooting at f/8, the only real differences you'll see are in distortion, flare, CA, colour, rendition, contrast, etc.
The reason the 70-200 f/2.8 is so popular is that you can use it a full 2 stops better at 105 than the 18-105 (f/2.8 vs f/5.6). Even if youre not using it wide open, 1 stop is better than nothing. And you get all the advantages i mention above.
__________________
I am responsible for what I say; not what you understand. OsmosisStudios Gear List |
|
||||
|
If you're you're just shooting at f/8 you'll be hard pressed to see the differences between the two lenses. All lenses perform well in normal conditions. You may the premium when you want to shoot in more diffifult conditions. That could mean low light, harsh light, high contrast, hazardous environment, really long or really short focal lengths, etc. Bottom line, if you're happy with the image quality you're getting with your current lens, there's no need to upgrade.
__________________
flickr Why I Like Photographs "It's more expensive, but it lets me adjust really specific settings that most people don't notice or think about." - Abed |
|
||||
|
Well all I can tell you is that pictures taken with my Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 are much sharper than similar pictures taken in the overlapping ranges from my 18-200, 55-200, or 70-300 lenses. The glass is just better.
__________________
Nikon D700, D300, D5000, NIKON GLASS 85mm F/1.8 D, 105mm f/2.8 Micro AF-S VR, 70-200 AF-S VR f/2.8, 28-300 AF-S VRII,10.5mm Fisheye, 24-70 AF-S f/2.8, TC-20E II AF-S, Sigma 12-24 HSM, Sigma 30mm f/1.4 HSM, Sigma 150-500 OS, 2 SB-600 Speedlights, Manfrotto 190MF3 tripod & 322RC2 ball grip head. - NJ, USA Flickr Photobucket Ok to edit and repost my shots on DPS forums |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.
This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.
Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:
For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!
To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.
Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter: