#1 (permalink)  
Old 03-10-2010, 11:06 AM
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 12
Default Worth getting fast lens if it has to be stopped down?

Hi all,

Been doing a lot of pictures of cycling (outdoor) lately. I've been using a D90 with the 18-105mm lens. I usually stop the lens down to f/8 in order to get the whole rider, or two riders in focus. My question is this: is it worth buying a fast lens (like the 70-200 VR), if I'm just going to be stopping it down to f/8? Would the 70-200 transmit more light at f/8 at 105mm than my 18-105mm lens at f/8?

The VR is not important to me. The AF-S is though.

Thanks,
Bri
__________________
Nikon D100

Last edited by PolarBear1973; 03-10-2010 at 11:09 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-10-2010, 12:02 PM
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: NJ, Near NYC
Posts: 932
Default

Well, the faster glass is (typically) a better lens all things being equal. So you should get a better picture (at equivalent f stop) with less distortions in the corners, edges, etc.

The lens with faster glass may also be built better as well. So it may not break as easily.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-10-2010, 12:46 PM
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 604
Default

At the same focal length, and the same aperture, they should be transmitting the same amount of light. So there probably isn't any benefit to be gained from a faster lens. A faster lens is only a benefit if you use it opened up.
__________________
blog | flickr | Canon 5DII, 7D
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-10-2010, 01:59 PM
OsmosisStudios's Avatar
Don't Panic
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Mississauga / Ottawa
Posts: 11,358
Default

The lenses you mention fulfill very different roles, and thats why it may not be of use to you. If youre shooting at f/8, the only real differences you'll see are in distortion, flare, CA, colour, rendition, contrast, etc.

The reason the 70-200 f/2.8 is so popular is that you can use it a full 2 stops better at 105 than the 18-105 (f/2.8 vs f/5.6). Even if youre not using it wide open, 1 stop is better than nothing. And you get all the advantages i mention above.
__________________
I am responsible for what I say; not what you understand.
OsmosisStudios
Gear List
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-10-2010, 07:32 PM
vandergus's Avatar
Person
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Posts: 1,088
Default

If you're you're just shooting at f/8 you'll be hard pressed to see the differences between the two lenses. All lenses perform well in normal conditions. You may the premium when you want to shoot in more diffifult conditions. That could mean low light, harsh light, high contrast, hazardous environment, really long or really short focal lengths, etc. Bottom line, if you're happy with the image quality you're getting with your current lens, there's no need to upgrade.
__________________
flickr
Why I Like Photographs

"It's more expensive, but it lets me adjust really specific settings that most people don't notice or think about." - Abed
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-10-2010, 08:01 PM
dPS +1000 Club
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,914
Default

You may get faster focus lock with the 70-200's AF-S at f/2.8 (even when you shoot at f/8).
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 03-12-2010, 08:29 PM
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 12
Default

Thanks for the replies. That really clears things up.
__________________
Nikon D100
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 03-12-2010, 09:36 PM
kirbinster's Avatar
Always carry your camera
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,635
Default

Well all I can tell you is that pictures taken with my Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 are much sharper than similar pictures taken in the overlapping ranges from my 18-200, 55-200, or 70-300 lenses. The glass is just better.
__________________
Nikon D700, D300, D5000, NIKON GLASS 85mm F/1.8 D, 105mm f/2.8 Micro AF-S VR, 70-200 AF-S VR f/2.8, 28-300 AF-S VRII,10.5mm Fisheye, 24-70 AF-S f/2.8, TC-20E II AF-S, Sigma 12-24 HSM, Sigma 30mm f/1.4 HSM, Sigma 150-500 OS, 2 SB-600 Speedlights, Manfrotto 190MF3 tripod & 322RC2 ball grip head. - NJ, USA
Flickr Photobucket
Ok to edit and repost my shots on DPS forums
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0