#1 (permalink)  
Old 08-15-2007, 09:39 PM
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: ON CA
Posts: 136
Default Half Banded Toper (Dragonfly type insect)

What do you guys think?







__________________
Gear - Nikon D200, Nikkor 18-55mm 2.8, Nikkor 80-200mm 2.8, Nikkor 300mm 4.0, 1.7 Nikkor teleconvertor
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-15-2007, 10:08 PM
Wanderer
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 479
Default

nice series of shots.i like 2 & 4
__________________
My Flickr
Gear: olympus sp 320
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-16-2007, 01:43 AM
matthewchj's Avatar
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Singapore
Posts: 836
Default

Lovely shots showing lots of detail on the insect but leaving a nicely blurred background.

Love the first one the best.
__________________
Canon 350D, 18-55mm 3.5-5.6, 50mm 1.8, 100mm 2.8 Macro, 75-300mm 4-5.6, Sigma 10-20mm 4-5.6
flickr|Photoblog
A picture is a frozen slice of time painted on paper.
OK to edit and repost my shots on DPS
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-16-2007, 07:27 AM
wulf's Avatar
Ninja Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 9,830
Default

The first one is also my favourite - I'm not quite convinced that the cropping couldn't be improved and I find the writing distracting but I love the sharpness of the wing detail. I don't think the others are quite as successful in focusing on a critical area and look a bit soft in comparison.

What lens did you use for these shots?

Wulf
__________________
Wulf Forrester-Barker << Sites: blog / flickr >>
Gear: Nikon D40, Nikon AFS 18-55mm f/3.5 - 5.6G, Nikon Series E 50mm f/1.8, Nikon AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6G, Vivitar 90mm f/2.5 macro, Raynox DCR-250, Lensbaby 2.0k, SB600
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08-16-2007, 07:35 AM
brianfarrell's Avatar
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 145
Default

Second one for me - and like Wulf, I too would prefer to see the image without the text. In the close-ups, you have focus on the face - for better impact you need to put critical focus on the eyes - same rules as any portrait

hth
Brian

PS the big domed things behind the antennae are the eyes for those who need to know...

PPS I've got a shot on here which has focus on the eyes - it isn't perfect by any means but might show you what I mean... see thread 'toothpick'

Last edited by brianfarrell; 08-16-2007 at 07:41 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 08-16-2007, 11:04 AM
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: ON CA
Posts: 136
Default

Thanks for your comments guys, I am still learning as I go.

The lense I was using was 80-200mm f2.8 with extension tubes hand held.

FF
__________________
Gear - Nikon D200, Nikkor 18-55mm 2.8, Nikkor 80-200mm 2.8, Nikkor 300mm 4.0, 1.7 Nikkor teleconvertor
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 08-16-2007, 11:30 AM
wulf's Avatar
Ninja Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 9,830
Default

What aperture did you use? I wonder if the sharpness problem is that DoF is minimal when you get close enough for macro photography - 2.8 might let in more light but stopping further down gives a wider area of sharpness, even if the resulting picture is a bit underexposed and needs to be boosted a touch in post-processing (much easier than trying to simulate sharpness!).

The pictures of the bug's face are impressively close-up and would be breathtaking if they were sharper.

Wulf
__________________
Wulf Forrester-Barker << Sites: blog / flickr >>
Gear: Nikon D40, Nikon AFS 18-55mm f/3.5 - 5.6G, Nikon Series E 50mm f/1.8, Nikon AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6G, Vivitar 90mm f/2.5 macro, Raynox DCR-250, Lensbaby 2.0k, SB600
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 08-16-2007, 11:40 AM
brianfarrell's Avatar
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 145
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by ff151 View Post
Thanks for your comments guys, I am still learning as I go.

The lense I was using was 80-200mm f2.8 with extension tubes hand held.

FF
For a handheld shot with that lens and tubes, you did really well
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 08-16-2007, 01:09 PM
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: ON CA
Posts: 136
Default

I was trying to get my exposure correct yet give more DOF. I tried to adjust my aperature from 2.8 but found that the pics turned out quite dark. I am fairly new to photography and have not experimented with creating a dark exposure and lightening it up with software. This I will probably do in months to come.

If only you guys saw me trying to brace myself on the edge of a ditch, and handhold the camera, you would be laughing!
__________________
Gear - Nikon D200, Nikkor 18-55mm 2.8, Nikkor 80-200mm 2.8, Nikkor 300mm 4.0, 1.7 Nikkor teleconvertor
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 08-16-2007, 02:00 PM
wulf's Avatar
Ninja Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 9,830
Default

Did you adjust your ISO setting? Each "click" along that track would let you adjust the aperture by one step in the other direction. Likewise, it looks more like DoF rather than motion blur, so you might be able to use a slightly slower shutter speed to make another adjustment towards a smaller aperture (ie. larger number, less light but greater DoF).

Wulf
__________________
Wulf Forrester-Barker << Sites: blog / flickr >>
Gear: Nikon D40, Nikon AFS 18-55mm f/3.5 - 5.6G, Nikon Series E 50mm f/1.8, Nikon AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6G, Vivitar 90mm f/2.5 macro, Raynox DCR-250, Lensbaby 2.0k, SB600
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0